All Roll Calls
Yes: 102 • No: 95
Sponsored By: Senator Graham, Lindsey [R-SC]
Passed Senate
Sets a binding 10-year federal budget framework for 2025–2034 with year-by-year ceilings on revenues, outlays, deficits, and debt and detailed, category-by-category funding levels. It also creates enforcement mechanics, reconciliation targets, and reserve funds to shape how Congress meets those ceilings.
Personalized for You
Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
8 provisions identified: 3 benefits, 0 costs, 5 mixed.
If adopted by both chambers, the Senate would use fixed yearly Social Security revenue, outlay, and admin tallies for 2025–2034 to enforce budget rules. Example for 2025: revenues about $1.304 trillion, outlays about $1.414 trillion, and SSA admin new budget authority about $6.408 billion. These numbers would guide Senate enforcement so benefit checks and operations planning use the same baselines.
If adopted by both chambers, the Senate would use set yearly amounts for USPS administrative new budget authority and outlays in 2025–2034 to enforce budget rules. Example: about $268 million in 2025 and about $364 million in 2034. These amounts would be used as constraints for Senate enforcement.
If adopted by both chambers, Congress would create a reserve fund to protect Medicaid and extend Medicare Part A’s trust fund. The Senate Budget chair could adjust budget limits to fit bills that do this. Any bill must not increase the deficit for 2025–2034.
If adopted by both chambers, certain House and Senate committees would have to propose budget changes for 2025–2034 by March 7, 2025. The Senate Budget Committee would package Senate recommendations into a reconciliation bill without substantive changes. Budget Committee chairs could adjust allocations to fit compliant reconciliation bills.
If adopted by both chambers, both chambers would include Social Security Administration and U.S. Postal Service administrative costs in budget allocations and enforcement for 2025–2034. This would make SSA and USPS admin funding part of the baseline used to judge spending bills.
If adopted by both chambers, Congress would set yearly totals for revenues, outlays, deficits, and debt for 2025–2034. Example for 2025: revenues about $3.853 trillion and a deficit about $782.9 billion. It would also set dollar levels by major category (like Health, Medicare, Social Security, Education, and Defense) to guide committee allocations.
If adopted by both chambers, Budget chairs could revise budget limits to fit bills that do not raise the deficit for 2025–2034. The Senate chair could also do this for deregulatory bills that lower new spending from federal rules and do not raise the deficit for 2025–2029 or 2025–2034.
If adopted by both chambers, Budget chairs could adjust totals and allocations to match new budget concepts, CBO baseline updates, or new laws that revise discretionary caps. Adjustments would apply during consideration and take effect upon enactment, and must be published in the Congressional Record. Chairs must also publish committee allocations for FY2025 and 2025–2034 for enforcement, even without a conference report.
Graham, Lindsey [R-SC]
SC • R
There are no cosponsors for this bill.
All Roll Calls
Yes: 102 • No: 95
senate vote • 2/21/2025
On the Concurrent Resolution S.Con.Res. 7
Yes: 52 • No: 48
senate vote • 2/18/2025
On the Motion to Proceed S.Con.Res. 7
Yes: 50 • No: 47
S2904 — SHADOW Fleet Sanctions Act of 2026
Targets the Russian “shadow fleet” with new sanctions and enforcement. The bill builds a layered regime that can blacklist vessels, ports, insurers, service providers, and firms tied to Russian energy and defense projects to stop maritime sanction evasion and harmful maritime behavior. - Maritime operators and insurers: The bill names twelve indicators of suspicious or unsafe ship behavior, such as turning off transponders and frequent flag changes, and allows sanctions on vessels plus owners, managers, insurers, and service providers involved in ship-to-ship transfers or facilitation. - Ports and international coordination: It authorizes sanctions on port terminals in the People’s Republic of China or India that accept Russian-origin oil sold above the price cap or linked to sanctioned vessels, and requires coordinated reporting and harmonization with EU and UK designation practices. - Energy, defense, and enforcement resources: It mandates recurring lists and reports on Russian energy projects and defense supply chains, applies visa bans and property-blocking to identified actors, and funds modernization and assistance for enforcement and support to Ukraine and allies. Authorizes roughly $460 million in specified appropriations for fiscal years 2026 and 2027 and creates ongoing reporting and enforcement duties that would increase federal spending.
