National Infrastructure Bank Act of 2025
Sponsored By: Representative Davis (IL)
Introduced
Summary
Creates a National Infrastructure Bank to mobilize public and private capital for long‑term projects across transportation, energy, water, broadband, and affordable housing. The bank would use loans, preferred stock, and bonds with a Treasury backstop to finance multiregion projects and subsidize work in disadvantaged communities.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
14 provisions identified: 9 benefits, 0 costs, 5 mixed.
Charitable tax break for Bank donations
If enacted, donations to the Bank would count as charitable gifts. Taxpayers who itemize could deduct them under normal limits. This would apply to tax years ending after enactment.
Bank capital up to $500 billion
If enacted, the Bank could raise up to $500 billion in capital stock. People could exchange long‑term Treasuries or municipal bonds, or use cash, to buy shares. The Treasury could subscribe up to $100 billion in 30‑year bonds if needed. Capital would phase in: up to $150 billion by year 1, $300 billion by year 3, and $500 billion by year 5.
$5 trillion for infrastructure loans
If enacted, the Bank could lend up to $5 trillion for projects. Interest would be at least the similar Treasury rate or 1.6% a year. Disadvantaged communities could get interest subsidies if funds are available. The Bank would charge fees and could extend or renew loans only after audits and Board review. Losses beyond the Bank’s own reserves would be covered by the Treasury as a contingent obligation.
10% for disadvantaged small businesses
If enacted, at least 10% of the Bank’s yearly assistance would go through disadvantaged or HUBZone small firms. The minimum would be 10% of the Bank’s total assistance each year.
Strong oversight and public reporting
If enacted, a Special Inspector General would be appointed to audit and investigate the Bank and report each year. Agencies would need to assist the Inspector General. The Bank would post funded projects and amounts online and allow at least 30 days for public comment before final financing. The Bank would get yearly independent audits, and GAO would issue a review within five years.
How projects apply and get picked
If enacted, states, local governments, tribes, public utilities, private entities, and public‑private partnerships could apply online. The Bank would rate projects on jobs, growth, training programs, environmental and health benefits, domestic materials, and fit with regional plans. At least seven regional planning groups would help build project pipelines with public input. The Bank would also work with federal and state agencies to avoid duplicate efforts.
Startup funding to launch the Bank
If enacted, the bill would authorize $50 million for 2025 and $50 million for 2026. The funds would organize the Bank, set up the Board, and hire staff.
U.S.-backed bonds for the Bank
If enacted, the Bank could issue 5- to 10‑year registered bonds backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. It could keep a discount line with the Federal Reserve and borrow in markets. This would give the Bank steady funding options for projects.
Bank would be tax‑exempt
If enacted, the Bank would be added to the list of tax‑exempt Government corporations. It would not pay federal income tax for tax years ending after enactment.
Tax‑free dividends on Bank shares
If enacted, the Bank would issue preferred stock that pays semiannual dividends. Those dividends would be excluded from gross income for tax years ending after enactment. Shares would be non‑voting and callable for 20 years at current market value, with a redemption guarantee. Dividend rates would follow rules based on how shares are acquired.
Worker pay, hiring, and Buy America
If enacted, workers on Bank‑funded projects would be paid local prevailing wages. Covered States would require project labor agreements; other States must allow voluntary bargaining. Projects would use local and priority hiring and work with apprenticeship or workforce boards. Civil‑rights rules would apply to funding, hiring, and contracting. Buy America rules would apply, which could boost U.S. suppliers and affect project costs.
Bank deposits, not consumer loans
If enacted, the Bank could take deposits, pay interest, and handle clearing and payments. It would open offices and work with local banks, and avoid competing where locals offer the service. Its reserves could not exceed 14% of transaction accounts over $25 million. It would be barred from consumer lending and from investment banking.
Special budget and debt rules
If enacted, loans under this Act would not follow a key federal credit‑reform rule. For PAYGO, budget effects would follow the House Budget Committee’s printed statement before the vote. Bank debt would not be treated as a priority federal claim under a specific law.
