FDIC Swaps Appeals Committee for Fairer Bank Oversight Office
Published Date: 1/26/2026
Notice
Summary
The FDIC is shaking things up by replacing its old appeals committee with a brand-new, independent Office of Supervisory Appeals. This change means banks and insured institutions get a faster, fairer way to challenge big supervisory decisions. The new rules kick in as soon as this office is up and running, making the appeals process clearer and more trustworthy—no extra costs for banks, just better fairness!
Analyzed Economic Effects
13 provisions identified: 7 benefits, 3 costs, 3 mixed.
Enforcement-Related Facts Can Be Appealed (Limited)
The Guidelines permit the Office to consider the facts and circumstances underlying certain proposed formal enforcement actions as part of an appeal, except when the proposed enforcement is based in whole or part on (1) unsafe or unsound practices under section 8 of the FDIA, or (2) violations related to AML/CFT or sanctions compliance. If an institution appeals such determinations, the appeal will be considered on an expedited schedule and the FDIC generally expects to delay initiation of the enforcement action until the appeal concludes.
New Independent Appeals Office
The FDIC replaces the Supervision Appeals Review Committee with a standalone Office of Supervisory Appeals that will have delegated authority to consider and resolve appeals. The Office will operate as an independent office reporting to the FDIC Chairperson's Office and use panels of reviewing officials to decide appeals.
Burden of Proof Remains With Institution
The Guidelines keep the burden of proof on the appealing institution for all matters at issue in an appeal, including timeliness. The FDIC is not adopting a stated preponderance-of-evidence standard in the Guidelines, though it notes preponderance is generally consistent with past practice.
More Appealable Determinations
The final Guidelines explicitly allow appeals of determinations as to compliance with informal enforcement actions and compliance with conditions imposed through supervision or application processes. They do not include decisions relating to resolution plans.
Tolling Requirement for Enforcement Appeals
If an institution appeals supervisory determinations that form the basis for a proposed enforcement action, the FDIC will require the institution to sign an agreement to toll the relevant statute of limitations. If the institution refuses, the facts and circumstances underlying the enforcement action will no longer be eligible for appeal.
Stays Decided by Division Director
Requests to stay a supervisory decision while an appeal is pending will continue to be decided by the Division Director rather than the Office, and the Guidelines state the Division Director's analysis will weigh potential harms, such as safety-and-soundness risks versus harms to the institution.
Three-Member Panel Rules
Each appeal to the Office will be assigned to a three-member panel, and final Guidelines require that each panel include at least one official with bank supervisory or examination experience and at least one official with industry experience. If vacancies or unavailability prevent a three-member panel, the Chairperson may allow the Office to proceed with fewer members or appoint temporary officials for up to 120 days.
Transparency, Publication, and Redaction Rules
The Office will publish decisions in summary or redacted form with rationale and may include dissents. Recommended redactions will be shared with the appealing institution before publication so the institution can raise concerns about possible identification. The FDIC will also explore publishing anonymized data about the number and outcomes of appeals.
Information Sharing and Ex Parte Rules
Materials submitted to the Office by either supervisory divisions or appealing institutions must be shared with the other party on a timely basis. Any ex parte communications concerning the substance of an appeal between the Office and supervisory staff must be shared in writing, and redactions must be explained to the appealing institution.
New Evidence and Panel Approval
The Guidelines allow new evidence to be submitted to the Office if approved by the reviewing panel and with a reasonable time provided for the Division Director to review and respond. This balances appellate review with limits on introducing new facts after the original determination.
Legal Division Review of Decisions
The Legal Division will review Office draft decisions for consistency with laws, regulations, and FDIC policy and may notify the Chairperson's Office if a decision is contrary to law or policy, requiring revision. The Legal Division will not opine on the merits and procedural eligibility determinations will be provided to the appealing institution with written explanation.
Waiver Powers Limited
The Office, with concurrence of the Legal Division, may waive deadlines or procedural requirements for good cause, but waiver authority does not extend to qualifications of reviewing officials, the standard of review, or the types of determinations that may be appealed.
Ombudsman Oversight and Retaliation Monitoring
The Office of the Ombudsman will serve as a non-voting participant and will have neutral oversight of the process, including monitoring for examiner retaliation. Institutions are instructed to contact the Ombudsman with concerns about retaliation.
Personalized for You
How does this regulation affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this federal register document means for your household, plus every other regulation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Key Dates
Department and Agencies
Related Federal Register Documents
2026-17823, Unsafe or Unsound Practices, Matters Requiring Attention
The OCC and FDIC are rolling out a new rule starting November 2, 2026, that clearly defines what counts as 'unsafe or unsound practices' for banks and savings institutions. This update helps banks focus on big financial risks instead of small paperwork issues, making supervision smarter and fairer. Banks will need to adjust how they handle these risks, which could affect their operations and how they communicate with regulators.
2026-08298, Regulatory Capital Rule: Community Bank Leverage Ratio Framework
Starting July 1, 2026, community banks get a break! The minimum leverage ratio drops from 9% to 8%, making it easier for smaller banks to meet rules. Plus, banks can now stay in this easier framework longer—up to four straight quarters instead of two—helping them manage their money better without rushing.
2026-05960, Regulatory Capital Rules: Regulatory Capital and Standardized Approach for Risk-Weighted Assets
Big banks and community banks are getting new rules to better measure the risks in their loans and investments. The changes update how banks count certain assets and income when figuring out their safety net money, called regulatory capital. These updates aim to make banks safer and smarter with their money, with some rules kicking in soon and affecting how much capital banks need to hold.
2025-21626, Regulatory Capital Rule: Modifications to the Enhanced Supplementary Leverage Ratio Standards for U.S. Global Systemically Important Bank Holding Companies and Their Subsidiary Depository Institutions; Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity and Long-Term Debt Requirements for U.S. Global Systemically Important Bank Holding Companies
Big U.S. banks that are super important to the economy are getting new rules to keep them safer and stronger. These changes tweak how much money they must keep on hand and how they handle long-term debt, helping prevent financial trouble. The new rules kick in soon and could affect how these banks manage billions in assets and debt.
2025-21625, Regulatory Capital Rule: Revisions to the Community Bank Leverage Ratio Framework
The government wants to make it easier for small banks to stay in a special low-risk capital program by lowering the required leverage ratio from 9% to 8%. They’re also giving banks more time—up to four quarters instead of two—to fix any issues without losing their spot. Banks and bank holding companies should weigh in by January 30, 2026, as these changes could save them money and reduce red tape.
2026-20433, Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records
The FDIC is getting rid of two old record systems used for hiring because they’re now covered by a bigger government system. This change affects job applicants and makes record-keeping simpler and more efficient. It takes effect on October 6, 2026, with no extra costs involved.
Previous / Next Documents
Previous: 2026-01432, Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Automated Export System
The U.S. Census Bureau is asking to keep using the Automated Export System (AES) to collect export data without any changes. This system helps businesses report what they export, and the government uses this info to track trade and make smart economic decisions. Over 16 million exporters spend about 3 minutes each filing, and the public has 30 more days to share their thoughts.
Next: 2026-01434, Rescission of Office for Civil Rights Documents Under Executive Order 14192
The Department of Health and Human Services’ Office for Civil Rights is officially canceling some old guidance documents to clear up confusion and cut unnecessary costs for hospitals and other health groups. This change takes effect right now, so affected organizations can stop following outdated rules and save money. It’s all part of a bigger plan to make government work smarter and simpler.