SEC Wants Companies to Email Investors by Default
Published Date: 7/21/2026
Proposed Rule
Summary
The SEC wants to make it easier for companies to send important financial info electronically without asking for permission first. This change affects companies, investors, and shareholders by speeding up how info is shared and cutting paper costs. Comments on this new rule are open until September 21, 2026, so get ready to weigh in!
Analyzed Economic Effects
5 provisions identified: 5 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.
Projected fund and shareholder savings estimate
Industry submissions cited in the proposal estimate that default e-delivery for funds could save funds and their shareholders between $589 million and $797 million per year and $3 billion to $4 billion cumulatively over five years. The SEC cites these industry-provided savings figures in the proposal.
Electronic delivery becomes the default
The SEC is proposing Regulation E-Delivery to let covered entities deliver required securities disclosures and reports electronically by default without first getting affirmative consent. The proposal was published July 21, 2026, and comments are due September 21, 2026.
Free paper copies and opt-out must be available
Under the proposal, recipients may opt out of electronic delivery and request paper copies of covered information promptly and free of charge. The rule would require covered entities to permit updating electronic addresses and to provide paper on request.
Tighter rules for personal financial information
The proposal distinguishes covered information that includes personal financial information (PFI) and imposes conditions for e-delivering information that contains PFI to protect that data. The rule text explicitly addresses delivery of covered information that includes PFI.
Rescinding Rule 30e-3 and amending proxy rules
The SEC proposes to rescind Investment Company Act Rule 30e-3 and to amend proxy and tender-offer dissemination rules (Regulations 14A and 14C and Rule 14d-5) to align with the new e-delivery framework. These changes are intended to facilitate and promote consistency with Regulation E-Delivery.
Personalized for You
How does this regulation affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this federal register document means for your household, plus every other regulation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Key Dates
Department and Agencies
Related Federal Register Documents
2026-18424, Political Contributions by Certain Investment Advisers
The Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission" or the "SEC") is proposing to rescind the political contribution rule under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the "Advisers Act"), which prohibits investment advisers from providing investment advisory services for compensation to a government client for two years after an adviser or any covered associate of the adviser makes a contribution to certain categories of elected officials or candidates, among other prohibitions. In the more than fifteen years since the rule was adopted, implementation challenges associated with the political contribution rule have resulted in a range of significant unintended consequences, including compliance practices among some investment advisers that may have had the effect of restricting all political contributions by the investment advisers and their employees. Market participants also have stated that the political contribution rule is burdensome, complex, and both lacks clarity and creates a de facto strict liability standard. The Commission is of the view that other existing requirements of the Advisers Act and its associated rules, including prohibitions on fraud, fiduciary duty requirements, the compliance rule, and the code of ethics rule (defined below), are likely sufficient to address pay-to-play practices while allowing an adviser the flexibility to implement an approach that is more appropriately tailored to its particular risks, rendering the political contribution rule unnecessary. The Commission also is proposing to amend the rule under the Advisers Act pertaining to books and records consistent with the proposed rescission.
2026-18190, Transfer Agent Rules
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC" or "Commission") is proposing to adopt new rules, amend existing rules, amend the existing form for registration with the Commission as a transfer agent (Form TA-1) and the existing form for reporting activities of transfer agents (Form TA-2), and rescind an existing rule governing registered transfer agents. The proposals are designed to modernize the rules governing registered transfer agents.
2026-17183, Regulation Crypto Assets
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") is proposing new rules to create a tailored offering regime for certain investment contracts involving crypto assets. The proposed offering regime is intended to facilitate capital formation and accommodate innovation within the crypto asset markets while, at the same time, ensuring that investors are adequately protected and provided with the information they need to make informed investment decisions. The proposed rules would be set forth in a new regulation titled "Regulation Crypto Assets" and would include two exemptions from the registration requirements of section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933. The first exemption would permit offerings of up to $5 million during a four-year period. The second exemption would permit offerings of up to $75 million during each 12-month period. Under both exemptions, issuers would be required to make certain principles-based narrative disclosures available to their investors. In addition, issuers under the second exemption would be required to provide financial statements and would be subject to ongoing reporting requirements. Issuers that rely on these exemptions would remain subject to the antifraud and antimanipulation provisions of the Federal securities laws. The proposed rules also would include a conditional safe harbor from the term "investment contract" in the definitions of "security" in the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If the conditions of that proposed safe harbor are satisfied, then a crypto asset would be deemed not to be subject to an investment contract for purposes of those definitions of "security."
2026-12163, The Trade-Through Rule and Locked and Crossed Markets Provisions of Regulation NMS
The SEC wants to scrap some old rules that stop stocks from being traded at worse prices and prevent confusing market quotes. This change affects stock traders and exchanges, aiming to simplify trading and possibly speed things up. If you want to share your thoughts, you’ve got until August 17, 2026, so don’t miss out!
2026-10373, Registered Offering Reform
The SEC wants to make it easier and cheaper for more companies to sell their stocks and bonds to the public. They’re opening up special forms and benefits to more businesses, updating rules to be more modern, and cutting red tape by overriding some state rules. If you’re a company planning to raise money, these changes could speed things up and save you money, with feedback due by July 27, 2026.
2026-10222, Enhancement of Emerging Growth Company Accommodations and Simplification of Filer Status for Reporting Companies
The SEC is making it easier for companies that report their finances by simplifying their categories into just two groups: big and small filers. Smaller companies, including emerging growth ones, will get more time to file reports and enjoy simpler rules, while big companies keep stricter standards. These changes aim to save time and money, with feedback open until July 20, 2026.
Previous / Next Documents
Previous: 2026-14668, Establishment of Class E Airspace; Mountain Home, TX: Withdrawal
The FAA is hitting pause on plans to create new Class E airspace around Rancho Paraiso Airport in Mountain Home, TX, because fresh data needs a closer look. Pilots and local flyers won’t see changes just yet, but stay tuned—new rules could pop up after the FAA finishes its review. No costs or deadlines are changing right now, so it’s a wait-and-watch moment for everyone involved.
Next: 2026-14694, Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; Fisheries Off West Coast States; Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery; Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Management Plan; Amendment 38; 2027-28 Biennial Specifications and Management Measures
The Pacific Fishery Management Council wants to update fishing rules for West Coast groundfish in 2027-28 because two fish species, yelloweye rockfish and California quillback rockfish, have recovered. This means their rebuilding plans will be removed, allowing more flexible fishing. Fishermen, communities, and fish lovers should weigh in by September 19, 2026, to help shape these changes that could impact fishing limits and local economies.