Engineering Biology Readiness Act
Sponsored By: Senator Kaine, Tim [D-VA]
Introduced
Summary
Engineering biology risks would become a formal focus of U.S. biodefense planning. This bill would require the biennial national biodefense threat assessment to include a detailed analysis and recommendations on engineering biology and would extend an annual briefing deadline to a date five years after enactment of the FY2027 National Defense Authorization Act.
Show full summary
- Federal departments and agencies would have to add engineering biology analysis and policy recommendations to the biennial threat update. They must evaluate research lines, authorities, gaps, redundancies, and propose legislative actions and funding estimates.
- Industry, academia, and civil society would be consulted on those recommendations, including researchers who have not received Federal grants in the past five years. Agencies are directed to propose programs or modernize existing ones to set safeguards, share best practices, and offer consultation on biosafety and biosecurity.
- Congress would receive unclassified findings with an optional classified annex and specific funding estimates tied to proposed legislative fixes. The changes aim to modernize biosafety, biosecurity, and biodefense planning to reduce the risk of misuse or accidental release.
Your PRIA Score
Personalized for You
How does this bill affect your finances?
Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
1 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.
Federal review of engineering biology risks
This bill would require certain federal departments and agencies to add engineering biology analysis and recommendations to the next biennial biodefense threat assessment provided after enactment. The analysis would assess threats to national security and public safety from current and anticipated engineering biology risks. It would describe current lines of research and development across covered departments and agencies for prevention, deterrence, preparedness, detection, response, attribution, recovery, and mitigation. The agencies would analyze authorities, regulations, and programs (including biosafety, biosecurity, and biodefense), evaluate gaps, redundancies, and ambiguities, and may include other relevant matters. Recommendations would address aligning research across agencies, modernizing authorities and programs, and creating or updating program(s) to enforce safeguards, identify best practices, issue voluntary guidance, and provide consultation. For certain recommendations, agencies would have to propose specific legislative actions and estimate the funding needed. Agencies would develop the analysis and recommendations in consultation with industry, academia, and civil society, including life‑science researchers who have not received a federal grant or contract in the prior five years. The report would be submitted in unclassified form but may include a classified annex. Covered departments and agencies, and the definitions of "engineering biology" and "engineering biology risk," would be set by cross-reference to existing statutes.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Kaine, Tim [D-VA]
VA • D
Cosponsors
Sen. Budd, Ted [R-NC]
NC • R
Sponsored 4/21/2026
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.gov