National Flood Insurance Program Reauthorization and Reform Act of 2025
Sponsored By: Representative Pallone
In Committee
Summary
Makes flood insurance more affordable and modernizes the National Flood Insurance Program. It caps annual premium increases, creates a means-tested discount program, tightens claims and appeals timelines, and funds mapping and mitigation improvements.
Show full summary
- Homeowners and renters: Yearly increases in covered costs are capped at 9% for a five-year period and policies can opt into monthly payments with a fee capped at $15.
- Lower-income households: A graduated discount program targets primary 1–4 family residences for households earning up to 140% of area median income. Congress authorized funding rising from $250 million in FY2024 to $600 million in FY2028 to support the assistance.
- Communities and local governments: Requires a building-level flood risk database and digital maps, authorizes $500 million per year for mapping through FY2029, and allows up to $1.0 billion per year for a National Flood Mitigation Fund for five years.
*This bill authorizes several billion dollars in new spending for assistance, mapping, and mitigation that would increase federal outlays if funded.*
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
21 provisions identified: 12 benefits, 1 costs, 8 mixed.
Up to $120,000 for compliance work
Each NFIP policy would include Increased Cost of Compliance coverage up to $120,000 per property. Eligible uses include approved mitigation, pre‑disaster projects, and certain buyout or relocation costs. Buyout/relocation aid would require the land to stay open space, limited new structures, and insurance and transfer‑notice rules with repayment if the notice is not given.
Flood insurance extended to 2030
This bill would extend the National Flood Insurance Program through September 30, 2030. During a funding lapse, FEMA would be able to use existing Fund money at the last approved operations rate and charge it back later. For five years, Treasury would not charge interest on certain NFIP debts, and an equal amount would go to a mitigation fund. If enacted after September 30, 2025, the extension would be treated as if it began on September 30, 2025.
More money for flood mitigation
If enacted, the bill would put $1 billion each year for five full fiscal years into the National Flood Mitigation Fund for state, local, and property‑level projects. It would also require a yearly set‑aside equal to 10% of the 10‑year average Disaster Relief Fund appropriations to help severe repetitive loss homes and properties with the largest Risk Rating 2.0 increases. The set‑aside would apply to money appropriated after enactment and could not be taken from the flood insurance fund.
25% premium hikes if you refuse help
If you refuse a full mitigation offer that covers 100% of costs and lets you stay in your home, your NFIP risk premium would rise 25% each year. The increase would continue until you accept the offer or your rate reaches an actuarially sound level. This would apply to refusals after enactment.
Faster, fairer NFIP claim decisions
FEMA would create an Independent Office for Policyholder Appeals within 180 days. You could appeal a denial within one year, and the office would decide within 90 days after it has what it needs. For new claims, FEMA or your insurer would decide within 60 days of your proof of loss, with one 30‑day extension, and interest if late. You could get your full claim file within one week, and final engineering reports would be protected and shared. A presumption would favor coverage for foundation damage after a flood unless a qualified engineering report shows direct earth movement; FEMA must set standards in 90 days. FEMA would issue mold‑prevention guidance within one year, and mold exclusions would be narrowed with protections for safety and hardship.
Bigger savings for flood mitigation
If you complete an eligible mitigation action, your NFIP risk premium would be cut by at least 10%. FEMA would publish the credit formulas within 60 days and launch a public premium estimator in 90 days that shows savings from specific actions. FEMA would count major community mitigation projects when setting rates and allow city‑block methods and raising mechanical systems as eligible mitigation. You could also get a one‑time premium credit up to $500 to cover an elevation certificate.
Caps on premium hikes and lapses
For five years, your NFIP charges could not rise by more than 9% in a year, with limited exceptions. If your policy lapses, you would have 90 days to renew at the same renewal rate. FEMA would also have to set up a fair, quick process to appeal property risk inputs used to set your premium.
Levee areas: fair rates, no mandates
In areas protected by an accredited levee, FEMA would not call it a special flood hazard area or require flood insurance. For non‑accredited levees, FEMA would set rules within one year to measure protection and set rates, and create an appeals process for communities. FEMA could not raise rates without enough data until the analysis is done and shared.
More help for lower‑income homeowners
The bill would define covered homes for a new means‑tested assistance program as primary 1–4 family homes and related personal property. Flood Mitigation Assistance grants would prioritize repetitive loss homes, homes with unaffordable premiums, and properties with losses above replacement value. A premium is ‘unaffordable’ if housing costs are more than 30% of a household’s adjusted gross income.
