Trade Commission Reviews Imported Urinal Splash Guards for Violations
Published Date: 12/8/2025
Notice
Summary
The U.S. International Trade Commission is taking a second look at a decision about certain urine splash guards that may have broken patent rules. This affects companies importing or selling these products in the U.S., with possible changes to how these products can be sold or stopped. The Commission is asking for opinions on how to fix the issue, protect the public, and handle money matters soon.
Analyzed Economic Effects
5 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 4 costs, 1 mixed.
Imports could be blocked by exclusion order
If the Commission orders an exclusion, the specified urine splash guards and components could be barred from entry into the United States. That exclusion would prevent importers and U.S. sellers from bringing these products into the U.S. market while the remedy is in effect.
Respondents may face cease-and-desist orders
The Commission could order cease-and-desist orders (CDOs) requiring respondents to stop importing or selling the accused urine splash guards in the United States. The ALJ recommended CDOs against Maomaohouse, Le Sengyu, HealthSTEC, and Lishian (but not Edermurs) in the recommended determination.
Bond could be set at 100% during Presidential review
If the Commission issues a remedy, the U.S. Trade Representative has 60 days for Presidential review, and during that period subject articles may enter only under bond. Complainant asked for, and the ALJ recommended, a bond equal to 100% of the entered value of infringing articles during the Presidential review period.
ALJ found defaulting respondents infringed patents
On September 17, 2025, the ALJ issued an initial determination finding the Defaulting Respondents in default and granted summary determination of a violation of section 337 as to claims 1 and 2 of U.S. Patent No. 7,870,619 and claims 1 and 2 of U.S. Patent No. 11,812,901. The ALJ recommended a general exclusion order and CDOs against several named respondents.
Public-interest factors will shape any remedy
When deciding whether to order an exclusion or CDOs, the Commission will consider the public interest, including effects on (1) public health and welfare, (2) competitive conditions in the U.S. economy, (3) U.S. production of like or directly competitive articles, and (4) U.S. consumers. Parties and agencies were asked to submit written comments on these factors.
Personalized for You
How does this regulation affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this federal register document means for your household, plus every other regulation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Key Dates
Department and Agencies
Related Federal Register Documents
2026-17046, Certain Wireless Communications Devices and Components Thereof; Notice of Request for Submissions on the Public Interest
Notice is hereby given that on August 14, 2026, the presiding administrative law judge ("ALJ") issued an Initial Determination on Violation of Section 337. The ALJ also issued a Recommended Determination on remedy and bonding should a violation be found in the above-captioned investigation. The Commission is soliciting submissions on public interest issues raised by the recommended relief should the Commission find a violation. This notice is soliciting comments from the public and interested government agencies only.
2026-17011, Notice of Receipt of Complaint; Solicitation of Comments Relating to the Public Interest
Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has received a complaint entitled Certain Electronic Devices with Certain Audio Technologies, DN 3931; the Commission is soliciting comments on any public interest issues raised by the complaint or complainant's filing pursuant to the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure.
2026-16848, Silicon Metal From Australia and Norway; Determinations
2026-16905, Certain Transformers and Components Thereof; Notice of Institution of Investigation
A company called Ayr Energy says some transformers and their parts imported into the U.S. are using stolen secrets and fake branding, which could hurt American businesses. The U.S. International Trade Commission is now investigating and might stop these products from being sold here. This could lead to new rules and orders soon, affecting companies selling these transformers and possibly changing what’s on store shelves.
2026-16811, Certain Ink Cartridges and Components Thereof II; Notice of a Commission Determination Finding a Violation Under Section 337; Issuance of a General Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders; Termination of the Investigation
Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to find a violation under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and to issue a general exclusion order ("GEO") prohibiting the importation of products that infringe claims 1 and 7 of each of the following patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 8,764,172 ("the '172 patent"); 9,370,934 ("the '934 patent"); 11,535,038 ("the '038 patent"); 12,240,248 ("the '248 patent"); and 12,240,249 ("the '249 patent"); and cease and desist orders ("CDOs") against respondents Mountain Peak, Inc. and Straightouttaink, LP. The investigation is terminated.
2026-16816, Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof From China; Determination
Previous / Next Documents
Previous: 2025-22159, Notice of Formal Determination on Records Release
The Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board decided to release 22 pages of important records about a civil rights cold case. These records will now be public, following a law that makes sure such decisions are shared quickly. This update affects anyone interested in civil rights history and transparency, with no costs or delays involved.
Next: 2025-22161, Certain Semiconductor Devices and Products Containing the Same; Notice of Request for Submissions on the Public Interest
The U.S. International Trade Commission is asking the public and government agencies to share their thoughts on a possible ban of certain imported semiconductor devices linked to a legal violation. This could affect companies like Innoscience and might change what tech products can enter the U.S. If the ban happens, it could impact prices and availability, so your input matters before a final decision is made.