FCC Proposes Faster Cables but Tighter Security from Adversaries
Published Date: 10/27/2025
Proposed Rule
Summary
The FCC wants to make sure submarine internet cables landing in the U.S. stay safe from foreign threats while speeding up new cable projects. They’re proposing new rules that require cable owners to report on risky foreign connections and use trusted tech, with some licenses getting automatic approval if they meet certain standards. Comments on these changes are open until late December 2025, and these rules could affect companies that own or operate these cables.
Analyzed Economic Effects
9 provisions identified: 2 benefits, 6 costs, 1 mixed.
Excluding Foreign-Adversary Entities From Blanket License
The FCC proposes to exclude from the blanket license any entity that would be subject to the foreign adversary and/or character presumptive disqualifying conditions adopted in the Report and Order. Entities meeting those disqualifying conditions would not receive the blanket license and could face further review or denial.
SLTE Owners Must Become Licensees
The FCC proposes to require any entity that owns or operates Submarine Line Terminal Equipment (SLTE) to become a cable landing licensee. This proposal appears in the FCC's Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking adopted August 7, 2025 and released August 13, 2025 and would amend Sec. 1.70003 to include SLTE owners and operators as licensees.
Blanket License for Existing SLTE Owners
The FCC proposes to grant a blanket cable landing license to existing SLTE owners and operators to reduce the need for individual initial or modification applications. The blanket license would apply to entities that own or operate SLTE on commissioned-licensed submarine cable systems prior to the effective date of any new rules adopted in this proceeding.
Annual Foreign Adversary Report for SLTEs
The FCC proposes an annual SLTE Foreign Adversary Annual Report for SLTE owners/operators that meet one or more criteria: (1) owned/controlled by a foreign adversary per Sec. 1.70001(g); (2) identified on the Commission's Covered List; (3) have purchased or use equipment/services on the Covered List in the submarine cable infrastructure; (4) had a Commission authorization/license denied, revoked, or terminated on national security or law enforcement grounds (and affiliates); or (5) the submarine cable lands in, or the SLTE is located/operated from, a foreign adversary country per Sec. 1.70001(f).
Routine License Conditions for SLTE Owners
The FCC proposes routine conditions on the blanket license for SLTE owners/operators, including: (1) compliance with FCC rules and treaties; (2) not acquiring rights to handle U.S. traffic without section 214 authorization; (3) prior approval to affiliate with a foreign carrier; (4) filing annual circuit capacity reports under Sec. 43.82; (5) revocability after due notice; and (6) complying with SLTE Foreign Adversary Annual Report requirements, among others.
Faster Processing If Applications Meet Standards
While this FNPRM is pending, the FCC will apply streamlined processing and will not defer action on a submarine cable application unless Executive Branch agencies, including the Committee, provide specific and compelling national security, law enforcement, or other justifications. The FCC also proposes presumptively excluding some submarine cable applications from referral to Executive Branch agencies if they meet certain standards to expedite deployment.
Potential Requirement to Remove Covered Equipment
The FCC seeks comment on requiring existing licensees to remove from their submarine cable systems any covered equipment or services within a specified timeframe prior to license expiration. This is a proposed option the FCC asks about in the FNPRM to address national security and law enforcement risks.
Encouraging Trusted U.S. and Allied Technologies
The FCC seeks comment on how it can use its authority under the Cable Landing License Act and Executive Order 10530 to incentivize and encourage adoption and use of trusted technologies produced by the United States and its foreign allies. The FNPRM asks for input on incentive approaches to increase use of trusted suppliers.
30-Day Update Requirement for SLTE Changes
The FCC proposes that SLTE owners and operators must notify the Commission within thirty (30) days of changes in: (1) point of contact; (2) name of the SLTE owner/operator or submarine cable system; (3) ownership resulting in becoming owned/controlled by a foreign adversary; and (4) SLTE location such as address or coordinates.
Personalized for You
How does this regulation affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this federal register document means for your household, plus every other regulation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Key Dates
Department and Agencies
Related Federal Register Documents
2026-16740, Information Collection Being Submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for Emergency Review and Approval
As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, and as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collection. Comments are requested concerning: Whether the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; the accuracy of the Commission's burden estimate; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and ways to further reduce the information collection burden on small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees. The Commission may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the PRA that does not display a valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number.
2026-16615, Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions-2026
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review (Sep. 30, 1993), requires each agency to publish a regulatory agenda (Agenda) of regulations under development or review during the next year which will be included in the Unified Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions (Unified Agenda). 58 FR 51735 (Oct. 4, 1993). The Agenda required by Executive Order 12866 must include all regulations the agency expects to develop or review during the next 12 months, regardless of whether they may have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Executive Order 12866 provides that agencies may combine this agenda with the regulatory flexibility agenda required under the RFA. To help keep the public informed of significant rulemaking proceedings and meet its obligations under the RFA and Executive Order 12866, the Commission has prepared Agenda entries providing a brief description and summary of each regulatory activity that is currently planned for the 12 months, subject to revision, including the objectives and legal basis for each, and the name and telephone number of an agency official who is knowledgeable about items in the agenda. The Commission's Agenda entries published in the Federal Register are only those entries for rules that are likely to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities pursuant to the RFA. The Commission's complete list of regulatory and deregulatory actions for the Unified Agenda will be published on the internet in a searchable format at www.reginfo.gov.
2026-16590, FCC To Review E-Rate Program To Ensure Congress's Vision
In this document, the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) seeks comment on measures the Commission can take to better protect children when using E-Rate-funded networks, the Commission's progress in ensuring affordable access to high-speed broadband to and within schools and libraries, and whether the Commission's current interpretation of the Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA) is the best reading of the statute. The Commission also proposes actions to strengthen E-Rate program integrity and streamline program administration.
2026-16503, Empowering Broadband Consumers Through Transparency
In this document, the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) eliminates or modifies certain broadband label requirements to ensure that consumers have clear, accurate, and concise information when shopping for broadband plans. Specifically, the Commission enables providers to describe label information in a natural, conversational style over the phone; simplify fee presentation to avoid clutter; remove outdated information from the label; use links or icons at point-of-sale to avoid unwieldy amounts of information that can overwhelm consumers; and eliminate requirements that go beyond our mandate. At the same time, the Commission ensures the labels remain accessible to people with disabilities, and that labels are displayed in the same language(s) used when marketing a service.
2026-16299, Information Collection Being Submitted for Review and Approval to Office of Management and Budget
As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or the Commission) invites the general public and other Federal Agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collection. Pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, the FCC seeks specific comment on how it can further reduce the information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.
2026-16298, Information Collection Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications Commission
As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, and as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or Commission) invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collections. Comments are requested concerning: whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; the accuracy of the Commission's burden estimate; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and ways to further reduce the information collection burden on small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees. The FCC may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the PRA that does not display a valid OMB control number.
Previous / Next Documents
Previous: 2025-19642, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Employment-Based Immigrant Visa, Fifth Preference (EB-5) Fee Rule
The government plans to change the fees for the EB-5 immigrant visa program, which helps people invest in the U.S. to get green cards. These updates will support new rules from the 2022 EB-5 Reform Act and make sure the program stays fair and strong. If you’re involved with EB-5 visas, watch for fee changes and get your comments in by December 22, 2025!
Next: 2025-19673, Modification of Significant New Use Rules of Certain Chemical Substances (23-1.M)
The government is updating rules about how certain chemicals can be used, especially new ways that might be risky. Companies making or using these chemicals need to watch out because they might have to tell the government before trying new uses. These changes kick in soon and could affect how businesses plan and spend money on chemicals.