Surcharge relief for small nonprofits
Small businesses and 501(c)(3) nonprofits that own three or more structures on one property could avoid the NFIP surcharge on more than two detached buildings. To qualify, the owner would need to certify the savings will be used for flood mitigation on that property. FEMA would set the certification process within one year of enactment.
State and Tribal mitigation loan funds
FEMA could give grants to States and Tribes to start revolving loan funds for flood mitigation. Funding would be split 50% by share of insured properties and 50% by a premium‑per‑property formula, with a 15% cap per entity. Initial grants must distribute at least 75% within two years; later grants at least 90% within one year. Entities getting under $4,000,000 could give grants with a 25% non‑Federal match. Priority would go to low‑income homeowners and areas, and repayments would recycle for more projects.
Appeal first before suing NFIP
This bill would make you use FEMA’s appeal process before suing over an NFIP claim. You would file an appeal and wait for a final decision or 90 days after FEMA accepts it, then have one year to sue. You could not raise in court an issue you did not raise on appeal. The U.S. Attorney General would handle these cases and could not seek dismissal for good‑faith proof‑of‑loss mistakes. The appeal rule would start 180 days after enactment.
Higher coverage limits tied to mortgages
Fixed NFIP coverage caps would be replaced with a baseline tied to the largest mortgage Fannie Mae can buy. FEMA could raise the baseline only once every five years and could not lower it. FEMA could also sell policies meeting the new limits without some older regulations.
Stronger flood risk data and disclosures
After September 30, 2024, new NFIP coverage would generally require local laws that make sellers and landlords disclose flood history and risk before a buyer or renter signs. FEMA would build a property‑level risk database within five years; owners and leaseholders could access their entry. NFIP communities could be required to send elevation data for new permits, and FEMA would issue mapping guidance and appeals rules in 180 days. FEMA would also post yearly premium stats by state, county, and ZIP code.
Caps on insurer pay, agent minimums
NFIP insurers would be limited to at most 22.46% of their total NFIP premiums as reimbursement for selling and servicing policies. Insurers would have to pay agents at least 15% of the premiums the agent sells as commission. These limits would take effect upon enactment.
Tighter rules for private NFIP partners
Audits would treat underpayments and overpayments the same for penalties, with a safe harbor for non‑bad‑faith overpayments up to 4% of the policy limit. FEMA would post all reimbursements to private partners and only repay actual vendor costs, under a rule due in 90 days. FEMA could end certain vendor contracts for misconduct with at least 14 days’ notice and an appeal process, without early termination payouts. The bill would define the Write Your Own program and companies, and create an Agent Advisory Council to improve agent training, claims handling, and customer experience.
Stronger NFIP pricing and reporting rules
FEMA would have to compute the average historical loss year using generally accepted actuarial methods. The agency would also need to report how many affordability exceptions exist and list the county and state for each policy using an exception as of the report date. These changes could affect how rates are set and improve transparency.
More options for co‑ops and condos
Co‑op owners would be able to buy NFIP coverage on the same terms as condo owners. FEMA would also offer an optional rider to cover basements used as separate homes in certain older (pre‑FIRM) condo buildings. FEMA would update related rules within 180 days.
Help small towns cut premiums
FEMA would appoint a regional coordinator in every region to help small communities join and benefit from the Community Rating System. The bill would allow spending the sums needed, which would remain available until spent.
Monthly premium payments, $15 fee
You could choose to pay your NFIP premium monthly. If you opt in, FEMA could charge up to $15 per year for this option. FEMA could start a pilot or interim policy before issuing final rules.
New training rules for agents, adjusters
Insurance agents who sell NFIP policies would need a three‑hour course every two years approved by their home‑state insurance commissioner. Agents who do not finish could not sell flood insurance until they complete it. FEMA regional offices would train local floodplain managers, agents, and adjusters on damage rules and may give refreshers after major disasters. Agents licensed in multiple states would need to show proof to each state.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Pallone
NJ • D
Cosponsors
Higgins (LA)
LA • R
Sponsored 9/18/2025
Watson Coleman
NJ • D
Sponsored 2/24/2026
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govRelated Bills
HR1768 — Lower Costs for Everyday Americans Act
A single, wide-ranging package focused on health, drug-market transparency, and supply-chain resilience. It would combine major Medicare and Medicaid changes with strict pharmacy benefit manager reporting, public-health preparedness funding, and technology and consumer-safety rules. - Seniors, patients, and families would see Medicare and Medicaid coverage and payment shifts that affect telehealth, hospital-at-home waivers, low-income Part D copays, and a new pathway to cover multi-cancer early detection tests beginning in 2029. - Pharmacies, pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), and employers would face far-reaching transparency and contracting rules, a full rebate pass-through requirement for employer plans, and new audit and enforcement powers. Implementation funding includes major one-time FY2025 appropriations such as $188 million to CMS and $113 million to support PBM reporting and oversight. - Public-health workers, hospitals, and communities would get increased preparedness and countermeasure funding and new infrastructure supports. The bill authorizes Strategic National Stockpile funding (about $1.1 billion for FY2025), $52 million per year for regional biocontainment labs for FY2025–FY2026, and Commerce-led supply-chain mapping with confidentiality protections for voluntarily submitted data. Would increase federal spending by multiple billions through FY2025–FY2029 because it authorizes and directs numerous appropriations and program outlays.
