Rights for the TSA Workforce Act
Sponsored By: Representative Thompson (MS)
In Committee
Summary
Applies the Title 5 federal personnel system to Transportation Security Administration employees. The bill would move TSA staff onto standard federal pay, hiring, and labor rules to preserve pay and strengthen workplace protections.
Show full summary
- Screening agents would gain Title 5 labor protections, including the ability to form a bargaining unit under Chapter 71 and continuation of existing pay and leave benefits during the transition.
- Federal air marshals and TSA criminal investigators would keep Law Enforcement Availability Pay (LEAP) and get overtime parity with the Fair Labor Standards Act, and certain premium pay would count toward pay and retirement calculations.
- Office of Personnel Management and payroll systems would be updated to Title 5 job series and pay rules within 180 days, the conversion would complete by Dec 31, 2025, and the Comptroller General would review recruitment, promotions, harassment policies, and require annual TSA workforce reports.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
7 provisions identified: 5 benefits, 1 costs, 1 mixed.
Move TSA workers to Title 5 by 2025
If enacted, TSA workers would move under Title 5 on a date set by the Secretary, no later than December 31, 2025. TSA could not change existing personnel policies after enactment, except limited updates to match annual pay and for emergencies with 7‑day notice to Congress. OPM and the National Finance Center would update job series and payroll within 180 days after enactment or by December 31, 2025, whichever is earlier. Workers with pending grievances could shift to Title 5 processes, and deadlines would pause until those rights start. The Secretary would consult the union within 7 days and share written plans before bargaining rules begin.
Protect pay and leave at conversion
If enacted, on conversion a worker’s adjusted basic pay and law enforcement availability pay would not go down. Accrued annual, sick, and other paid leave would carry over, subject to Title 5 limits. Part‑time screeners would get the same pay premiums as full‑time staff, and split‑shift pay where eligible. Emergency leave and group retention incentives could be used even if other Title 5 limits would block them.
Stronger union rights for TSA screeners
If enacted, within 90 days after enactment, Title 5 labor and appeal rules would cover TSA screening agents. The union certified on June 29, 2011 would be the exclusive representative. Bargaining would be national, with local bargaining only if both sides agree. Current agreements would stay until a new Title 5 agreement is signed.
Air marshal pay: LEAP, overtime, and caps
If enacted, starting on the conversion date, Federal air marshals would receive availability pay (LEAP) and overtime calculated so they are not worse off than under the Fair Labor Standards Act. For air marshals and criminal investigators hired before enactment, OPM would count pre‑Act premium pay toward pay and retirement. But for those hired before enactment, premium‑pay eligibility would be capped at the pre‑Act maximum set by TSA.
Oversight reports and retirement planning steps
If enacted, the Administrator would send an annual report to Congress within one year, covering morale, retention, and survey results. GAO would review hiring, promotions and diversity, harassment policies, and implementation within set timelines. An implementation review would start within 60 days after the conversion date, with a report due within one year after conversion. TSA would brief Congress on assaults within 90 days, propose a retirement‑pay plan within 90 days, and align background‑check rules within one year.
Funding to carry out workforce changes
If enacted, the bill would authorize whatever funds are needed to carry out these changes, available until spent. Actual money would still require a later appropriations bill.
