SEC Proposes to Scrap Corporate Climate Reporting Rules
Published Date: 6/3/2026
Proposed Rule
Summary
The SEC wants to cancel rules that made companies share climate-related info in their reports. This change affects public companies who no longer have to report on climate risks, saving them time and money. Comments on this proposal are open until August 3, 2026, so people can share their thoughts before it’s final.
Analyzed Economic Effects
4 provisions identified: 2 benefits, 0 costs, 2 mixed.
Rescinds mandatory climate disclosures
The SEC proposes to rescind the 2024 amendments that would have required registrants (public companies) to provide climate-related information in registration statements and annual reports. If finalized, public companies would no longer be required to make those mandated climate disclosures, removing the compliance obligation the Commission had adopted in 2024.
Eliminates GHG reporting and attestations
The Final Rules required large accelerated filers (LAFs) and certain accelerated filers (AFs) to disclose Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (expressed in CO2e), methodologies, and file attestation reports. The attestation timing in the Final Rules required an AF to file a limited-assurance attestation beginning the third fiscal year after the compliance date and an LAF to file limited assurance beginning the third fiscal year and reasonable assurance beginning the seventh fiscal year; the rescission would remove those requirements.
Removes board oversight and risk-management disclosures
Under the Final Rules, registrants had to disclose any board oversight of climate-related risks (regardless of materiality) and management's role in assessing and managing material climate-related risks, plus processes for identifying, assessing, and managing those risks. The proposed rescission would eliminate these mandated governance and risk-management climate disclosures.
Removes financial statement climate effects disclosures
The Final Rules required registrants to disclose financial statement effects of severe weather and other natural conditions (capitalized costs, expenditures expensed, charges, and losses, subject to one percent and de minimis thresholds) and costs related to carbon offsets and renewable energy credits (RECs) when material to climate-related targets. The proposed rescission would eliminate those mandated financial-statement climate disclosures.
Personalized for You
How does this regulation affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this federal register document means for your household, plus every other regulation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Key Dates
Department and Agencies
Related Federal Register Documents
2026-20466, Adviser and Regulated Fund Custody Rules; Crypto Custody Rules
The SEC is updating rules for how investment advisers and funds handle crypto assets, making sure they keep these digital investments safe and properly reported. These changes affect advisers, funds, and anyone managing crypto securities, aiming to modernize rules and improve transparency. Comments on the proposal are open until December 7, 2026, so get ready to weigh in!
2026-19260, Rescission of Rule 14a-8's Federal Regulation of Shareholder Proposals and Amendments to Rule 14a-4
The SEC wants to stop its federal rule that controls how shareholders can make proposals at company meetings, letting state laws and company rules take over instead. They’re also changing rules so companies can sometimes vote on proposals not in their official materials—but shareholders can opt out if they want. This affects investors and companies, with comments open until November 20, 2026, and could shake up how shareholder voices are heard and counted.
2026-18424, Political Contributions by Certain Investment Advisers
The Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission" or the "SEC") is proposing to rescind the political contribution rule under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the "Advisers Act"), which prohibits investment advisers from providing investment advisory services for compensation to a government client for two years after an adviser or any covered associate of the adviser makes a contribution to certain categories of elected officials or candidates, among other prohibitions. In the more than fifteen years since the rule was adopted, implementation challenges associated with the political contribution rule have resulted in a range of significant unintended consequences, including compliance practices among some investment advisers that may have had the effect of restricting all political contributions by the investment advisers and their employees. Market participants also have stated that the political contribution rule is burdensome, complex, and both lacks clarity and creates a de facto strict liability standard. The Commission is of the view that other existing requirements of the Advisers Act and its associated rules, including prohibitions on fraud, fiduciary duty requirements, the compliance rule, and the code of ethics rule (defined below), are likely sufficient to address pay-to-play practices while allowing an adviser the flexibility to implement an approach that is more appropriately tailored to its particular risks, rendering the political contribution rule unnecessary. The Commission also is proposing to amend the rule under the Advisers Act pertaining to books and records consistent with the proposed rescission.
2026-18190, Transfer Agent Rules
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC" or "Commission") is proposing to adopt new rules, amend existing rules, amend the existing form for registration with the Commission as a transfer agent (Form TA-1) and the existing form for reporting activities of transfer agents (Form TA-2), and rescind an existing rule governing registered transfer agents. The proposals are designed to modernize the rules governing registered transfer agents.
2026-17183, Regulation Crypto Assets
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") is proposing new rules to create a tailored offering regime for certain investment contracts involving crypto assets. The proposed offering regime is intended to facilitate capital formation and accommodate innovation within the crypto asset markets while, at the same time, ensuring that investors are adequately protected and provided with the information they need to make informed investment decisions. The proposed rules would be set forth in a new regulation titled "Regulation Crypto Assets" and would include two exemptions from the registration requirements of section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933. The first exemption would permit offerings of up to $5 million during a four-year period. The second exemption would permit offerings of up to $75 million during each 12-month period. Under both exemptions, issuers would be required to make certain principles-based narrative disclosures available to their investors. In addition, issuers under the second exemption would be required to provide financial statements and would be subject to ongoing reporting requirements. Issuers that rely on these exemptions would remain subject to the antifraud and antimanipulation provisions of the Federal securities laws. The proposed rules also would include a conditional safe harbor from the term "investment contract" in the definitions of "security" in the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If the conditions of that proposed safe harbor are satisfied, then a crypto asset would be deemed not to be subject to an investment contract for purposes of those definitions of "security."
2026-12163, The Trade-Through Rule and Locked and Crossed Markets Provisions of Regulation NMS
The SEC wants to scrap some old rules that stop stocks from being traded at worse prices and prevent confusing market quotes. This change affects stock traders and exchanges, aiming to simplify trading and possibly speed things up. If you want to share your thoughts, you’ve got until August 17, 2026, so don’t miss out!
Previous / Next Documents
Previous: 2026-11085, Airworthiness Directives; General Electric Company Engines
The FAA wants to fix a fuel leak problem in certain General Electric GEnx engines by making airlines replace the main fuel pump with a safer part. This affects many big airplane engines and aims to keep flights safe and smooth. Comments on this plan are open until July 20, 2026, and swapping parts might cost some money but prevents bigger issues down the runway.
Next: 2026-11093, Amending the Medical Evaluation Requirements in the Respiratory Protection Standard for Certain Types of Respirators
OSHA wants to make it easier for workers using certain respirators by removing some medical check-ups for filtering facepiece and loose-fitting powered air-purifying respirators. This change affects workers who wear these masks and could save time and money on medical evaluations. The public can share their thoughts until July 6, 2026, before the rule is finalized.