Crypto ETF Gets a New Route onto the Exchange
Published Date: 11/3/2026
Notice
Summary
NYSE Arca is switching how the Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF shares are listed and traded, moving from a special rule to a more general one. This change starts right away and could make trading smoother for investors. If you’re into crypto ETFs, this update affects how you buy and sell these shares on the exchange.
Analyzed Economic Effects
3 provisions identified: 3 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.
Bitwise 10 ETF moved to generic listing
The NYSE Arca is changing how the Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF is listed and traded. Effective with the Exchange's October 21, 2026 filing, the Fund will be listed and traded under NYSE Arca Rule 8.201-E (Generic) instead of Rule 8.500-E, and the Exchange says this will facilitate the listing and trading of the Shares.
Up to 15% NAV may be certain digital assets
The amended Rule 8.201-E allows up to 15% of a trust's net asset value (NAV) to consist of digital commodities or securities that do not independently meet the core generic eligibility criteria. The filing says the Fund will meet Rule 8.201-E's requirements on an initial and continued listing basis.
Definition of 'digital commodity' and active trust shares
Rule 8.201-E, as amended, adds a defined term ‘‘digital commodity’’ (a digital asset that derives value from the programmatic operation of a crypto system and supply/demand dynamics) and permits actively managed Commodity-Based Trust Shares. These explicit changes in the rule text apply to how certain crypto-linked trust shares are described and may be used by funds listing under the rule.
Personalized for You
How does this regulation affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this federal register document means for your household, plus every other regulation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Key Dates
Department and Agencies
Related Federal Register Documents
2026-21037, Investment Company Cross Trading
The SEC wants to update the rules for cross trading, which is when investment companies trade securities with their affiliates. They’re making more types of securities eligible, tightening rules to protect investors, and requiring better reporting of these trades. If you’re involved in investment companies, watch out for these changes and get your comments in by December 14, 2026!
2026-20466, Adviser and Regulated Fund Custody Rules; Crypto Custody Rules
The SEC is updating rules for how investment advisers and funds handle crypto assets, making sure they keep these digital investments safe and properly reported. These changes affect advisers, funds, and anyone managing crypto securities, aiming to modernize rules and improve transparency. Comments on the proposal are open until December 7, 2026, so get ready to weigh in!
2026-19260, Rescission of Rule 14a-8's Federal Regulation of Shareholder Proposals and Amendments to Rule 14a-4
The SEC wants to stop its federal rule that controls how shareholders can make proposals at company meetings, letting state laws and company rules take over instead. They’re also changing rules so companies can sometimes vote on proposals not in their official materials—but shareholders can opt out if they want. This affects investors and companies, with comments open until November 20, 2026, and could shake up how shareholder voices are heard and counted.
2026-18424, Political Contributions by Certain Investment Advisers
The Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission" or the "SEC") is proposing to rescind the political contribution rule under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the "Advisers Act"), which prohibits investment advisers from providing investment advisory services for compensation to a government client for two years after an adviser or any covered associate of the adviser makes a contribution to certain categories of elected officials or candidates, among other prohibitions. In the more than fifteen years since the rule was adopted, implementation challenges associated with the political contribution rule have resulted in a range of significant unintended consequences, including compliance practices among some investment advisers that may have had the effect of restricting all political contributions by the investment advisers and their employees. Market participants also have stated that the political contribution rule is burdensome, complex, and both lacks clarity and creates a de facto strict liability standard. The Commission is of the view that other existing requirements of the Advisers Act and its associated rules, including prohibitions on fraud, fiduciary duty requirements, the compliance rule, and the code of ethics rule (defined below), are likely sufficient to address pay-to-play practices while allowing an adviser the flexibility to implement an approach that is more appropriately tailored to its particular risks, rendering the political contribution rule unnecessary. The Commission also is proposing to amend the rule under the Advisers Act pertaining to books and records consistent with the proposed rescission.
2026-18190, Transfer Agent Rules
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC" or "Commission") is proposing to adopt new rules, amend existing rules, amend the existing form for registration with the Commission as a transfer agent (Form TA-1) and the existing form for reporting activities of transfer agents (Form TA-2), and rescind an existing rule governing registered transfer agents. The proposals are designed to modernize the rules governing registered transfer agents.
2026-17183, Regulation Crypto Assets
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") is proposing new rules to create a tailored offering regime for certain investment contracts involving crypto assets. The proposed offering regime is intended to facilitate capital formation and accommodate innovation within the crypto asset markets while, at the same time, ensuring that investors are adequately protected and provided with the information they need to make informed investment decisions. The proposed rules would be set forth in a new regulation titled "Regulation Crypto Assets" and would include two exemptions from the registration requirements of section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933. The first exemption would permit offerings of up to $5 million during a four-year period. The second exemption would permit offerings of up to $75 million during each 12-month period. Under both exemptions, issuers would be required to make certain principles-based narrative disclosures available to their investors. In addition, issuers under the second exemption would be required to provide financial statements and would be subject to ongoing reporting requirements. Issuers that rely on these exemptions would remain subject to the antifraud and antimanipulation provisions of the Federal securities laws. The proposed rules also would include a conditional safe harbor from the term "investment contract" in the definitions of "security" in the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If the conditions of that proposed safe harbor are satisfied, then a crypto asset would be deemed not to be subject to an investment contract for purposes of those definitions of "security."
Previous / Next Documents
Previous: 2026-22372, Certain Extrusion-Coated Magnet Wire; Notice of Institution of Investigation
Essex Solutions from Atlanta has asked the U.S. International Trade Commission to investigate certain imported extrusion-coated magnet wires that might be breaking their patents. If the investigation finds problems, it could lead to stopping these products from being sold in the U.S., protecting American businesses. This process started on October 29, 2026, and could impact companies importing or selling these wires soon.
Next: 2026-22375, Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Exchange Rule 2(c)
The New York Stock Exchange fixed a small but important mistake in one of its rules by putting back some missing words in the definition of 'associated person.' This change affects members and firms on the Exchange and takes effect immediately, with no extra costs involved. It’s a quick technical update to keep things clear and running smoothly.