Full-Body Restraint Prohibition Act
Sponsored By: Representative Ramirez, Delia C. [D-IL-3]
Introduced
Summary
Bans DHS from buying or using four‑point and five‑point full‑body restraints. It would create a new statutory prohibition in the Homeland Security Act, enforce the ban through employee discipline, and require regular reports to Congress.
Show full summary
- People held by DHS: Stops future use and acquisition of full‑body restraints by Department personnel. Contracts or agreements signed on or before enactment would remain valid.
- DHS employees: Officers or staff who violate the prohibition or deceive leadership or Congress would be removed from Federal service under DHS discipline rules.
- Vendors and contractors: Federal funds could not be used to buy new full‑body restraints for DHS, which limits future procurement.
- Congressional oversight: The Secretary must report compliance not later than 90 days after enactment and then quarterly, including detailed data on any restraint events and the personnel involved.
Your PRIA Score
Personalized for You
How does this bill affect your finances?
Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
1 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 0 costs, 1 mixed.
DHS ban on full-body restraints
If enacted, the bill would prohibit the Department of Homeland Security from buying or using full-body restraints. It would define full-body restraints as four-point and five-point restraints that immobilize a person. The ban on buying would not apply to contracts made on or before the date of enactment. The Secretary would need to report to the House and Senate Homeland Security and Judiciary committees within 90 days after enactment and then every quarter about compliance and any restraints DHS holds. If DHS used a restraint, the report would, to the extent practicable, list detailed incident information such as the person and officer identities, field office, reason for use, age, sex, race, ethnicity, duration, citizenship or immigration status, injuries, Department component, location or transport route, available language services, and whether a health professional was involved and their qualifications. The bill would also require the Secretary to remove any DHS officer or employee who violates the ban or who deceives Congress or departmental leaders, using DHS discipline and adverse action programs.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Ramirez, Delia C. [D-IL-3]
IL • D
Cosponsors
Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]
DC • D
Sponsored 2/25/2026
Rep. Tlaib, Rashida [D-MI-12]
MI • D
Sponsored 2/25/2026
Rep. Goldman, Daniel S. [D-NY-10]
NY • D
Sponsored 2/25/2026
Simon
CA • D
Sponsored 2/25/2026
Johnson (GA)
GA • D
Sponsored 2/25/2026
Espaillat
NY • D
Sponsored 2/25/2026
Davis (IL)
IL • D
Sponsored 2/25/2026
Rep. Lee, Summer L. [D-PA-12]
PA • D
Sponsored 2/25/2026
Lofgren
CA • D
Sponsored 2/25/2026
Rep. Velázquez, Nydia M. [D-NY-7]
NY • D
Sponsored 2/25/2026
Randall
WA • D
Sponsored 2/25/2026
Rep. Evans, Dwight [D-PA-3]
PA • D
Sponsored 3/4/2026
Rep. Frost, Maxwell [D-FL-10]
FL • D
Sponsored 3/9/2026
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.gov