State permits and compliance still required
If enacted, Bank funding would not replace State or local permits. States could still regulate investor returns and keep their own project rules. The Bank would require borrowers, contractors, and subcontractors to follow all applicable laws and confirm compliance in writing.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Davis (IL)
IL • D
Cosponsors
Velazquez
NY • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Frost
FL • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Landsman
OH • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Suozzi
NY • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
McGovern
MA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Ramirez
IL • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Amo
RI • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Smith (WA)
WA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Espaillat
NY • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Lynch
MA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Tonko
NY • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Pingree
ME • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Magaziner
RI • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Cleaver
MO • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Deluzio
PA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Garamendi
CA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Mullin
CA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Tlaib
MI • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Khanna
CA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Thanedar
MI • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Kaptur
OH • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Jackson (IL)
IL • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Johnson (GA)
GA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Torres (NY)
NY • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Goldman (NY)
NY • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Nadler
NY • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Latimer
NY • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Ryan
NY • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Garcia (IL)
IL • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Evans (PA)
PA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Carson
IN • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]
DC • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Boyle (PA)
PA • D
Sponsored 10/8/2025
Lee (PA)
PA • D
Sponsored 10/8/2025
Kennedy (NY)
NY • D
Sponsored 10/8/2025
Jayapal
WA • D
Sponsored 10/8/2025
Lofgren
CA • D
Sponsored 10/8/2025
Ross
NC • D
Sponsored 10/8/2025
Dingell
MI • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Panetta
CA • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Foushee
NC • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Leger Fernandez
NM • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Cherfilus-McCormick
FL • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Stansbury
NM • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Jacobs
CA • D
Sponsored 11/20/2025
Vasquez
NM • D
Sponsored 11/20/2025
Friedman
CA • D
Sponsored 11/20/2025
Watson Coleman
NJ • D
Sponsored 11/20/2025
Mannion
NY • D
Sponsored 12/4/2025
Ocasio-Cortez
NY • D
Sponsored 1/12/2026
Adams
NC • D
Sponsored 1/12/2026
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govRelated Bills
HR20 — Richard L. Trumka Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2025
Strengthens worker organizing rights and enforcement. The bill broadens who counts as an employee or joint employer and builds tougher remedies, penalties, and election rules to make organizing and bargaining easier to enforce and monitor. - Workers: Expands who is treated as an employee by tightening the three-part test for independent contractors and broadening the joint-employer test to include direct, indirect, and reserved control. It adds clear protections for strike participation and allows back pay without reduction and liquidated damages equal to twice awarded damages. - Employers: Requires prompt disclosure and new notice duties including a detailed voter list within two business days and multilingual employee notices. Noncompliance can trigger civil penalties including up to $50,000 per unfair labor practice, up to $10,000 per refusal to obey Board orders, and fines for posting or voter-list violations. - Elections, agencies, and unions: NLRB must adopt remote electronic voting within one year and aim to hold elections within twenty business days. The bill also boosts NLRB reporting and transparency, expands private suits, and creates new whistleblower protections and expedited enforcement.
HR15 — Equality Act
Adds sexual orientation and gender identity to the federal definition of sex and creates a uniform, nationwide nondiscrimination framework across employment, housing, credit, education, public accommodations, jury service, and programs that receive federal funds. The bill would harmonize definitions, remedies, and rules of construction across multiple civil rights statutes to make enforcement and claims more consistent. - Workers: Private and federal employees would gain explicit protection from discrimination for sexual orientation and gender identity. The bill would update Title VII rules, expand remedies, and adjust bona fide occupational qualification rules to account for gender identity. - People using public places, students, and tenants: Public accommodations and education laws would explicitly bar discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. The Fair Housing Act would adopt the same definitions and protections to cover renters and buyers. - Borrowers, juries, and enforcement: The Equal Credit Opportunity Act would bar credit discrimination on these bases. Jury selection rules would be updated to prevent discrimination. The bill would also prevent the Religious Freedom Restoration Act from being used to challenge enforcement under the covered civil rights laws.
