Stock Exchange Fine-Tunes Bid-Ask Spreads for Market Makers
Published Date: 9/1/2026
Notice
Summary
Cboe BZX Exchange is updating its rules to set clear limits on how far apart market makers can set their buy (bid) and sell (ask) prices. This change helps keep trading fair and orderly for everyone involved, especially market makers and traders. The new rule kicks in right away, aiming to boost market quality without extra costs.
Analyzed Economic Effects
5 provisions identified: 3 benefits, 2 costs, 0 mixed.
Market Makers limited to $5 quote width
The Exchange proposes that a Market Maker's two-sided electronic quote may not be wider than $5 between bid and offer. The $5 maximum is measured across the Market Maker firm (aggregating all EFIDs) and applies to quoted series or classes unless the Exchange sets a different differential.
Exchange can set series-specific spread limits
The Exchange may establish bid/ask differentials other than the $5 general maximum for one or more option series or classes and will announce any such differentials via Exchange Notice. The filing notes other exchanges have set series-specific differentials (for example, Phlx had intraday differentials ranging from $20 to $800 for NDX options in a cited alert).
Firm-level aggregation of Market Maker quotes
The Exchange will measure a Market Maker's compliance with the bid/ask differential at the Options Member firm level by aggregating quotes across all Executing Firm IDs (EFIDs). For example, if EFID A quotes $0 bid / $10 offer and EFID B quotes $5 bid / $15 offer, the firm aggregate is $5 bid / $10 offer, which meets a $5 differential requirement.
No-bid treated as $0 for width calculation
The Exchange clarifies that a bid of zero or no bid is treated as a $0 bid for calculating the bid/ask differential. Using the example from the filing, a lone $10 offer with no bid is a $10 width unless aggregated with other EFID quotes at the firm level.
Wider option spreads when underlying NBBO is wide
The proposed rule exempts in-the-money option series from the $5 differential when the national best bid and offer (NBBO) for the underlying security is wider than the applicable differential; in such cases the option spread may be as wide as the underlying NBBO. The Exchange says this avoids requiring options to be quoted tighter than the underlying security.
Personalized for You
How does this regulation affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this federal register document means for your household, plus every other regulation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Key Dates
Department and Agencies
Related Federal Register Documents
2026-20466, Adviser and Regulated Fund Custody Rules; Crypto Custody Rules
The SEC is updating rules for how investment advisers and funds handle crypto assets, making sure they keep these digital investments safe and properly reported. These changes affect advisers, funds, and anyone managing crypto securities, aiming to modernize rules and improve transparency. Comments on the proposal are open until December 7, 2026, so get ready to weigh in!
2026-19260, Rescission of Rule 14a-8's Federal Regulation of Shareholder Proposals and Amendments to Rule 14a-4
The SEC wants to stop its federal rule that controls how shareholders can make proposals at company meetings, letting state laws and company rules take over instead. They’re also changing rules so companies can sometimes vote on proposals not in their official materials—but shareholders can opt out if they want. This affects investors and companies, with comments open until November 20, 2026, and could shake up how shareholder voices are heard and counted.
2026-18424, Political Contributions by Certain Investment Advisers
The Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission" or the "SEC") is proposing to rescind the political contribution rule under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the "Advisers Act"), which prohibits investment advisers from providing investment advisory services for compensation to a government client for two years after an adviser or any covered associate of the adviser makes a contribution to certain categories of elected officials or candidates, among other prohibitions. In the more than fifteen years since the rule was adopted, implementation challenges associated with the political contribution rule have resulted in a range of significant unintended consequences, including compliance practices among some investment advisers that may have had the effect of restricting all political contributions by the investment advisers and their employees. Market participants also have stated that the political contribution rule is burdensome, complex, and both lacks clarity and creates a de facto strict liability standard. The Commission is of the view that other existing requirements of the Advisers Act and its associated rules, including prohibitions on fraud, fiduciary duty requirements, the compliance rule, and the code of ethics rule (defined below), are likely sufficient to address pay-to-play practices while allowing an adviser the flexibility to implement an approach that is more appropriately tailored to its particular risks, rendering the political contribution rule unnecessary. The Commission also is proposing to amend the rule under the Advisers Act pertaining to books and records consistent with the proposed rescission.
2026-18190, Transfer Agent Rules
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC" or "Commission") is proposing to adopt new rules, amend existing rules, amend the existing form for registration with the Commission as a transfer agent (Form TA-1) and the existing form for reporting activities of transfer agents (Form TA-2), and rescind an existing rule governing registered transfer agents. The proposals are designed to modernize the rules governing registered transfer agents.
2026-17183, Regulation Crypto Assets
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") is proposing new rules to create a tailored offering regime for certain investment contracts involving crypto assets. The proposed offering regime is intended to facilitate capital formation and accommodate innovation within the crypto asset markets while, at the same time, ensuring that investors are adequately protected and provided with the information they need to make informed investment decisions. The proposed rules would be set forth in a new regulation titled "Regulation Crypto Assets" and would include two exemptions from the registration requirements of section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933. The first exemption would permit offerings of up to $5 million during a four-year period. The second exemption would permit offerings of up to $75 million during each 12-month period. Under both exemptions, issuers would be required to make certain principles-based narrative disclosures available to their investors. In addition, issuers under the second exemption would be required to provide financial statements and would be subject to ongoing reporting requirements. Issuers that rely on these exemptions would remain subject to the antifraud and antimanipulation provisions of the Federal securities laws. The proposed rules also would include a conditional safe harbor from the term "investment contract" in the definitions of "security" in the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If the conditions of that proposed safe harbor are satisfied, then a crypto asset would be deemed not to be subject to an investment contract for purposes of those definitions of "security."
2026-12163, The Trade-Through Rule and Locked and Crossed Markets Provisions of Regulation NMS
The SEC wants to scrap some old rules that stop stocks from being traded at worse prices and prevent confusing market quotes. This change affects stock traders and exchanges, aiming to simplify trading and possibly speed things up. If you want to share your thoughts, you’ve got until August 17, 2026, so don’t miss out!
Previous / Next Documents
Previous: 2026-17802, Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Exchange Rule 22.6 (Market Maker Quotations) To Adopt Two-Sided Quote Bid/Ask Differentials
Cboe EDGX Exchange is updating its rules to set clear limits on how wide market makers can set their bid and ask prices. This change helps keep trading fair and orderly for everyone involved, especially market makers and traders. The new rule kicks in right away, aiming to improve market quality without extra costs.
Next: 2026-17804, Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Exchange Rule 5.52 (Market-Maker Quotes) To Adopt Two-Sided Quote Bid/Ask Differentials
Cboe C2 Exchange is updating its rules to set clear limits on how wide market-makers can set their bid and ask prices. This change affects market-makers by helping keep prices fair and competitive, starting immediately. It’s a smart move to make trading smoother and more transparent, with no extra costs for traders.