No change to federal strike bans
This bill would not change federal laws that ban strikes by government employees. It would not authorize any strike activity that is illegal today.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Thompson (MS)
MS • D
Cosponsors
Connolly
VA • D
Sponsored 3/11/2025
DeLauro
CT • D
Sponsored 3/11/2025
McIver
NJ • D
Sponsored 3/11/2025
Underwood
IL • D
Sponsored 3/11/2025
Kennedy (NY)
NY • D
Sponsored 3/11/2025
Bacon
NE • R
Sponsored 3/11/2025
Fitzpatrick
PA • R
Sponsored 3/11/2025
Van Drew
NJ • R
Sponsored 3/11/2025
Malliotakis
NY • R
Sponsored 3/11/2025
LaLota
NY • R
Sponsored 3/11/2025
Lawler
NY • R
Sponsored 3/11/2025
Tonko
NY • D
Sponsored 3/14/2025
Garbarino
NY • R
Sponsored 3/14/2025
Jayapal
WA • D
Sponsored 3/14/2025
Bonamici
OR • D
Sponsored 3/14/2025
Norcross
NJ • D
Sponsored 3/14/2025
Wilson (FL)
FL • D
Sponsored 3/14/2025
Figures
AL • D
Sponsored 3/14/2025
Menendez
NJ • D
Sponsored 3/14/2025
Garcia (CA)
CA • D
Sponsored 3/14/2025
Tlaib
MI • D
Sponsored 3/14/2025
Barragan
CA • D
Sponsored 3/14/2025
McBath
GA • D
Sponsored 3/14/2025
Cherfilus-McCormick
FL • D
Sponsored 3/14/2025
Dingell
MI • D
Sponsored 3/14/2025
Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]
DC • D
Sponsored 3/14/2025
Davis (IL)
IL • D
Sponsored 3/14/2025
Titus
NV • D
Sponsored 3/14/2025
Swalwell
CA • D
Sponsored 3/18/2025
Casten
IL • D
Sponsored 3/18/2025
Casar
TX • D
Sponsored 3/18/2025
Williams (GA)
GA • D
Sponsored 3/18/2025
Kelly (IL)
IL • D
Sponsored 3/18/2025
Sherrill
NJ • D
Sponsored 3/18/2025
McClellan
VA • D
Sponsored 3/18/2025
Torres (NY)
NY • D
Sponsored 3/18/2025
Schneider
IL • D
Sponsored 3/18/2025
Nadler
NY • D
Sponsored 3/18/2025
Sherman
CA • D
Sponsored 3/18/2025
Cohen
TN • D
Sponsored 3/18/2025
Correa
CA • D
Sponsored 3/18/2025
Budzinski
IL • D
Sponsored 3/18/2025
Pallone
NJ • D
Sponsored 3/18/2025
Khanna
CA • D
Sponsored 3/18/2025
McGarvey
KY • D
Sponsored 3/18/2025
Magaziner
RI • D
Sponsored 3/18/2025
Ocasio-Cortez
NY • D
Sponsored 3/18/2025
Wasserman Schultz
FL • D
Sponsored 3/18/2025
Ramirez
IL • D
Sponsored 3/18/2025
Pingree
ME • D
Sponsored 3/18/2025
Goldman (NY)
NY • D
Sponsored 3/18/2025
Takano
CA • D
Sponsored 3/18/2025
Brownley
CA • D
Sponsored 3/18/2025
Mannion
NY • D
Sponsored 3/18/2025
Vargas
CA • D
Sponsored 3/18/2025
Houlahan
PA • D
Sponsored 3/18/2025
Lynch
MA • D
Sponsored 3/18/2025
Case
HI • D
Sponsored 3/18/2025
Moore (WI)
WI • D
Sponsored 3/18/2025
Deluzio
PA • D
Sponsored 3/18/2025
Sanchez
CA • D
Sponsored 3/18/2025
Moulton
MA • D
Sponsored 3/21/2025
Espaillat
NY • D
Sponsored 3/21/2025
Mullin
CA • D
Sponsored 3/21/2025
Watson Coleman
NJ • D
Sponsored 3/21/2025
Scott (VA)
VA • D
Sponsored 3/21/2025
Frankel, Lois
FL • D
Sponsored 3/21/2025
Waters
CA • D
Sponsored 3/21/2025
Salinas
OR • D
Sponsored 3/21/2025
McBride
DE • D
Sponsored 3/21/2025
Ansari
AZ • D
Sponsored 3/21/2025
Scanlon
PA • D
Sponsored 3/21/2025
Peters
CA • D
Sponsored 3/24/2025
Clarke (NY)
NY • D
Sponsored 3/24/2025
Johnson (TX)
TX • D
Sponsored 3/24/2025
Elfreth
MD • D
Sponsored 3/27/2025
Cisneros
