Project-Level Predecisional Administrative Review Process
Published Date: 2/6/2026
Proposed Rule
Summary
The Forest Service is updating how people can raise concerns about projects on national forests before decisions are made. These changes will make the review process faster and simpler, helping everyone understand and participate better. If you want to share your thoughts, make sure to comment by March 9, 2026—no extra costs, just a smoother way to speak up!
Analyzed Economic Effects
6 provisions identified: 2 benefits, 4 costs, 0 mixed.
Much shorter public comment windows
If you want to comment on a Forest Service environmental assessment (EA), you will have 10 days instead of 30 days. If you want to comment on an environmental impact statement (EIS), you will have 20 days instead of 45 days.
Shorter objection filing deadlines
If you plan to file an objection, objections to a draft Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) must be filed within 10 days and objections to a draft Record of Decision (ROD) must be filed within 20 days. The rule also states objection periods would not be extended.
Page limits and faster responses for objections
Objections would be limited to 15 pages for EAs and 30 pages for EISs. The responsible official must issue a written objection response of no more than 5 pages within 15 days for EAs or 20 days for EISs after the objection period ends, with no extension allowed.
More projects excluded from objection process
Certain projects would not be subject to the objection process: projects that received no timely, substantive written comments; FONSIs or RODs updated or issued without changing the Agency's finding or decision; projects relying on prior objection or similar review; and projects developed under statutory emergency authorities.
Move notices and responses to USDA website
The Forest Service would stop publishing legal notices in newspapers or the Federal Register and would post notices and objection responses on the USDA website where the EA, EIS, FONSI, or ROD is published. The agency would also stop accepting facsimile submissions and external media and would stop mailing objection responses.
Single streamlined review led by responsible official
The rule eliminates the separate 'reviewing officer' and removes an extra level of review above the responsible official so that the responsible official and their team handle objection review. The objection process will be the same for HFRA and non-HFRA projects except that HFRA projects will not have emergency authority.
Personalized for You
How does this regulation affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this federal register document means for your household, plus every other regulation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Key Dates
Department and Agencies
Related Federal Register Documents
2026-16965, Special Areas; Roadless Area Conservation
The USDA wants to cancel the 2001 Roadless Rule that stopped road building and logging in special forest areas. This change gives local forest managers more freedom to decide how to care for these lands based on local needs. People have until September 21, 2026, to share their thoughts, and this could affect how forests are managed and how money is spent on these lands.
2026-18242, Proposed Recreation Fee Sites
The Malheur National Forest is proposing to establish several recreation fee sites. Proposed recreation fees collected at the proposed recreation fee sites would be used for operation, maintenance, and improvement of the sites. An analysis of nearby recreation fee sites with similar amenities shows that the proposed recreation fees are reasonable and typical of similar recreation fee sites in the area.
2026-18239, Proposed Recreation Fee Sites
The Ouachita National Forest plans to start charging fees at some picnic and recreation spots to help keep them clean, safe, and fun. Groups using picnic sites like Cedar Lake will pay $50 a day, and reservations will cost an extra $8 online. These changes could start about six months after this notice, making your outdoor adventures even better!
2026-18244, Proposed Recreation Fee Sites
The Cleveland National Forest is proposing to establish two special recreation permits. Proposed recreation fees collected at the proposed special recreation permit sites would be used for operation, maintenance, and improvement of the sites and the special recreation use covered by the proposed special recreation permit. An analysis of nearby special recreation uses with similar amenities shows that the proposed recreation fees are reasonable and typical of similar special recreation uses in the area.
2026-18243, Proposed Recreation Fee Site
The Six Rivers National Forest is proposing to establish a new recreation fee site. Proposed recreation fees collected at the proposed recreation fee site would be used for operation, maintenance, and improvement of the site. An analysis of nearby recreation fee sites with similar amenities shows that the proposed recreation fee is reasonable and typical of similar recreation fee sites in the area.
2026-18238, Proposed Recreation Fee Sites
The Green Mountain and Finger Lakes National Forests are proposing to establish several recreation fee sites. Proposed recreation fees collected at the proposed recreation fee sites would be used for operation, maintenance, and improvement of the sites. An analysis of nearby recreation fee sites with similar amenities shows that the proposed recreation fees are reasonable and typical of similar recreation fee sites.
Previous / Next Documents
Previous: 2026-02381, Air Plan Approval; Pennsylvania; Proposed Revision to Philadelphia Gas Works, Richmond Plant Reasonably Available Control Technology Plan Under the 1997 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards
The EPA wants to approve a change to Pennsylvania’s plan for controlling pollution at the Philadelphia Gas Works Richmond Plant. This update removes an old rule but doesn’t change how much pollution the plant can release. People can share their thoughts by March 9, 2026, but no new costs or pollution limits are involved.
Next: 2026-02416, Airworthiness Directives; Dassault Aviation Airplanes
If you own or operate certain Dassault Falcon jets, the FAA wants you to update your maintenance plans with new, stricter safety rules to keep flying safe. This update builds on last year’s rules and aims to fix potential safety issues. You’ve got until March 23, 2026, to share your thoughts, and while these changes might cost some time and money, they’re all about keeping those Falcons flying strong and safe.