FSOC Sharpens Tools to Tame Wall Street's Nonbank Behemoths
Published Date: 3/30/2026
Proposed Rule
Summary
The Financial Stability Oversight Council is updating how it watches over big nonbank financial companies to keep the U.S. economy safe. They’re focusing more on the activities these companies do, making their process clearer and smarter. If you’re involved with these companies, get ready to share your thoughts by May 14, 2026, as this could affect how they’re supervised and regulated.
Analyzed Economic Effects
7 provisions identified: 3 benefits, 3 costs, 1 mixed.
Council Prioritizes Activities-Based Review
The Council would prioritize an activities-based approach when identifying and addressing risks to U.S. financial stability and would pursue entity-specific designations under section 113 only if an activities-based approach cannot adequately address the risk. This re-establishes the approach first introduced in 2019 and would generally make entity-specific designations a secondary step.
Higher 'Threat' Threshold for Designations
The Proposed Guidance would interpret a “threat to the financial stability of the United States” to mean an impairment of financial intermediation or market functioning sufficient to inflict severe damage on the broader U.S. economy. This is a higher threshold than the 2023 Analytic Framework's “substantially impair” standard.
Cost-Benefit Required Before Designation
Before making any section 113 designation, the Council would perform a cost-benefit analysis and would make a designation only if expected benefits to financial stability justify the expected costs. The Council would quantify reasonably estimable benefits and costs (using ranges as appropriate) and would consider non‑quantified factors as well.
Council Lists Potential Designation Costs
When evaluating costs of a designation, the Council would consider company-level costs such as risk-management requirements, supervision and examination, liquidity requirements, potentially higher capital costs, and possible negative effects on a company's ability to innovate. The Council would also consider costs to the U.S. economy, including impacts on the availability and cost of credit.
Estimated 20-Hour Reporting Burden
The Paperwork Reduction Act section states the estimated total annual reporting burden associated with the collection of information in the Proposed Guidance is 20 hours, based on an estimate of 1 respondent, under OMB control number 1505-0244. The Council expects to rely on existing public and regulatory sources where possible to minimize burdens.
180-Day Timeline to Address Material Risks
Based on preliminary evaluation, the Council intends to identify steps a nonbank financial company or regulators could take to address a potential threat and generally expects material risks to be addressed within 180 days, subject to any necessary administrative procedures.
Asset Valuations Added as Vulnerability
The Proposed Guidance would add asset valuations to the list of types of vulnerabilities the Council would consider when identifying risks, and would remove the previous category labeled “destabilizing activities.” The guidance also discusses complexity, opacity, resolvability, and regulatory gaps as factors in risk analysis.
Your PRIA Score
Personalized for You
How does this regulation affect your finances?
Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this federal register document and every other regulation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Key Dates
Department and Agencies
Related Federal Register Documents
2026-10086 — Extending the Compliance Deadline for the PFOA and PFOS Maximum Contaminant Levels
The EPA is giving water systems more time to meet safety rules for two harmful chemicals, PFOA and PFOS, by extending the deadline from April 2029 to April 2031 if they ask for it. This helps water providers get ready without rushing, keeping our drinking water safe. The EPA wants your thoughts and will hold a public hearing in July 2026 to hear from everyone.
2026-10128 — Revision of Applications for Manufacturing and Procurement Quotas
The DEA wants to update how companies apply for permission to make and buy certain controlled drugs and chemicals. These changes will make the rules clearer, help prevent drug shortages, and ensure enough supply for medical and scientific needs. If you’re a manufacturer or involved in this process, get ready to follow new steps and share your thoughts by July 20, 2026.
2026-10085 — Rescission of Regulatory Determinations and Removal of Related Provisions for Four PFAS Substances (PFHxS, PFNA, HFPO-DA (GenX), and the Mixture of These Three PFAS Plus PFBS)
The EPA is proposing to undo its rules for four PFAS chemicals (PFHxS, PFNA, GenX, and a mix including PFBS) in drinking water because the original process wasn’t done right. This means public water systems won’t have to monitor or treat these chemicals for now. People and water providers should weigh in by July 20, 2026, and a virtual hearing happens July 7.
2026-10084 — Expanding Access to State Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs
The VA is making it easier and clearer for certain VA health workers to check State Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PDMPs) to keep an eye on prescription drug use. This change helps prevent medicine misuse and protects those checking the data while they do their jobs. Comments on this new rule are open until July 20, 2026, and it aims to make prescribing safer for veterans.
2026-10047 — Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes
The FAA wants all Airbus A330-841 and A330-941 airplanes to get regular checks for cracks on certain wing parts to keep flights safe. If cracks are found, fixes must be done right away. Comments on this plan are open until July 6, 2026, and these inspections might cost airlines some time and money but will help prevent bigger problems.
2026-10082 — Increasing the Fee for Certain Aliens Ordered Removed in Absentia as Established by the HR-1 Reconciliation Bill
The government plans to raise the fee from $5,130 to $18,000 for certain people who were ordered to leave the U.S. but didn’t and got caught later. This change affects those removed in absentia and includes yearly inflation updates to keep the fee current. Comments on this proposal are open until June 22, 2026, so now’s the time to speak up!
Previous / Next Documents
Previous: 2026-06103 — Softwood Lumber Board Assessment Rate Clarification and Changes to Membership
If you import softwood lumber into the U.S. or are part of the Softwood Lumber Board, listen up! The USDA wants to clear up how much you pay in fees and change who gets to be on the Board. These updates could affect your costs and membership starting soon, so get ready to share your thoughts by April 29, 2026.
Next: 2026-06173 — Single Family Housing Guaranteed Loan Program-Income Producing Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Provisions
The USDA’s Rural Housing Service wants to update its loan program so people can get loans to buy homes with one or more income-producing Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). This means homeowners can finance properties that include rental units or spaces for home-based work. If you’re interested, make sure to send your comments by June 1, 2026!