Options Fee Gets Extra Half-Year Lifeline from Cboe
Published Date: 12/22/2025
Notice
Summary
Cboe Exchange is keeping the current Options Regulatory Fee (ORF) at $0.0023 per contract side for six more months, extending it from December 31, 2025, to June 30, 2026. This means traders and firms using Cboe Options will keep paying the same fee through mid-2026. The change kicks in right after the new year, so everyone can plan ahead without surprises!
Analyzed Economic Effects
4 provisions identified: 2 benefits, 2 costs, 0 mixed.
Exchange proposes new on-exchange ORF model
Cboe submitted a separate filing proposing a modified ORF model that would assess ORF only on transactions executed on the exchange and clearing in the customer range at OCC, with an expected effective date of July 1, 2026 (subject to adoption by all options exchanges). The Exchange says it will implement the modified model once a consistent framework is established and other exchanges adopt a similar approach.
ORF stays $0.0023 through June 30, 2026
Cboe will keep the Options Regulatory Fee (ORF) at $0.0023 per contract side starting January 2, 2026 and extending the temporary rate through June 30, 2026 (instead of reverting on December 31, 2025). This means trading firms and Trading Permit Holders (TPHs) that pay ORF will continue to pay $0.0023 per contract side through mid-2026.
ORF applies to customer-range trades across exchanges
The ORF is charged on customer-range options transactions cleared by a Trading Permit Holder (TPH) at the Options Clearing Corporation (OCC) regardless of the exchange where the trade happened, including transactions during Global Trading Hours. That means TPHs pay the fee on customer-range business even if the execution occurred off the Cboe exchange.
ORF revenue capped at 75% of regulatory costs
Cboe states it intends for revenue from ORF, combined with other regulatory fees and fines, not to exceed 75% of its total annual regulatory costs and will monitor revenues at least semi-annually. If revenues would exceed regulatory costs, the Exchange says it will reduce the ORF and will not use excess ORF revenue for nonregulatory purposes.
Personalized for You
How does this regulation affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this federal register document means for your household, plus every other regulation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Key Dates
Department and Agencies
Related Federal Register Documents
2026-20466, Adviser and Regulated Fund Custody Rules; Crypto Custody Rules
The SEC is updating rules for how investment advisers and funds handle crypto assets, making sure they keep these digital investments safe and properly reported. These changes affect advisers, funds, and anyone managing crypto securities, aiming to modernize rules and improve transparency. Comments on the proposal are open until December 7, 2026, so get ready to weigh in!
2026-19260, Rescission of Rule 14a-8's Federal Regulation of Shareholder Proposals and Amendments to Rule 14a-4
The SEC wants to stop its federal rule that controls how shareholders can make proposals at company meetings, letting state laws and company rules take over instead. They’re also changing rules so companies can sometimes vote on proposals not in their official materials—but shareholders can opt out if they want. This affects investors and companies, with comments open until November 20, 2026, and could shake up how shareholder voices are heard and counted.
2026-18424, Political Contributions by Certain Investment Advisers
The Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission" or the "SEC") is proposing to rescind the political contribution rule under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the "Advisers Act"), which prohibits investment advisers from providing investment advisory services for compensation to a government client for two years after an adviser or any covered associate of the adviser makes a contribution to certain categories of elected officials or candidates, among other prohibitions. In the more than fifteen years since the rule was adopted, implementation challenges associated with the political contribution rule have resulted in a range of significant unintended consequences, including compliance practices among some investment advisers that may have had the effect of restricting all political contributions by the investment advisers and their employees. Market participants also have stated that the political contribution rule is burdensome, complex, and both lacks clarity and creates a de facto strict liability standard. The Commission is of the view that other existing requirements of the Advisers Act and its associated rules, including prohibitions on fraud, fiduciary duty requirements, the compliance rule, and the code of ethics rule (defined below), are likely sufficient to address pay-to-play practices while allowing an adviser the flexibility to implement an approach that is more appropriately tailored to its particular risks, rendering the political contribution rule unnecessary. The Commission also is proposing to amend the rule under the Advisers Act pertaining to books and records consistent with the proposed rescission.
2026-18190, Transfer Agent Rules
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC" or "Commission") is proposing to adopt new rules, amend existing rules, amend the existing form for registration with the Commission as a transfer agent (Form TA-1) and the existing form for reporting activities of transfer agents (Form TA-2), and rescind an existing rule governing registered transfer agents. The proposals are designed to modernize the rules governing registered transfer agents.
2026-17183, Regulation Crypto Assets
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") is proposing new rules to create a tailored offering regime for certain investment contracts involving crypto assets. The proposed offering regime is intended to facilitate capital formation and accommodate innovation within the crypto asset markets while, at the same time, ensuring that investors are adequately protected and provided with the information they need to make informed investment decisions. The proposed rules would be set forth in a new regulation titled "Regulation Crypto Assets" and would include two exemptions from the registration requirements of section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933. The first exemption would permit offerings of up to $5 million during a four-year period. The second exemption would permit offerings of up to $75 million during each 12-month period. Under both exemptions, issuers would be required to make certain principles-based narrative disclosures available to their investors. In addition, issuers under the second exemption would be required to provide financial statements and would be subject to ongoing reporting requirements. Issuers that rely on these exemptions would remain subject to the antifraud and antimanipulation provisions of the Federal securities laws. The proposed rules also would include a conditional safe harbor from the term "investment contract" in the definitions of "security" in the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If the conditions of that proposed safe harbor are satisfied, then a crypto asset would be deemed not to be subject to an investment contract for purposes of those definitions of "security."
2026-12163, The Trade-Through Rule and Locked and Crossed Markets Provisions of Regulation NMS
The SEC wants to scrap some old rules that stop stocks from being traded at worse prices and prevent confusing market quotes. This change affects stock traders and exchanges, aiming to simplify trading and possibly speed things up. If you want to share your thoughts, you’ve got until August 17, 2026, so don’t miss out!
Previous / Next Documents
Previous: 2025-23516, Certain Low-Profile Microwave-Hood Combination Products; Notice of Institution of Investigation
Whirlpool has asked the U.S. International Trade Commission to investigate certain low-profile microwave-hood combos for patent infringement. If the claims hold up, some imports and sales of these products could be blocked, shaking up the market and possibly affecting prices. This investigation started in late 2025 and could lead to important changes for manufacturers and sellers.
Next: 2025-23518, Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Adopt a New Methodology for Assessment and Collection of the Options Regulatory Fee (ORF)
Cboe Exchange is changing how it charges the Options Regulatory Fee (ORF) for trades made on its platform. Starting immediately, only options trades that clear in customer accounts will be charged this fee, which could affect traders’ costs. This update aims to make fee collection fairer and clearer for everyone involved.