Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Extension: Regulation S-AM
Published Date: 1/30/2026
Notice
Summary
The SEC is asking to keep the rules in Regulation S-AM that protect consumers from unwanted marketing by financial companies linked to their affiliates. About 2,282 companies must give clear notices and easy ways for people to say no to these ads, while around 12,781 companies spend a little time checking their marketing practices. This update keeps things running smoothly without adding new costs or big changes.
Analyzed Economic Effects
2 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 1 costs, 0 mixed.
Annual Compliance Time and Cost Burden on Firms
About 12,781 SEC-registered Covered Persons that have one or more affiliates spend an estimated average of 0.20 hours per year reviewing affiliate marketing practices, while about 2,282 firms spend an average 7.6 hours per year on notices, opt-outs, recordkeeping, and consumer questions. The staff estimates a total annual time burden of about 19,899 hours and total annual internal compliance costs of about $5,897,625.
Limits on Affiliate Marketing; Consumer Opt-Outs
Regulation S-AM stops certain financial firms from using consumer financial information received from an affiliate to solicit you for marketing unless you are given a clear notice and a reasonable, simple way to opt out. The rule potentially covers firms registered with the SEC (about 22,824 Covered Persons) and specifically applies to the roughly 2,282 firms that must provide affiliate marketing notices and opt-out opportunities.
Personalized for You
How does this regulation affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this federal register document means for your household, plus every other regulation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Key Dates
Department and Agencies
Related Federal Register Documents
2026-19260, Rescission of Rule 14a-8's Federal Regulation of Shareholder Proposals and Amendments to Rule 14a-4
The SEC wants to stop its federal rule that controls how shareholders can make proposals at company meetings, letting state laws and company rules take over instead. They’re also changing rules so companies can sometimes vote on proposals not in their official materials—but shareholders can opt out if they want. This affects investors and companies, with comments open until November 20, 2026, and could shake up how shareholder voices are heard and counted.
2026-18424, Political Contributions by Certain Investment Advisers
The Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission" or the "SEC") is proposing to rescind the political contribution rule under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the "Advisers Act"), which prohibits investment advisers from providing investment advisory services for compensation to a government client for two years after an adviser or any covered associate of the adviser makes a contribution to certain categories of elected officials or candidates, among other prohibitions. In the more than fifteen years since the rule was adopted, implementation challenges associated with the political contribution rule have resulted in a range of significant unintended consequences, including compliance practices among some investment advisers that may have had the effect of restricting all political contributions by the investment advisers and their employees. Market participants also have stated that the political contribution rule is burdensome, complex, and both lacks clarity and creates a de facto strict liability standard. The Commission is of the view that other existing requirements of the Advisers Act and its associated rules, including prohibitions on fraud, fiduciary duty requirements, the compliance rule, and the code of ethics rule (defined below), are likely sufficient to address pay-to-play practices while allowing an adviser the flexibility to implement an approach that is more appropriately tailored to its particular risks, rendering the political contribution rule unnecessary. The Commission also is proposing to amend the rule under the Advisers Act pertaining to books and records consistent with the proposed rescission.
2026-18190, Transfer Agent Rules
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC" or "Commission") is proposing to adopt new rules, amend existing rules, amend the existing form for registration with the Commission as a transfer agent (Form TA-1) and the existing form for reporting activities of transfer agents (Form TA-2), and rescind an existing rule governing registered transfer agents. The proposals are designed to modernize the rules governing registered transfer agents.
2026-17183, Regulation Crypto Assets
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") is proposing new rules to create a tailored offering regime for certain investment contracts involving crypto assets. The proposed offering regime is intended to facilitate capital formation and accommodate innovation within the crypto asset markets while, at the same time, ensuring that investors are adequately protected and provided with the information they need to make informed investment decisions. The proposed rules would be set forth in a new regulation titled "Regulation Crypto Assets" and would include two exemptions from the registration requirements of section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933. The first exemption would permit offerings of up to $5 million during a four-year period. The second exemption would permit offerings of up to $75 million during each 12-month period. Under both exemptions, issuers would be required to make certain principles-based narrative disclosures available to their investors. In addition, issuers under the second exemption would be required to provide financial statements and would be subject to ongoing reporting requirements. Issuers that rely on these exemptions would remain subject to the antifraud and antimanipulation provisions of the Federal securities laws. The proposed rules also would include a conditional safe harbor from the term "investment contract" in the definitions of "security" in the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If the conditions of that proposed safe harbor are satisfied, then a crypto asset would be deemed not to be subject to an investment contract for purposes of those definitions of "security."
2026-12163, The Trade-Through Rule and Locked and Crossed Markets Provisions of Regulation NMS
The SEC wants to scrap some old rules that stop stocks from being traded at worse prices and prevent confusing market quotes. This change affects stock traders and exchanges, aiming to simplify trading and possibly speed things up. If you want to share your thoughts, you’ve got until August 17, 2026, so don’t miss out!
2026-10373, Registered Offering Reform
The SEC wants to make it easier and cheaper for more companies to sell their stocks and bonds to the public. They’re opening up special forms and benefits to more businesses, updating rules to be more modern, and cutting red tape by overriding some state rules. If you’re a company planning to raise money, these changes could speed things up and save you money, with feedback due by July 27, 2026.
Previous / Next Documents
Previous: 2026-01887, Port of Moses Lake-Acquisition Exemption-Moses Lake, Wash
The Port of Moses Lake is officially buying a short rail line near Grant County International Airport from Columbia Basin Railroad. This move is part of a bigger railroad project and lets the Port expand its rail operations without big revenue changes. The deal kicks in on February 20, 2026, with Columbia Basin Railroad running the trains once everything’s set.
Next: 2026-01889, Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Extension: Rule 17a-14 and Form CRS
The SEC is asking to keep collecting info from broker-dealers who work with everyday investors. These firms must keep sharing easy-to-understand summaries about their services, fees, and any conflicts, helping investors make smart choices. This update keeps the rules going with no big changes, and it costs firms about $142,554 yearly while taking over 7 million hours combined to comply.