CA • D
Sponsored 3/27/2025
Meng
NY • D
Sponsored 3/27/2025
Neguse
CO • D
Sponsored 3/27/2025
Conaway
NJ • D
Sponsored 3/31/2025
Latimer
NY • D
Sponsored 4/1/2025
Gillen
NY • D
Sponsored 4/1/2025
Pou
NJ • D
Sponsored 4/8/2025
Subramanyam
VA • D
Sponsored 4/8/2025
Garcia (IL)
IL • D
Sponsored 4/8/2025
Golden (ME)
ME • D
Sponsored 4/8/2025
Vindman
VA • D
Sponsored 4/8/2025
Horsford
NV • D
Sponsored 4/14/2025
Thanedar
MI • D
Sponsored 4/14/2025
Larson (CT)
CT • D
Sponsored 4/21/2025
Mrvan
IN • D
Sponsored 4/21/2025
Morelle
NY • D
Sponsored 5/14/2025
Chu
CA • D
Sponsored 5/14/2025
Riley (NY)
NY • D
Sponsored 5/14/2025
Suozzi
NY • D
Sponsored 5/14/2025
Meeks
NY • D
Sponsored 5/15/2025
Frost
FL • D
Sponsored 5/23/2025
Velazquez
NY • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Kamlager-Dove
CA • D
Sponsored 6/27/2025
Stansbury
NM • D
Sponsored 7/10/2025
Garcia (TX)
TX • D
Sponsored 7/10/2025
Jacobs
CA • D
Sponsored 7/10/2025
Gottheimer
NJ • D
Sponsored 7/10/2025
Garamendi
CA • D
Sponsored 7/21/2025
Friedman
CA • D
Sponsored 7/21/2025
Fletcher
TX • D
Sponsored 7/21/2025
Levin
CA • D
Sponsored 7/23/2025
Omar
MN • D
Sponsored 7/23/2025
Pettersen
CO • D
Sponsored 8/1/2025
Sewell
AL • D
Sponsored 8/1/2025
Harder (CA)
CA • D
Sponsored 8/1/2025
Evans (PA)
PA • D
Sponsored 8/1/2025
Scott, David
GA • D
Sponsored 8/1/2025
Doggett
TX • D
Sponsored 8/12/2025
Escobar
TX • D
Sponsored 8/12/2025
Carter (LA)
LA • D
Sponsored 8/12/2025
Fields
LA • D
Sponsored 8/12/2025
Carbajal
CA • D
Sponsored 8/12/2025
Olszewski
MD • D
Sponsored 8/12/2025
Sykes
OH • D
Sponsored 8/12/2025
Ryan
NY • D
Sponsored 8/12/2025
Raskin
MD • D
Sponsored 8/12/2025
Johnson (GA)
GA • D
Sponsored 8/12/2025
Lofgren
CA • D
Sponsored 8/12/2025
DeSaulnier
CA • D
Sponsored 8/12/2025
Gonzalez, V.
TX • D
Sponsored 8/12/2025
Leger Fernandez
NM • D
Sponsored 8/12/2025
Stanton
AZ • D
Sponsored 8/12/2025
Sorensen
IL • D
Sponsored 8/12/2025
Hoyle (OR)
OR • D
Sponsored 8/15/2025
Min
CA • D
Sponsored 8/15/2025
Hayes
CT • D
Sponsored 8/22/2025
Morrison
MN • D
Sponsored 8/22/2025
Dexter
OR • D
Sponsored 8/22/2025
Crow
CO • D
Sponsored 8/29/2025
Thompson (CA)
CA • D
Sponsored 9/9/2025
Moskowitz
FL • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Matsui
CA • D
Sponsored 10/3/2025
Castor (FL)
FL • D
Sponsored 10/24/2025
Brown
OH • D
Sponsored 1/20/2026
Vasquez
NM • D
Sponsored 1/20/2026
Green, Al (TX)
TX • D
Sponsored 2/24/2026
Simon
CA • D
Sponsored 2/24/2026
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govRelated Bills
HR2550 — Protect America's Workforce Act
Preserves federal employees' collective bargaining agreements. This Act nullifies the Executive Order titled "Exclusions from Federal Labor-Management Relations Programs." - Federal employees and unions: Collective bargaining agreements that were in effect on March 26, 2025 remain valid and continue to apply through each contract's stated term. - Federal agencies and federal funds: Agencies may not obligate or spend federal funds to carry out that Executive Order, and the Executive Order has no force or effect.
