SEC Stock Exchanges: Same Old Form, No Thrills
Published Date: 1/9/2026
Notice
Summary
The SEC is asking self-regulatory organizations (like stock exchanges and clearing agencies) to keep filing their rule changes using Form 19b-4. This helps the SEC review and decide if these changes are safe and fair. No big changes or extra costs are planned, but the SEC wants your comments before extending this paperwork process.
Analyzed Economic Effects
6 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 6 costs, 0 mixed.
SEC extends mandatory Rule 19b-4 filings
The SEC is proposing to extend the paperwork collection under Rule 19b-4 and Form 19b-4, and compliance is mandatory. The agency estimates the total annual burden for all respondents is 92,876 hours and the total estimated external cost burden is $1,270,500.
Ongoing filing, posting, rulebook update burdens
Each SRO filed about 41 proposed rule changes on average in 2024; each filing takes about 41 hours. The SEC estimates the annual burden for filing proposed rule changes is 75,645 hours, posting proposals to SRO websites is 7,380 hours, updating online rulebooks is 4,496 hours, and preparing notices when postings are late is 17 hours.
Security-based swap submission costs for clearing agencies
Two security-based swap clearing agencies are estimated to submit 13 Security-Based Swap Submissions each year, with each submission taking about 140 hours, for a total of 3,640 hours. The SEC estimates outside legal costs for these submissions will total $720,720 annually. Two clearing agencies also may incur a one-time 30-hour website update (10 hours annualized).
Advance Notice burdens for clearing agencies
Designated clearing agencies must file Advance Notices of material rule or operations changes; the SEC estimates each designated clearing agency will file two Advance Notices per year, each taking about 90 hours, for a total of 720 hours across four designated clearing agencies. The Commission estimates outside legal work for those filings will total $147,840 annually.
Time and legal costs for stays of clearing requirements
Under Rule 3Ca-1, clearing agencies are estimated to submit four applications for stays of a mandatory clearing requirement per year, taking about 18 hours each (144 hours total for two clearing agencies). The SEC estimates outside legal costs for the two clearing agencies at $32,340 annually and that counterparties will incur outside legal costs totaling $369,600 annually.
EFFS training and internal policy drafting burdens
Respondents must train staff to use the Electronic Form 19b-4 Filing System (EFFS) and draft internal policies. The SEC estimates two anticipated national exchanges will spend about 60 hours training (20 hours annualized) and 260 hours drafting policies (87 hours annualized), and that all 45 respondents will spend 10 hours each year training staff (450 hours total).
Personalized for You
How does this regulation affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this federal register document means for your household, plus every other regulation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Key Dates
Department and Agencies
Related Federal Register Documents
2026-19260, Rescission of Rule 14a-8's Federal Regulation of Shareholder Proposals and Amendments to Rule 14a-4
The SEC wants to stop its federal rule that controls how shareholders can make proposals at company meetings, letting state laws and company rules take over instead. They’re also changing rules so companies can sometimes vote on proposals not in their official materials—but shareholders can opt out if they want. This affects investors and companies, with comments open until November 20, 2026, and could shake up how shareholder voices are heard and counted.
2026-18424, Political Contributions by Certain Investment Advisers
The Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission" or the "SEC") is proposing to rescind the political contribution rule under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the "Advisers Act"), which prohibits investment advisers from providing investment advisory services for compensation to a government client for two years after an adviser or any covered associate of the adviser makes a contribution to certain categories of elected officials or candidates, among other prohibitions. In the more than fifteen years since the rule was adopted, implementation challenges associated with the political contribution rule have resulted in a range of significant unintended consequences, including compliance practices among some investment advisers that may have had the effect of restricting all political contributions by the investment advisers and their employees. Market participants also have stated that the political contribution rule is burdensome, complex, and both lacks clarity and creates a de facto strict liability standard. The Commission is of the view that other existing requirements of the Advisers Act and its associated rules, including prohibitions on fraud, fiduciary duty requirements, the compliance rule, and the code of ethics rule (defined below), are likely sufficient to address pay-to-play practices while allowing an adviser the flexibility to implement an approach that is more appropriately tailored to its particular risks, rendering the political contribution rule unnecessary. The Commission also is proposing to amend the rule under the Advisers Act pertaining to books and records consistent with the proposed rescission.
2026-18190, Transfer Agent Rules
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC" or "Commission") is proposing to adopt new rules, amend existing rules, amend the existing form for registration with the Commission as a transfer agent (Form TA-1) and the existing form for reporting activities of transfer agents (Form TA-2), and rescind an existing rule governing registered transfer agents. The proposals are designed to modernize the rules governing registered transfer agents.
2026-17183, Regulation Crypto Assets
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") is proposing new rules to create a tailored offering regime for certain investment contracts involving crypto assets. The proposed offering regime is intended to facilitate capital formation and accommodate innovation within the crypto asset markets while, at the same time, ensuring that investors are adequately protected and provided with the information they need to make informed investment decisions. The proposed rules would be set forth in a new regulation titled "Regulation Crypto Assets" and would include two exemptions from the registration requirements of section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933. The first exemption would permit offerings of up to $5 million during a four-year period. The second exemption would permit offerings of up to $75 million during each 12-month period. Under both exemptions, issuers would be required to make certain principles-based narrative disclosures available to their investors. In addition, issuers under the second exemption would be required to provide financial statements and would be subject to ongoing reporting requirements. Issuers that rely on these exemptions would remain subject to the antifraud and antimanipulation provisions of the Federal securities laws. The proposed rules also would include a conditional safe harbor from the term "investment contract" in the definitions of "security" in the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If the conditions of that proposed safe harbor are satisfied, then a crypto asset would be deemed not to be subject to an investment contract for purposes of those definitions of "security."
2026-12163, The Trade-Through Rule and Locked and Crossed Markets Provisions of Regulation NMS
The SEC wants to scrap some old rules that stop stocks from being traded at worse prices and prevent confusing market quotes. This change affects stock traders and exchanges, aiming to simplify trading and possibly speed things up. If you want to share your thoughts, you’ve got until August 17, 2026, so don’t miss out!
2026-10373, Registered Offering Reform
The SEC wants to make it easier and cheaper for more companies to sell their stocks and bonds to the public. They’re opening up special forms and benefits to more businesses, updating rules to be more modern, and cutting red tape by overriding some state rules. If you’re a company planning to raise money, these changes could speed things up and save you money, with feedback due by July 27, 2026.
Previous / Next Documents
Previous: 2026-00275, Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Extension: Rule 13e-3 (Schedule 13e-3)
The SEC is asking for public feedback to keep using and extend Rule 13e-3, which helps companies share important info when they’re buying back their own stock. This rule affects companies involved in these buybacks and keeps paperwork clear and consistent, now also approved for use by the Federal Reserve. No big changes or costs are expected, but the SEC wants to keep everything running smoothly and on time.
Next: 2026-00277, Science and Technology Reinvention Laboratory Personnel Demonstration Project Program
The Department of Defense is creating new senior business and technical manager jobs called Senior Business Technical Managers (SBTMs) at special Science and Technology labs. These leaders will help run business and tech operations and advise top commanders. The changes won’t start until after a 30-day comment period ending February 9, 2026, so affected employees and the public can share their thoughts first.