HR3151 — SHIPS for America Act of 2025
Rebuild U.S. commercial shipbuilding and a U.S.-flag strategic fleet by pairing new tax credits, grants, and operating payments with stronger cargo-preference rules and workforce and innovation programs to restore domestic capacity and sealift readiness. It centralizes maritime strategy in a White House advisor and a Maritime Security Board and funds a broad set of industrial, port, and training programs to favor U.S.-built, U.S.-crewed vessels.
HR3069 — Medicare for All Act
This bill would create a national health insurance program called "Medicare for All" to provide universal, comprehensive health coverage for every U.S. resident. It sets the benefit package, bans cost‑sharing for covered care, negotiates drug and device prices, and phases existing federal coverage into the new system during a multi‑year transition. - Families and children: Covers maternity care, pediatric services, mental health, prescription drugs, dental, vision, and more with no out‑of‑pocket costs for covered items. Children under 19 become eligible one year after enactment. - Older adults and people with disabilities: Establishes an entitlement to medically necessary long‑term services and supports in home and community settings, prioritizes independence and supports activities of daily living, and removes the 24‑month Medicare waiting period for people with disabilities. - Providers and the health system: Creates regional offices, pays institutional providers with negotiated quarterly global budgets and individual clinicians via a national fee schedule, restricts private contracting for covered services for two years, and gives the Secretary authority to negotiate prices and, if needed, license manufacture of drugs.
HR2102 — Major Richard Star Act
Establishes concurrent receipt for retirees with combat-related disabilities. This bill would let eligible retirees receive both military retired pay and veterans' disability compensation for the same months without the offset rules that currently reduce payments. - Families of disabled retirees: Veterans with combat-related disabilities would receive both retired pay and VA disability compensation for the same months, increasing their monthly household income. - Defense and VA payment rules: The bill would amend 10 U.S.C. 1413a and 10 U.S.C. 1414 to exempt retired pay from reductions under 38 U.S.C. 5304 and 5305 and add a clear monthly no-offset rule. - Implementation and technical changes: It renames and updates chapter sections, adjusts cross-references, and applies to payments beginning the first month after enactment.
HR3543 — College for All Act of 2025
This bill would create a Federal–State grant partnership to fully eliminate tuition and required fees for eligible students at participating public colleges and Tribal Colleges and Universities (TCUs). It would also raise Pell Grant maximums, expand Pell uses to living costs, and start awards in 2026–2027. - Students and families: Eligible students at public two‑year and four‑year colleges and TCUs could have tuition and required fees covered beginning 2026–2027, with initial income limits applied to some 4‑year students in the first year. - States and institutions: Federal support phases down from 100% in 2026–2027 to 80% by 2030–2031, while States must meet maintenance‑of‑effort and accountability rules tied to faculty, aid, and per‑student spending. - HBCUs, MSIs, and student supports: Private nonprofit Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Minority‑Serving Institutions get a separate grant stream, and a new Inclusive Student Success fund starts with $10.0 billion for FY2026; TRIO funding rises to $3.0 billion.
HR51 — Washington, D.C. Admission Act
Full statehood for Washington, Douglass Commonwealth would admit the District of Columbia as a new state on equal footing, while defining a smaller federal "Capital" and setting staged transitions for courts, property, and federal programs. - Capital residents would gain full congressional representation: two U.S. Senators and one U.S. Representative. The bill also requires states to allow "absent Capital" residents to vote by absentee ballot in federal elections. - The U.S. House would be permanently increased to 436 members and apportionment would be adjusted beginning with the first decennial census after admission. - The bill defines the federal Capital with a required 180-day survey, preserves federal court, prosecutorial, prison, parole, National Guard, and employee benefit arrangements on a temporary basis, and phases those responsibilities to the State as it certifies the necessary laws and personnel are in place.
Take It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Create a free account to save research, track policy impacts, and unlock your personalized versions of these pages.
Already have an account? Sign in