Pay Our Coast Guard Parity Act of 2025
Sponsored By: Representative Scholten
In Committee
Summary
Continuity of pay and benefits for Coast Guard personnel during a Coast Guard-specific funding lapse is established and Coast Guard compensation is aligned with that of other armed forces. This creates a legal pathway to keep people paid and covered when Coast Guard appropriations alone are delayed.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
1 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.
Coast Guard pay during funding gaps
If enacted, this would keep Coast Guard pay and key benefits going during a Coast Guard-specific funding gap. Pay and allowances would continue for active-duty members and reservists on active service or in training. Qualified Coast Guard civilians and some contract workers would also be paid, as designated by the Commandant. If a member dies on active duty, dependents could get the death gratuity, funeral travel reimbursements, and a temporary basic housing allowance. Money would be provided at normal rates using such sums as necessary, then charged to the Coast Guard’s final funding once passed. Payments could be made without waiting for the usual budget apportionment timing. This would apply only when the Coast Guard lacks funding but the Defense Department is funded. Support would end when Congress acts on funding for the year, when Defense funding stops, or two weeks after the gap starts, whichever comes first.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Scholten
MI • D
Cosponsors
Barrett
MI • R
Sponsored 2/24/2025
Moulton
MA • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
DelBene
WA • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Brownley
CA • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Peters
CA • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Del. Moylan, James C. [R-GU-At Large]
GU • R
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Bonamici
OR • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Scanlon
PA • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]
DC • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Tokuda
HI • D
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Strickland
WA • D
Sponsored 3/6/2025
DesJarlais
TN • R
Sponsored 3/10/2025
Correa
CA • D
Sponsored 3/10/2025
Carbajal
CA • D
Sponsored 3/10/2025
Davis (NC)
NC • D
Sponsored 3/10/2025
Fitzpatrick
PA • R
Sponsored 3/10/2025
Tenney
NY • R
Sponsored 3/11/2025
Craig
MN • D
Sponsored 3/24/2025
Budzinski
IL • D
Sponsored 3/31/2025
McBride
DE • D
Sponsored 4/1/2025
Smith (WA)
WA • D
Sponsored 4/1/2025
Nadler
NY • D
Sponsored 7/14/2025
Bishop
GA • D
Sponsored 7/14/2025
Dingell
MI • D
Sponsored 7/14/2025
Cohen
TN • D
Sponsored 7/14/2025
Garcia (TX)
TX • D
Sponsored 7/14/2025
Moskowitz
FL • D
Sponsored 7/14/2025
Jacobs
CA • D
Sponsored 8/19/2025
Figures
AL • D
Sponsored 9/30/2025
Carson
IN • D
Sponsored 9/30/2025
Kennedy (NY)
NY • D
Sponsored 9/30/2025
Mackenzie
PA • R
Sponsored 9/30/2025
Carter (LA)
LA • D
Sponsored 9/30/2025
Pappas
NH • D
Sponsored 9/30/2025
Swalwell
CA • D
Sponsored 9/30/2025
Ruiz
CA • D
Sponsored 9/30/2025
Auchincloss
MA • D
Sponsored 9/30/2025
Van Drew
NJ • R
Sponsored 10/3/2025
Scott (VA)
VA • D
Sponsored 10/3/2025
Landsman
OH • D
Sponsored 10/3/2025
Veasey
TX • D
Sponsored 10/3/2025
Salinas
OR • D
Sponsored 10/3/2025
McDonald Rivet
MI • D
Sponsored 10/3/2025
Bacon
NE • R
Sponsored 10/3/2025
Begich
AK • R
Sponsored 10/3/2025
Goldman (NY)
NY • D
Sponsored 10/3/2025
Randall
WA • D
Sponsored 10/3/2025
Hoyle (OR)
OR • D
Sponsored 10/6/2025
Evans (PA)
PA • D
Sponsored 10/8/2025
Tran
CA • D
Sponsored 10/8/2025
Barragan
CA • D
Sponsored 10/8/2025
Gonzalez, V.
TX • D
Sponsored 10/24/2025
Soto
FL • D
Sponsored 10/24/2025
Morrison
MN • D
Sponsored 10/24/2025
Ivey
MD • D
Sponsored 10/24/2025
Mace
SC • R
Sponsored 2/12/2026
Pettersen
CO • D
Sponsored 2/20/2026
Wasserman Schultz
FL • D
Sponsored 2/20/2026
Titus
NV • D
Sponsored 2/26/2026
Sorensen
IL • D
Sponsored 2/26/2026
Hayes
CT • D
Sponsored 2/26/2026
Davis (IL)
IL • D
Sponsored 2/26/2026
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govRelated Bills
HRES70 — Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Congress should take all appropriate measures to ensure that the United States Postal Service remains an independent establishment of the Federal Government and is not subject to privatization.
