HR2683119th Congress

Remote Access Security Act

Sponsored By: Representative Lawler, Michael [R-NY-17]

Passed House

Summary

This bill would expand U.S. export controls to cover remote access to controlled items. It defines remote access over networks, including the Internet and cloud services, and treats that access the same as physical exports when it risks national security or foreign policy.

Show full summary
  • Foreign persons who access items under U.S. jurisdiction from abroad would be subject to export licensing rules and existing criminal penalties, with current criminal intent standards preserved.
  • U.S. companies that provide or enable networked access, such as cloud or software providers, would face the same licensing, compliance, and enforcement obligations now applied to physical transfers.
  • The Commerce Secretary would have to brief the House Foreign Affairs Committee and the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee about proposed remote-access controls, the security risk addressed, how rules respond, and possible economic impacts.

Personalized for You

How does this bill affect your finances?

Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Bill Overview

Analyzed Economic Effects

2 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 0 costs, 1 mixed.

Export-style rules for remote access

This bill would treat remote access to controlled items like an export or in‑country transfer. A foreign person using a network from another location would count as "remote access" if the Commerce Secretary finds a serious national security or foreign policy risk. The bill would not lower the criminal intent standard for prosecutions. The Secretary would be able to issue rules and require licenses for remote access, and those who provide access would face the same enforcement and penalties as exporters. Exporters, cloud, and network providers would need to follow these rules.

Commerce to brief Congress on remote-access rules

The Commerce Secretary would have to keep two committees informed about planned rules on remote access. Briefings would explain the security risk, how the rules would address it, and likely economic effects. Briefings could be classified when needed. Committees would not have a veto over the rules.

Sponsors & CoSponsors

Sponsor

Lawler, Michael [R-NY-17]

NY • R

Cosponsors

  • Crockett

    TX • D

    Sponsored 4/7/2025

  • Rep. McCormick, Richard [R-GA-7]

    GA • R

    Sponsored 4/7/2025

  • Rep. Kamlager-Dove, Sydney [D-CA-37]

    CA • D

    Sponsored 4/7/2025

  • Rep. Moolenaar, John R. [R-MI-2]

    MI • R

    Sponsored 4/7/2025

  • Rep. Huizenga, Bill [R-MI-4]

    MI • R

    Sponsored 4/7/2025

  • Rep. Sherman, Brad [D-CA-32]

    CA • D

    Sponsored 4/8/2025

  • Rep. Krishnamoorthi, Raja [D-IL-8]

    IL • D

    Sponsored 4/8/2025

  • Jackson (IL)

    IL • D

    Sponsored 4/8/2025

  • Rep. Tenney, Claudia [R-NY-24]

    NY • R

    Sponsored 4/8/2025

  • Rep. Kim, Young [R-CA-40]

    CA • R

    Sponsored 4/8/2025

  • Rep. Baumgartner, Michael [R-WA-5]

    WA • R

    Sponsored 4/29/2025

  • McBride

    DE • D

    Sponsored 5/8/2025

  • Rep. Fitzpatrick, Brian K. [R-PA-1]

    PA • R

    Sponsored 6/4/2025

  • Rep. Amo, Gabe [D-RI-1]

    RI • D

    Sponsored 7/15/2025

  • Rep. Vindman, Eugene Simon [D-VA-7]

    VA • D

    Sponsored 9/10/2025

  • Rep. Lee, Susie [D-NV-3]

    NV • D

    Sponsored 9/30/2025

  • Rep. Self, Keith [R-TX-3]

    TX • R

    Sponsored 10/8/2025

Roll Call Votes

All Roll Calls

Yes: 369 • No: 22

house vote • 1/12/2026

On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended

Yes: 369 • No: 22

View on Congress.gov
Back to Legislation