Respect Parents’ Childcare Choices Act
Sponsored By: Representative Moore (WV)
Introduced
Summary
Shifts direct federal child-care payments to parent-controlled child care certificates while reauthorizing the Child Care and Development Block Grant through 2031. The bill also broadens who can be paid, strengthens religious-provider protections, and removes the current household and dependent care tax credit.
Show full summary
- Families: Changes eligibility rules by capping family assets at $1,000,000 and creating income tiers tied to State median income, including coverage up to 85% of the State median for unmarried-headed households.
- Providers and relatives: Explicitly recognizes in-home providers and relative caregivers, requires State plan protections, and mandates that payments to relative caregivers be at least 75% of family child care rates in the same area.
- Taxpayers and tax law: Repeals the household and dependent care tax credit for taxable years after enactment and updates several related tax-code rules affecting dependent care definitions and special spouse rules.
*Authorizes appropriations of $14.0 billion per year for fiscal years 2026–2031 and $50 million for each of two two-year pilots, which would increase federal spending if funded by future appropriations.*
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
7 provisions identified: 3 benefits, 2 costs, 2 mixed.
More CCDBG funding and quality set-asides
If enacted, the program would get $14 billion each year for 2026–2031. States would also set aside up to 9% of funds for quality improvements and another 3% for infant and toddler care. This could help keep child care help and quality efforts going across states.
Ends the dependent care tax credit
This bill would repeal the household and dependent care tax credit. The change would apply to tax years starting after enactment. Families who used this credit could owe more in taxes.
Stricter marital rules for some credits
If enacted, married couples would need to file a joint return to claim the affected credits. Some separated or living‑apart spouses could be treated as not married if they meet strict rules. These changes would apply to tax years starting after enactment.
Child care certificates and relative pay
The bill would require States to offer you a child care certificate and provide all direct help through certificates. You could use it with relatives or religious providers, and in-home and relative caregivers would count if they meet rules. States would have to pay relative caregivers at least 75% of the local family child care rate. If a marriage pushes income over the limit, help would continue for at least 6 months.
Pilots to boost relatives and prevent fraud
The government would run a 2‑year pilot within one year to help States verify eligibility and stop fraud, funded with $50 million. It would also run a separate 2‑year pilot within one year to increase the use of relative caregivers, also funded with $50 million, and deliver a report on rules that block relatives from caregiving. States would need to review relative‑caregiver rules at least every 5 years to remove unnecessary barriers.
New income and asset limits
If enacted, families with over $1,000,000 in assets would not qualify. Unmarried‑headed families could qualify up to 85% of the state median income. Two‑parent married families and certain married relative‑caregiver cases could qualify up to 70% of the state median income. Special rules for children in protective services would stay in place.
New rules on religious childcare and parental rights
States would not be allowed to license religious child care providers more harshly than similar nonreligious providers. Religious organizations could sue if States break these rules. The bill would also delete certain parental‑rights subsections from the program.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Moore (WV)
WV • R
Cosponsors
Higgins (LA)
LA • R
Sponsored 3/24/2025
Gill (TX)
TX • R
Sponsored 3/24/2025
Smith (NJ)
NJ • R
Sponsored 3/24/2025
Webster (FL)
FL • R
Sponsored 3/25/2025
Miller (WV)
WV • R
Sponsored 3/26/2025
Messmer
IN • R
Sponsored 3/27/2025
Miller (IL)
IL • R
Sponsored 5/7/2025
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govRelated Bills
HR3151 — SHIPS for America Act of 2025
Rebuild U.S. commercial shipbuilding and a U.S.-flag strategic fleet by pairing new tax credits, grants, and operating payments with stronger cargo-preference rules and workforce and innovation programs to restore domestic capacity and sealift readiness. It centralizes maritime strategy in a White House advisor and a Maritime Security Board and funds a broad set of industrial, port, and training programs to favor U.S.-built, U.S.-crewed vessels.
HR21 — Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act
Mandates care and penalties for infants born alive after an abortion. This bill would set standards of care, require reporting, create criminal penalties, and allow civil suits when an infant is born alive following an abortion. - Women and families: A woman on whom an abortion is performed may sue anyone who violates the law and recover objectively verifiable medical and psychological damages, punitive damages, and statutory damages equal to three times the cost of the abortion. Courts must award reasonable attorney's fees to prevailing plaintiffs and may award fees to defendants if a suit is frivolous. - Health care practitioners and facility employees: Any practitioner present at a birth resulting from an abortion must exercise the same professional skill, care, and diligence as for any other live-born infant of the same gestational age. Practitioners or employees who know of a failure to comply must immediately report the violation to appropriate State or Federal law enforcement. - Criminal and statutory consequences: Violators face fines, up to 5 years in prison, or both, and anyone who intentionally kills a born-alive infant is punished under the murder statute. The bill also updates chapter headings and adds statutory definitions for "abortion" and "attempt."
HR28 — Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act of 2025
Blocks people identified as male at birth from competing in athletic programs designated for women or girls under Title IX. The bill would define sex based solely on reproductive biology and genetics at birth and treat athletic programs tied to team participation as covered activity.
HRES719 — Honoring the life and legacy of Charles "Charlie" James Kirk.
Condemns political violence. The resolution condemns the assassination of Charles 'Charlie' James Kirk, honors his life and leadership, and urges swift justice while offering sympathy to his family.
HR2102 — Major Richard Star Act
Establishes concurrent receipt for retirees with combat-related disabilities. This bill would let eligible retirees receive both military retired pay and veterans' disability compensation for the same months without the offset rules that currently reduce payments. - Families of disabled retirees: Veterans with combat-related disabilities would receive both retired pay and VA disability compensation for the same months, increasing their monthly household income. - Defense and VA payment rules: The bill would amend 10 U.S.C. 1413a and 10 U.S.C. 1414 to exempt retired pay from reductions under 38 U.S.C. 5304 and 5305 and add a clear monthly no-offset rule. - Implementation and technical changes: It renames and updates chapter sections, adjusts cross-references, and applies to payments beginning the first month after enactment.
HR1301 — Death Tax Repeal Act
This bill would repeal the federal estate tax and the generation‑skipping transfer tax. It would also reshape gift tax rules by keeping tiered rates but creating a $10 million lifetime exemption indexed for inflation. - Heirs of people who die on or after enactment would not owe the federal estate tax. This removes that tax from those estates. - Donors and high‑net‑worth individuals would still face a gift tax, but under a tiered schedule from 18% to 35% and a $10 million lifetime exemption that is indexed for inflation after 2011. - Generation‑skipping transfers made on or after enactment would not be subject to the GST tax. Qualified domestic trusts for surviving spouses of decedents who died before enactment would follow transitional rules, including changed treatment of distributions after a 10‑year period beginning on the enactment date.
Take It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Create a free account to save research, track policy impacts, and unlock your personalized versions of these pages.
Already have an account? Sign in