FSOC Sharpens Tools to Tame Wall Street's Nonbank Behemoths
Published Date: 3/30/2026
Proposed Rule
Summary
The Financial Stability Oversight Council is updating how it watches over big nonbank financial companies to keep the U.S. economy safe. They’re focusing more on the activities these companies do, making their process clearer and smarter. If you’re involved with these companies, get ready to share your thoughts by May 14, 2026, as this could affect how they’re supervised and regulated.
Analyzed Economic Effects
7 provisions identified: 3 benefits, 3 costs, 1 mixed.
Council Prioritizes Activities-Based Review
The Council would prioritize an activities-based approach when identifying and addressing risks to U.S. financial stability and would pursue entity-specific designations under section 113 only if an activities-based approach cannot adequately address the risk. This re-establishes the approach first introduced in 2019 and would generally make entity-specific designations a secondary step.
Higher 'Threat' Threshold for Designations
The Proposed Guidance would interpret a “threat to the financial stability of the United States” to mean an impairment of financial intermediation or market functioning sufficient to inflict severe damage on the broader U.S. economy. This is a higher threshold than the 2023 Analytic Framework's “substantially impair” standard.
Cost-Benefit Required Before Designation
Before making any section 113 designation, the Council would perform a cost-benefit analysis and would make a designation only if expected benefits to financial stability justify the expected costs. The Council would quantify reasonably estimable benefits and costs (using ranges as appropriate) and would consider non‑quantified factors as well.
Council Lists Potential Designation Costs
When evaluating costs of a designation, the Council would consider company-level costs such as risk-management requirements, supervision and examination, liquidity requirements, potentially higher capital costs, and possible negative effects on a company's ability to innovate. The Council would also consider costs to the U.S. economy, including impacts on the availability and cost of credit.
Estimated 20-Hour Reporting Burden
The Paperwork Reduction Act section states the estimated total annual reporting burden associated with the collection of information in the Proposed Guidance is 20 hours, based on an estimate of 1 respondent, under OMB control number 1505-0244. The Council expects to rely on existing public and regulatory sources where possible to minimize burdens.
180-Day Timeline to Address Material Risks
Based on preliminary evaluation, the Council intends to identify steps a nonbank financial company or regulators could take to address a potential threat and generally expects material risks to be addressed within 180 days, subject to any necessary administrative procedures.
Asset Valuations Added as Vulnerability
The Proposed Guidance would add asset valuations to the list of types of vulnerabilities the Council would consider when identifying risks, and would remove the previous category labeled “destabilizing activities.” The guidance also discusses complexity, opacity, resolvability, and regulatory gaps as factors in risk analysis.
Your PRIA Score
Personalized for You
How does this regulation affect your finances?
Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this federal register document and every other regulation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Key Dates
Department and Agencies
Related Federal Register Documents
2026-14238 — Airworthiness Directives; Bell Textron Canada Limited Helicopters
If you fly Bell Model 407 helicopters, listen up! The FAA wants you to check your tailboom bolts more often, tighten them right, and swap out any worn parts to keep things safe. Plus, you’ll need to update your maintenance manual with new bolt life limits—all to stop bolts from breaking and keep your chopper flying strong. Comments on this plan are open until August 31, 2026.
2026-14282 — Air Plan Approval; Wisconsin; Source-Specific Air Quality Implementation Plan; Oak Creek Power Plant
The EPA wants to approve new nitrogen oxide (NOX) pollution limits for Wisconsin’s Oak Creek Power Plant. These new limits let the plant keep running while cutting pollution more than before, helping keep the air clean and safe. People can share their thoughts on this plan until August 14, 2026, but no big costs or delays are expected.
2026-14260 — Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Control of NOX Emissions From Large Stationary Internal Combustion Engines
The EPA wants to approve updates to Missouri’s rules for big stationary engines that release nitrogen oxides (NOX), a harmful air pollutant. These updates simplify reporting, add clear definitions, remove confusing rules, and exempt some spark-ignited engines. If you’re involved with these engines, get ready for smoother rules and make sure to share your thoughts by August 14, 2026!
2026-14261 — Approval of Source-Specific Air Quality Implementation Plan; New York; Castleton Power, LLC
The EPA is proposing to approve a plan that helps Castleton Power in New York cut down on pollution from its big power machines. This plan uses smart technology to reduce harmful nitrogen oxide emissions, keeping the air cleaner and meeting important ozone rules. People can share their thoughts on this plan until August 14, 2026, and the changes aim to protect the environment without extra costs.
2026-14281 — Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG Engines
The FAA wants all Rolls-Royce Deutschland BR700-725A1-12 engines to follow new, stricter rules for checking and replacing parts that wear out over time. This means operators must update their maintenance plans to keep engines safe and sound. Comments on this proposal are open until August 31, 2026, so affected operators should act fast to avoid surprises and extra costs later.
2026-14208 — Reforming and Modernizing the NRC's Radiation Protection Framework
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission wants to update its rules on radiation safety to keep up with new science and technology since 1991. These changes affect anyone working with or around nuclear materials, aiming to make radiation protection clearer and stronger. You’ve got until August 31, 2026, to share your thoughts, and these updates could impact safety costs and procedures in the near future.
Previous / Next Documents
Previous: 2026-06103 — Softwood Lumber Board Assessment Rate Clarification and Changes to Membership
If you import softwood lumber into the U.S. or are part of the Softwood Lumber Board, listen up! The USDA wants to clear up how much you pay in fees and change who gets to be on the Board. These updates could affect your costs and membership starting soon, so get ready to share your thoughts by April 29, 2026.
Next: 2026-06173 — Single Family Housing Guaranteed Loan Program-Income Producing Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Provisions
The USDA’s Rural Housing Service wants to update its loan program so people can get loans to buy homes with one or more income-producing Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). This means homeowners can finance properties that include rental units or spaces for home-based work. If you’re interested, make sure to send your comments by June 1, 2026!