HRES70 — Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Congress should take all appropriate measures to ensure that the United States Postal Service remains an independent establishment of the Federal Government and is not subject to privatization.
Keep the U.S. Postal Service public and independent. This resolution would urge Congress to prevent privatization by framing USPS as a constitutionally authorized, self‑sustaining federal establishment that does not rely on taxpayer funding. It highlights USPS's scale and role: more than 630,000 employees including about 73,000 veterans, service to over 168 million addresses daily, and a central place in a $1.9 trillion mailing industry that employs roughly 7.9 million Americans. The text warns privatization would raise prices, cut services—especially in rural areas—and threaten e‑commerce and critical infrastructure.
HR17 — Paycheck Fairness Act
Strengthening pay equity by expanding who is protected and limiting employers from using past pay, the Paycheck Fairness Act would tighten how pay differences are justified and increase enforcement and data collection. - Workers and prospective employees would gain a ban on employer reliance on wage history and new nonretaliation protections for wage discussions. The bill lets a candidate voluntarily share prior pay only after a job offer and only to justify a higher wage. - Employers would face new civil penalties for wage-history violations starting at $5,000 for a first offense and rising by $1,000 per subsequent offense to a $10,000 cap. Affected workers could recover damages up to $10,000 plus attorneys’ fees and injunctive relief where appropriate. - Federal enforcement and oversight would increase. The EEOC and the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs would enforce the rules. The bill would create a National Equal Pay Enforcement Task Force and require expanded pay-data collection by EEOC, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and OFCCP from federal contractors. Provisions would take effect six months after enactment.
HJRES80 — Establishing the ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment.
Declares the Equal Rights Amendment part of the United States Constitution. This bill would assert that the ERA was ratified by the legislatures of three‑fourths of the states and that the time limit in House Joint Resolution 208 does not bar its validity. It creates no new programs, funding, or enforcement mechanisms and makes no administrative or jurisdictional changes beyond recognizing the amendment's constitutional status.
HR15 — Equality Act
Adds sexual orientation and gender identity to the federal definition of sex and creates a uniform, nationwide nondiscrimination framework across employment, housing, credit, education, public accommodations, jury service, and programs that receive federal funds. The bill would harmonize definitions, remedies, and rules of construction across multiple civil rights statutes to make enforcement and claims more consistent. - Workers: Private and federal employees would gain explicit protection from discrimination for sexual orientation and gender identity. The bill would update Title VII rules, expand remedies, and adjust bona fide occupational qualification rules to account for gender identity. - People using public places, students, and tenants: Public accommodations and education laws would explicitly bar discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. The Fair Housing Act would adopt the same definitions and protections to cover renters and buyers. - Borrowers, juries, and enforcement: The Equal Credit Opportunity Act would bar credit discrimination on these bases. Jury selection rules would be updated to prevent discrimination. The bill would also prevent the Religious Freedom Restoration Act from being used to challenge enforcement under the covered civil rights laws.
HR14 — John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2025
This bill would restore robust federal oversight of voting rights by rewriting Section 2 and creating a broad practice-based preclearance system. It sets new tests for vote-dilution and vote-denial claims, adds retrogression rules for actions on or after January 1, 2021, and requires extensive public notice, data disclosure, and observer powers. - Minority and language-minority voters: Provides clearer legal paths to challenge districting and practices that dilute or abridge votes, recognizes coalitions of minority groups, and applies retrogression rules to actions from January 1, 2021. - States and local election officials: Triggers preclearance using a 25-year lookback with numeric thresholds and creates an administrative bailout that requires demonstrating sustained compliance over a 10-year period to avoid coverage. - Enforcement, oversight, and courts: Expands who may sue to include private "aggrieved persons", centralizes observer authority in the Attorney General, and authorizes pre-suit inspection and information demands that courts may enforce or modify.
Take It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Create a free account to save research, track policy impacts, and unlock your personalized versions of these pages.
Already have an account? Sign in