SEC Considers Pausing New Stock Trading Fee Rules for MEMX
Published Date: 3/25/2026
Notice
Summary
MEMX LLC asked the SEC to pause some new rules about stock price steps and fees that started in 2024. This pause would affect all trading centers and lets them charge a slightly higher fee for certain stocks priced under $1 or with specific price increments. The SEC wants your thoughts before deciding, so this could impact how much trading costs and when changes happen.
Analyzed Economic Effects
3 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 1 costs, 1 mixed.
Delay of Fee-Cap Changes for Certain Stocks
MEMX asked the SEC to temporarily delay implementing the amended Rule 610(c) for (a) protected quotations and best bids/offers in NMS stocks that would continue to use a $0.01 minimum pricing increment under Rule 612(b)(2)(i), and (b) protected quotations and best bids/offers in NMS stocks priced below $1.00 per share. The amendments to Rule 610(c) that could be delayed include the access-fee caps the Commission adopted in September 2024 (for example, $0.001 per share for quotations priced $1.00 or more and 0.1% of quotation price for quotations priced under $1.00).
Request to Allow Higher Access Fee ($0.0015)
MEMX asked the SEC to allow exchanges to charge an access fee of up to $0.0015 per share by modifying the $0.0010 amended access-fee cap for NMS stocks that would be subject to a $0.005 minimum pricing increment under Rule 612(b)(2)(ii). The application also notes that, if relief is granted, protected quotations in such $0.005-increment stocks could face different caps by price (e.g., $0.001 or $0.0015 per share for quotations $1.00 or more and 0.3% of the quotation price for quotations below $1.00).
Implementation of $0.005 Tick to Reduce Spreads
MEMX says the minimum pricing increment changes in Rule 612 would set a $0.005 minimum pricing increment for bids, offers, orders and indications of interest priced at $1.00 or more per share (Rule 612(b)(2)(ii)), and that implementing this $0.005 increment would reduce bid-ask spreads and improve investor trading outcomes. MEMX asks that the $0.005 minimum pricing increment be able to be implemented in November 2026 without further delay while other Rule 610(c) access-fee issues are deliberated.
Personalized for You
How does this regulation affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this federal register document means for your household, plus every other regulation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Key Dates
Department and Agencies
Related Federal Register Documents
2026-20466, Adviser and Regulated Fund Custody Rules; Crypto Custody Rules
The SEC is updating rules for how investment advisers and funds handle crypto assets, making sure they keep these digital investments safe and properly reported. These changes affect advisers, funds, and anyone managing crypto securities, aiming to modernize rules and improve transparency. Comments on the proposal are open until December 7, 2026, so get ready to weigh in!
2026-19260, Rescission of Rule 14a-8's Federal Regulation of Shareholder Proposals and Amendments to Rule 14a-4
The SEC wants to stop its federal rule that controls how shareholders can make proposals at company meetings, letting state laws and company rules take over instead. They’re also changing rules so companies can sometimes vote on proposals not in their official materials—but shareholders can opt out if they want. This affects investors and companies, with comments open until November 20, 2026, and could shake up how shareholder voices are heard and counted.
2026-18424, Political Contributions by Certain Investment Advisers
The Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission" or the "SEC") is proposing to rescind the political contribution rule under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the "Advisers Act"), which prohibits investment advisers from providing investment advisory services for compensation to a government client for two years after an adviser or any covered associate of the adviser makes a contribution to certain categories of elected officials or candidates, among other prohibitions. In the more than fifteen years since the rule was adopted, implementation challenges associated with the political contribution rule have resulted in a range of significant unintended consequences, including compliance practices among some investment advisers that may have had the effect of restricting all political contributions by the investment advisers and their employees. Market participants also have stated that the political contribution rule is burdensome, complex, and both lacks clarity and creates a de facto strict liability standard. The Commission is of the view that other existing requirements of the Advisers Act and its associated rules, including prohibitions on fraud, fiduciary duty requirements, the compliance rule, and the code of ethics rule (defined below), are likely sufficient to address pay-to-play practices while allowing an adviser the flexibility to implement an approach that is more appropriately tailored to its particular risks, rendering the political contribution rule unnecessary. The Commission also is proposing to amend the rule under the Advisers Act pertaining to books and records consistent with the proposed rescission.
2026-18190, Transfer Agent Rules
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC" or "Commission") is proposing to adopt new rules, amend existing rules, amend the existing form for registration with the Commission as a transfer agent (Form TA-1) and the existing form for reporting activities of transfer agents (Form TA-2), and rescind an existing rule governing registered transfer agents. The proposals are designed to modernize the rules governing registered transfer agents.
2026-17183, Regulation Crypto Assets
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") is proposing new rules to create a tailored offering regime for certain investment contracts involving crypto assets. The proposed offering regime is intended to facilitate capital formation and accommodate innovation within the crypto asset markets while, at the same time, ensuring that investors are adequately protected and provided with the information they need to make informed investment decisions. The proposed rules would be set forth in a new regulation titled "Regulation Crypto Assets" and would include two exemptions from the registration requirements of section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933. The first exemption would permit offerings of up to $5 million during a four-year period. The second exemption would permit offerings of up to $75 million during each 12-month period. Under both exemptions, issuers would be required to make certain principles-based narrative disclosures available to their investors. In addition, issuers under the second exemption would be required to provide financial statements and would be subject to ongoing reporting requirements. Issuers that rely on these exemptions would remain subject to the antifraud and antimanipulation provisions of the Federal securities laws. The proposed rules also would include a conditional safe harbor from the term "investment contract" in the definitions of "security" in the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If the conditions of that proposed safe harbor are satisfied, then a crypto asset would be deemed not to be subject to an investment contract for purposes of those definitions of "security."
2026-12163, The Trade-Through Rule and Locked and Crossed Markets Provisions of Regulation NMS
The SEC wants to scrap some old rules that stop stocks from being traded at worse prices and prevent confusing market quotes. This change affects stock traders and exchanges, aiming to simplify trading and possibly speed things up. If you want to share your thoughts, you’ve got until August 17, 2026, so don’t miss out!
Previous / Next Documents
Previous: 2026-05765, Michael W. Williams-Control Exemption-McCloud Railway Company; Ozark Valley Railroad, Inc.; and Washington & Idaho Railway, Inc.
Michael W. Williams asked for official permission to control three small railroads: McCloud Railway, Ozark Valley Railroad, and Washington & Idaho Railway. The Surface Transportation Board reviewed his request and said yes, giving him the green light after some earlier back-and-forth. This means Williams can now legally manage these railroads, with no new fees or delays announced.
Next: 2026-05769, Information Collection: NRC Form 754, Armed Security Personnel Firearms Background Check
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is renewing its form for checking the backgrounds of armed security personnel who carry firearms. This update affects security staff at nuclear sites and keeps safety checks running smoothly without extra costs or delays. If you have thoughts, send them by April 24, 2026, to help shape the process!