EdTech Consortium Shuffles Global Schools and Companies
Published Date: 3/26/2026
Notice
Summary
The 1EdTech Consortium just updated its membership by adding new schools and companies from around the world while some others have left. These changes keep the group’s special legal protections against big antitrust lawsuits in place, helping members focus on teamwork without worrying about costly legal battles. No money changes now, but the group will keep sharing updates as new members join or leave.
Analyzed Economic Effects
3 provisions identified: 2 benefits, 1 costs, 0 mixed.
New Members Gain Antitrust Protection
On October 31, 2025, 1EdTech Consortium added organizations (including Rockwell Information Systems; University of Bremen; Dallas College; Rutgers University; Delft University of Technology; TruScholar; Impierce Technologies; Audio Enhancement; Des Moines Area Community College; and others) and filed notifications to extend the Act's protection that limits antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages. As parties to this venture, those added organizations are covered by that limitation on recovery.
Withdrawn Members Lose Venture Protection
Several organizations (including Digital Respons-Ability; University of Nottingham Online; State University of New York System; California IT in Education; SCIVR, Inc.; Idaho Education Technology Association; StrongMind) withdrew as parties to the 1EdTech Consortium. Those withdrawn organizations are no longer parties to the venture and therefore are not covered by the Act's limitation on recovery for this consortium.
Consortium Membership Remains Open
The notice states that membership in the 1EdTech Consortium remains open and that the consortium intends to file additional notifications whenever members join or leave. Organizations considering joining can seek to become parties to the venture and be included under the Act's limitation on recovery by filing and being listed.
Personalized for You
How does this regulation affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this federal register document means for your household, plus every other regulation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Key Dates
Department and Agencies
Related Federal Register Documents
2026-19100, United States of America, et al. v. RealPage, Inc., et al.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement
The U.S. government is stopping Pinnacle Property Management from using RealPage’s pricing software that shares sensitive info with landlords, which broke competition rules. Pinnacle must also set up new rules to keep things fair and help the government watch over this. People have 60 days to share their thoughts before the court makes it official.
2026-18136, United States v. KKR & Co. Inc., et al.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement
The U.S. government caught KKR & Co. Inc. for not properly reporting important business deals before they happened—16 times! Now, KKR has to pay a huge $250 million fine within 30 days to settle the case. This action helps keep big business honest and fair for everyone.
2026-16850, United States of America, et al. v. CRH PLC, et al. Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement
The U.S. government and Tennessee are stopping APAC-Tennessee from buying Standard Construction Group because it could hurt competition. To fix this, both companies must sell two key facilities in Memphis and Millington, Tennessee. People have 60 days to share their thoughts before the deal is finalized, keeping the market fair and open.
2026-16112, United States et al. v. Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. et al.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement
2026-14903, United States, et al. v. OhioHealth Corporation; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement
The U.S. government and Ohio are taking on OhioHealth Corporation for using sneaky contract rules that stop insurers from offering cheaper health plans. OhioHealth must now remove these rules and promise not to use them again, helping more budget-friendly options reach patients. People have 60 days to share their thoughts before the court makes it official.
2026-14935, United States v. Edwards LifeSciences Corp. and Genesis MedTech Group Limited; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement
The U.S. government says Edwards LifeSciences broke the rules when it bought JC Medical from Genesis MedTech. Edwards must pay $10 million, Genesis pays $2 million, and Edwards has to get approval before buying any company working on special heart valve devices in the U.S. This keeps the market fair and protects competition in heart health tech.
Previous / Next Documents
Previous: 2026-05907, Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-ODVA, Inc.
ODVA, Inc. just updated its team by adding two new members from Hungary and Germany, while four others from Brazil, Denmark, Germany, and Switzerland stepped away. These changes keep ODVA’s special legal protections in place, helping the group work together without big antitrust risks. If you’re involved or interested, keep an eye out—membership is still open and more updates could come soon!
Next: 2026-05909, Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Rust Foundation
The Rust Foundation just updated its team by adding three new members from the UK, France, and California, while one member from California left. These changes keep the group’s special legal protections in place, helping them work together without big legal risks. If you’re involved or interested, keep an eye out because membership is still open and more updates will come.