S3366 — Back the Blue Act of 2025
Strengthens federal criminal penalties and legal protections for law enforcement, judges, and other public safety officers. This bill would create new federal crimes for killing or attempting to kill those officials, add a flight-to-avoid-prosecution offense, expand qualified officers' carry and self-defense rights in some federal facilities and school zones, and narrow some civil and habeas remedies.
S292 — Educational Choice for Children Act of 2025
Creates coordinated individual and corporate tax credits for donations to scholarship granting organizations to fund K–12 scholarships, while protecting parental choice and setting accountability rules. This bill would set up matching individual and corporate credits tied to qualified donations, define eligible students and expenses, and require oversight for scholarship organizations.
S1748 — Kids Online Safety Act
Protecting minors online is the core aim of the Kids Online Safety Act, which would make platforms that serve young users adopt a legal duty of care, add parental controls and safeguards, and force more transparency about recommendation algorithms. The bill targets design features that boost minor engagement and limits certain research on children to reduce mental-health and harassment risks. - Families and minors: The bill would define a "child" as under 13 and a "minor" as under 17, require verifiable parental consent for known children, and give parents tools to control privacy, purchases, and autoplay for streaming. - Platforms and products: Covered services would face limits on personalized design features, a ban on market research involving children under 13, and public reporting and independent audits of safeguards, including detailed de-identified data on minor usage for platforms with over 10 million monthly U.S. users. - Regulators, schools, and tech oversight: The Federal Trade Commission would enforce the rules with state attorneys general able to act as well, a Kids Online Safety Council of 11 members would advise and report within 1 and 3 years, and a separate title would force notice and opt-outs for "opaque" algorithms and let users switch to input-transparent systems.
S278 — Kids Off Social Media Act
Restricting children's access to social media accounts and limiting algorithmic targeting. This bill would bar most children under 13 from having social media accounts and would curb automated recommendation systems for users under 17. - Parents and children: Platforms would be prohibited from permitting accounts for children under 13 and must delete existing child accounts. Families could request a readable, portable copy of a terminated child’s personal data within 90 days. - Platforms and enforcement: Social media platforms would be barred from using personalized recommendation systems for users under 17, with a narrow exception that allows only basic attributes such as device type, language, city, and age for display purposes. The Federal Trade Commission would enforce the rules and state attorneys general could bring parens patriae lawsuits, and platforms would be limited in how they collect and retain compliance-related data. - Schools and E-Rate subsidies: Schools receiving discounted broadband under the Schools and Libraries (E-Rate) program would have to block social media on school-provided networks, adopt internet safety policies, and submit those policies to the Federal Communications Commission. Schools must certify compliance within 120 days of the first affected funding year and be fully compliant by the second program year or risk losing discounts and repaying funds.
S3774 — SCAM Act
Holds platforms responsible for paid deceptive ads unless they take reasonable steps to stop them. The bill forces online platforms to verify advertisers, run automated and manual detection, follow strict timelines for investigating and removing suspect ads, and opens multiple routes for enforcement and private lawsuits. - Consumers and families gain stronger protection from ads that make material misrepresentations likely to cause financial harm and can sue for actual damages with treble damages for willful violations and a 5-year statute of limitations. - Online platforms that accept payment must verify advertiser identity, keep contact information, run impersonation detection, investigate reports within 72 hours, and remove violating ads within 24 hours after a violation finding; platforms that submit an FTC‑approved program are presumed compliant. - Advertisers must provide legal name, physical location, government ID or business documents, and take steps to prevent verification circumvention. - Enforcement is led by the Federal Trade Commission treating violations as unfair or deceptive acts, state attorneys general can bring parens patriae actions after notice, and injured private parties have a defined private right of action; the Commission must issue implementing regulations within 1 year and deliver a regulatory report within 9 months.
Surfaced from PRIA's policy knowledge graph — ranked by signal strength, connected by evidence.
The federal government runs two closely related conservation-workforce pipelines on public lands: the Youth Conservation Corps YCC and the Public Lands Corps PLC. YCC is a summer employment program fo
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579 1952 — the "Steel Seizure Case" — is the Supreme Court's foundational decision defining the limits of presidential power, and the source of the most
The Uruguay Round Agreements Act URAA of 1994 19 U.S.C. §§ 3501–3624 implemented U.S. membership in the World Trade Organization WTO and incorporated the Uruguay Round trade agreements — the broadest
- WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding DSU, Annex 2 to the WTO Agreement — Establishes the WTO dispute settlement system: consultations, panel proceedings, Appellate Body review, adoption of reports,