SEC Grants Narrow Relief to Treasury Clearing Agencies
Published Date: 6/23/2026
Notice
Summary
The SEC is giving special permission to some U.S. Treasury securities clearing agencies to exclude certain trades between related parties from strict rules about reporting and clearing. This change affects big financial players who trade these securities and helps them avoid extra paperwork for these specific deals. The new rules kick in soon and aim to keep the market smooth without adding extra costs or risks.
Analyzed Economic Effects
3 provisions identified: 3 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.
Exemption for Private Fund–Captive Repo Trades
The SEC exempts repurchase (repo) and reverse repo transactions between a Private Fund and its Captive Clearing Subsidiary (a direct participant) from the Rule 17ad-22(a) definition of an “eligible secondary market transaction,” if three conditions are met: (1) the Captive Clearing Sub is directly or indirectly wholly owned by one or more Private Funds; (2) if owned by more than one Private Fund, those funds are managed by a common investment adviser or affiliated group; and (3) the Private Funds and Captive Clearing Sub satisfy the majority ownership, accounting consolidation, and outward-facing conditions (to the extent the outward-facing condition applies). The Order is dated June 18, 2026.
Keeps Private Funds’ Direct Clearing Access Option
The exemption lets Private Funds access central clearing through a Captive Clearing Sub instead of relying on an unaffiliated third-party direct participant. The Commission states this could permit more transactions to be centrally cleared, potentially increasing overall clearing capacity and promoting prompt and accurate clearance and settlement.
Private Funds Continue Funding Their Own Margin
The Commission notes that using Captive Clearing Subs generally means Private Funds would use their own capital to fund margin requirements to the U.S. Treasury securities clearing agency, rather than relying on unaffiliated third-party direct participants. The Order says this could free up capital for unaffiliated direct participants to sponsor other, smaller market participants into central clearing.
Personalized for You
How does this regulation affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this federal register document means for your household, plus every other regulation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Key Dates
Department and Agencies
Related Federal Register Documents
2026-19260, Rescission of Rule 14a-8's Federal Regulation of Shareholder Proposals and Amendments to Rule 14a-4
The SEC wants to stop its federal rule that controls how shareholders can make proposals at company meetings, letting state laws and company rules take over instead. They’re also changing rules so companies can sometimes vote on proposals not in their official materials—but shareholders can opt out if they want. This affects investors and companies, with comments open until November 20, 2026, and could shake up how shareholder voices are heard and counted.
2026-18424, Political Contributions by Certain Investment Advisers
The Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission" or the "SEC") is proposing to rescind the political contribution rule under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the "Advisers Act"), which prohibits investment advisers from providing investment advisory services for compensation to a government client for two years after an adviser or any covered associate of the adviser makes a contribution to certain categories of elected officials or candidates, among other prohibitions. In the more than fifteen years since the rule was adopted, implementation challenges associated with the political contribution rule have resulted in a range of significant unintended consequences, including compliance practices among some investment advisers that may have had the effect of restricting all political contributions by the investment advisers and their employees. Market participants also have stated that the political contribution rule is burdensome, complex, and both lacks clarity and creates a de facto strict liability standard. The Commission is of the view that other existing requirements of the Advisers Act and its associated rules, including prohibitions on fraud, fiduciary duty requirements, the compliance rule, and the code of ethics rule (defined below), are likely sufficient to address pay-to-play practices while allowing an adviser the flexibility to implement an approach that is more appropriately tailored to its particular risks, rendering the political contribution rule unnecessary. The Commission also is proposing to amend the rule under the Advisers Act pertaining to books and records consistent with the proposed rescission.
2026-18190, Transfer Agent Rules
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC" or "Commission") is proposing to adopt new rules, amend existing rules, amend the existing form for registration with the Commission as a transfer agent (Form TA-1) and the existing form for reporting activities of transfer agents (Form TA-2), and rescind an existing rule governing registered transfer agents. The proposals are designed to modernize the rules governing registered transfer agents.
2026-17183, Regulation Crypto Assets
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") is proposing new rules to create a tailored offering regime for certain investment contracts involving crypto assets. The proposed offering regime is intended to facilitate capital formation and accommodate innovation within the crypto asset markets while, at the same time, ensuring that investors are adequately protected and provided with the information they need to make informed investment decisions. The proposed rules would be set forth in a new regulation titled "Regulation Crypto Assets" and would include two exemptions from the registration requirements of section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933. The first exemption would permit offerings of up to $5 million during a four-year period. The second exemption would permit offerings of up to $75 million during each 12-month period. Under both exemptions, issuers would be required to make certain principles-based narrative disclosures available to their investors. In addition, issuers under the second exemption would be required to provide financial statements and would be subject to ongoing reporting requirements. Issuers that rely on these exemptions would remain subject to the antifraud and antimanipulation provisions of the Federal securities laws. The proposed rules also would include a conditional safe harbor from the term "investment contract" in the definitions of "security" in the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If the conditions of that proposed safe harbor are satisfied, then a crypto asset would be deemed not to be subject to an investment contract for purposes of those definitions of "security."
2026-12163, The Trade-Through Rule and Locked and Crossed Markets Provisions of Regulation NMS
The SEC wants to scrap some old rules that stop stocks from being traded at worse prices and prevent confusing market quotes. This change affects stock traders and exchanges, aiming to simplify trading and possibly speed things up. If you want to share your thoughts, you’ve got until August 17, 2026, so don’t miss out!
2026-10373, Registered Offering Reform
The SEC wants to make it easier and cheaper for more companies to sell their stocks and bonds to the public. They’re opening up special forms and benefits to more businesses, updating rules to be more modern, and cutting red tape by overriding some state rules. If you’re a company planning to raise money, these changes could speed things up and save you money, with feedback due by July 27, 2026.
Previous / Next Documents
Previous: 2026-12612, Aurobindo and Lannett; Analysis of Proposed Agreement Containing Consent Orders To Aid Public Comment
The Federal Trade Commission is asking for your thoughts on a deal with Aurobindo and Lannett, two drug companies accused of unfair competition. The companies agree to stop certain practices that hurt competition, helping keep medicine prices fair. You have until July 23, 2026, to share your opinion before the deal is final.
Next: 2026-12614, Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings
The Center for Scientific Review is holding several closed virtual meetings on July 16, 2026, to review and evaluate important grant applications. These meetings protect private info and trade secrets while deciding which research projects get funding. Scientists applying for grants and the public can expect no changes in timing or money, just careful, confidential reviews.