Fed Updates Risk Formulas for Mega-Banks
Published Date: 3/27/2026
Proposed Rule
Summary
Big banks that matter most to the U.S. economy will see changes in how their risk-based capital surcharges are calculated. The new rules tweak formulas, smooth out data bumps, and update reports to better match real-world risks, with adjustments for growth and inflation each year. These updates aim to keep our financial system safer, and banks need to get ready by June 18, 2026, to share their thoughts.
Analyzed Economic Effects
9 provisions identified: 3 benefits, 1 costs, 5 mixed.
One-time Cut to Method 2 Coefficients
The rule would apply a one-time downward adjustment to the fixed Method 2 coefficients by a factor of 1.2 to reflect changes since implementation. The Board describes this 1.2 factor as equal to the observed 20-percentage-point divergence in cumulative growth between Method 2 and Method 1 scores since Q4 2019.
Annual Indexing of Coefficients to GDP
After the one-time adjustment, the Board would annually index Method 2 coefficients using a three-year moving average of nominal U.S. GDP growth. The Board would not adjust coefficients if the three-year moving average of nominal GDP growth is negative, and it expects to publish updated coefficients and the GDP growth scalar each year in the fourth quarter.
Short-Term Wholesale Funding Measure Changed
The proposal would modify the weighted short-term wholesale funding systemic indicator to measure an absolute amount rather than a ratio scaled to a firm's average risk-weighted assets, and set a new coefficient so the indicator represents approximately 20 percent of total Method 2 weighted basis points.
Average Reporting for Certain Indicators
For certain systemic indicators that are currently measured on a single year-end date, the proposal would require firms to calculate them as annual averages of daily or monthly values instead of point-in-time snapshots. This is intended to reduce the effects of temporary changes around measurement dates.
Narrower Method 2 Score Bands
The proposal would introduce narrower Method 2 score band ranges to reduce cliff effects and make GSIB surcharges more sensitive to changes in a firm's systemic risk profile.
Updates to Measurement and Definitions
The proposal would make multiple improvements to measurement of systemic indicators, including clarifications to the definition of 'financial institution' and the treatment of exchange-traded funds, updates to derivatives and securities outstanding measurement, trading volume and payments activity details (including currencies), and changes to cross-jurisdictional activity indicators.
FR Y-15 Reporting Clarifications and Streamlining
The proposal would amend the FR Y-15 Systemic Risk Report instructions and form to improve the consistency of data reporting and streamline the reporting process for respondents that file the FR Y-15 quarterly. The FR Y-15 applies to U.S. bank holding companies and covered savings and loan holding companies with $100 billion or more in consolidated assets and certain foreign banking organizations.
Clarification on In-Year Surcharge Reductions
The proposal includes a clarification regarding reduction in a GSIB surcharge calculated during the year between calculation and the effective date of a GSIB surcharge increase, as part of the amendments to the GSIB framework.
Foreign Banking Organization Reporting Changes
The proposal would include amendments related to reporting requirements for foreign banking organizations that have combined U.S. assets of $100 billion or more, as reflected in the FR Y-15 and related GSIB measurement changes.
Your PRIA Score
Personalized for You
How does this regulation affect your finances?
Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this federal register document and every other regulation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Key Dates
Related Federal Register Documents
2025-21626 — Regulatory Capital Rule: Modifications to the Enhanced Supplementary Leverage Ratio Standards for U.S. Global Systemically Important Bank Holding Companies and Their Subsidiary Depository Institutions; Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity and Long-Term Debt Requirements for U.S. Global Systemically Important Bank Holding Companies
Big U.S. banks that are super important to the economy are getting new rules to keep them safer and stronger. These changes tweak how much money they must keep on hand and how they handle long-term debt, helping prevent financial trouble. The new rules kick in soon and could affect how these banks manage billions in assets and debt.
2026-09891 — Notice of Proposals To Engage in or To Acquire Companies Engaged in Permissible Nonbanking Activities
Some companies want to start or buy businesses that do activities related to banking but aren’t banks themselves. The Federal Reserve is letting the public know and asking for comments by June 2, 2026. This helps keep banking safe and fair while allowing new business moves across the U.S.
2026-09890 — Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank or Bank Holding Company
If you want to buy or control shares in a bank or bank holding company, you need to tell the Federal Reserve first. They’re reviewing requests like the Mahar Family’s plan to keep control of their bank in North Dakota. If you want to share your thoughts, you’ve got until June 2, 2026, to speak up—so don’t miss the deadline!
2026-09806 — Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank or Bank Holding Company
Some families and trusts want to buy more shares in a bank and its holding company in Kansas. The Federal Reserve is checking their applications and wants the public to share thoughts by June 1, 2026. This process helps keep bank ownership clear and fair, making sure big money moves get a thumbs-up before they happen.
2026-09529 — Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank or Bank Holding Company
If you want to buy or control a bank or bank holding company, you need to tell the Federal Reserve and wait for approval. People affected include those trying to buy shares in banks like Grant County Bank or Cattlemens Bank. You’ve got until May 28, 2026, to send your comments, so don’t miss the deadline if you want to have your say!
2026-09390 — Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding Companies
Bank companies want to grow by forming new groups, buying other banks, or merging with them. If you’re involved with these banks or just curious, you can share your thoughts by June 11, 2026. These moves could change who controls local banks and might affect money and services in your community.
Previous / Next Documents
Previous: 2026-05960 — Regulatory Capital Rules: Regulatory Capital and Standardized Approach for Risk-Weighted Assets
Big banks and community banks are getting new rules to better measure the risks in their loans and investments. The changes update how banks count certain assets and income when figuring out their safety net money, called regulatory capital. These updates aim to make banks safer and smarter with their money, with some rules kicking in soon and affecting how much capital banks need to hold.
Next: 2026-05977 — Perchloroethylene (PCE) and Carbon Tetrachloride (CTC); Regulation Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA); Compliance Date Extensions
The EPA is giving businesses and federal agencies more time to follow safety rules for handling two chemicals, PCE and CTC. Non-federal owners and operators now have until mid-2027 or late 2027 to complete key safety steps like monitoring exposure and providing protective gear. This extension helps everyone get ready without rushing, potentially saving money and avoiding penalties.