HR14 — John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2025
This bill would restore robust federal oversight of voting rights by rewriting Section 2 and creating a broad practice-based preclearance system. It sets new tests for vote-dilution and vote-denial claims, adds retrogression rules for actions on or after January 1, 2021, and requires extensive public notice, data disclosure, and observer powers. - Minority and language-minority voters: Provides clearer legal paths to challenge districting and practices that dilute or abridge votes, recognizes coalitions of minority groups, and applies retrogression rules to actions from January 1, 2021. - States and local election officials: Triggers preclearance using a 25-year lookback with numeric thresholds and creates an administrative bailout that requires demonstrating sustained compliance over a 10-year period to avoid coverage. - Enforcement, oversight, and courts: Expands who may sue to include private "aggrieved persons", centralizes observer authority in the Attorney General, and authorizes pre-suit inspection and information demands that courts may enforce or modify.
HR2763 — American Family Act
This bill creates monthly child tax credit payments that replace the annual Child Tax Credit mechanism and add a separate credit for other dependents. It sets fixed monthly amounts, a monthly advance payment system, rules for presumptive eligibility, and enforcement for improper claims. - Families and parents: Parents get monthly payments of $300 per child age 6 and older, higher monthly rates for younger children, and a $2,400 payment for a child in their birth month. - Other dependents and income: A new $500 nonrefundable credit for other dependents is added and phases out for higher earners, with thresholds that vary up to about $400,000 depending on filing status. - Administration and safeguards: The IRS will deliver monthly advance payments, use presumptive eligibility and a submission portal, require child and taxpayer TINs, permit limited data sharing with other government entities, and can disallow claims for fraud with penalties including a 120-month bar for fraud and a 24-month bar for reckless or intentional disregard.
HR17 — Paycheck Fairness Act
Strengthening pay equity by expanding who is protected and limiting employers from using past pay, the Paycheck Fairness Act would tighten how pay differences are justified and increase enforcement and data collection. - Workers and prospective employees would gain a ban on employer reliance on wage history and new nonretaliation protections for wage discussions. The bill lets a candidate voluntarily share prior pay only after a job offer and only to justify a higher wage. - Employers would face new civil penalties for wage-history violations starting at $5,000 for a first offense and rising by $1,000 per subsequent offense to a $10,000 cap. Affected workers could recover damages up to $10,000 plus attorneys’ fees and injunctive relief where appropriate. - Federal enforcement and oversight would increase. The EEOC and the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs would enforce the rules. The bill would create a National Equal Pay Enforcement Task Force and require expanded pay-data collection by EEOC, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and OFCCP from federal contractors. Provisions would take effect six months after enactment.
HR18 — Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 2025
Expands background checks to most private firearm transfers. This bill would require unlicensed sellers to have a licensed importer, manufacturer, or dealer take possession of a firearm and run the federal background check before transferring it, while listing targeted exceptions. - Families: Certain loans and bona fide gifts between specified family members would be exempt if the transferor has no reason to believe the recipient is prohibited from possessing firearms. - Private sellers and dealers: Unlicensed sellers would need a licensee to take possession and process the transaction as dealer inventory so the existing background-check system applies. - Licensed-dealer paperwork: Licensees would have to give buyers a written notice and get a signed certification on a form the Attorney General prescribes. - Law enforcement and short-term use: The bill carves out exceptions for law enforcement, armed private security, military on duty, estate transfers, emergency transfers to prevent imminent harm, and temporary transfers at ranges or for hunting when the seller is present. - Administration and state authority: It would require the Attorney General to provide forms in English and Spanish and affirms it does not authorize a national firearms registry and preserves state lawmaking on the same subject.
Take It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Create a free account to save research, track policy impacts, and unlock your personalized versions of these pages.
Already have an account? Sign in