Keep the U.S. Postal Service public and independent. This resolution would urge Congress to prevent privatization by framing USPS as a constitutionally authorized, self‑sustaining federal establishment that does not rely on taxpayer funding. It highlights USPS's scale and role: more than 630,000 employees including about 73,000 veterans, service to over 168 million addresses daily, and a central place in a $1.9 trillion mailing industry that employs roughly 7.9 million Americans. The text warns privatization would raise prices, cut services—especially in rural areas—and threaten e‑commerce and critical infrastructure.
HR842 — Nancy Gardner Sewell Medicare Multi-Cancer Early Detection Screening Coverage Act
Would expand Medicare to cover multi-cancer early detection screening tests. It defines eligible tests as certain FDA-cleared or approved genomic blood tests or comparable biological-sample tests and directs the Secretary to use the national coverage determinations process to decide when they are covered.
HR2102 — Major Richard Star Act
Establishes concurrent receipt for retirees with combat-related disabilities. This bill would let eligible retirees receive both military retired pay and veterans' disability compensation for the same months without the offset rules that currently reduce payments. - Families of disabled retirees: Veterans with combat-related disabilities would receive both retired pay and VA disability compensation for the same months, increasing their monthly household income. - Defense and VA payment rules: The bill would amend 10 U.S.C. 1413a and 10 U.S.C. 1414 to exempt retired pay from reductions under 38 U.S.C. 5304 and 5305 and add a clear monthly no-offset rule. - Implementation and technical changes: It renames and updates chapter sections, adjusts cross-references, and applies to payments beginning the first month after enactment.
HR2550 — Protect America's Workforce Act
Preserves federal employees' collective bargaining agreements. This Act nullifies the Executive Order titled "Exclusions from Federal Labor-Management Relations Programs." - Federal employees and unions: Collective bargaining agreements that were in effect on March 26, 2025 remain valid and continue to apply through each contract's stated term. - Federal agencies and federal funds: Agencies may not obligate or spend federal funds to carry out that Executive Order, and the Executive Order has no force or effect.
HR1262 — Mikaela Naylon Give Kids a Chance Act
Speeds and strengthens pediatric cancer drug development. It expands which cancer products companies must study in children, reshapes organ transplant network governance and fees, and adds new FDA international and transparency steps. - Children with cancer and researchers: Requires pediatric studies that produce clinically meaningful data on dosing, safety, and early effectiveness and widens the kinds of drug combinations studied. It also sets aside $25 million for pediatric drug studies in each of fiscal years 2026, 2027, and 2028. - Transplant patients and transplant network members: Changes Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network governance and financing by allowing quarterly registration fees, requiring those fees fund OPTN operations, improving electronic health record integration, and calling for a GAO review within two years. - FDA partners and drug makers: Creates an Abraham Accords Office to boost regulatory coordination and technical assistance abroad, and forces more transparency during generic (ANDA) reviews about whether generics are qualitatively and quantitatively the same as listed drugs. It also raises the Medicare Improvement Fund amount from $1.4 billion to $2.6 billion. Increases federal outlays by roughly $1.3 billion, driven by a $1.2 billion boost to the Medicare Improvement Fund and $75 million for pediatric studies, adding to federal spending.
HR17 — Paycheck Fairness Act
Strengthening pay equity by expanding who is protected and limiting employers from using past pay, the Paycheck Fairness Act would tighten how pay differences are justified and increase enforcement and data collection. - Workers and prospective employees would gain a ban on employer reliance on wage history and new nonretaliation protections for wage discussions. The bill lets a candidate voluntarily share prior pay only after a job offer and only to justify a higher wage. - Employers would face new civil penalties for wage-history violations starting at $5,000 for a first offense and rising by $1,000 per subsequent offense to a $10,000 cap. Affected workers could recover damages up to $10,000 plus attorneys’ fees and injunctive relief where appropriate. - Federal enforcement and oversight would increase. The EEOC and the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs would enforce the rules. The bill would create a National Equal Pay Enforcement Task Force and require expanded pay-data collection by EEOC, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and OFCCP from federal contractors. Provisions would take effect six months after enactment.
Take It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Create a free account to save research, track policy impacts, and unlock your personalized versions of these pages.
Already have an account? Sign in