Public Charge Clarification Act of 2026
Sponsored By: Representative Nehls
Introduced
Summary
Would redefine 'public charge' with a 12-month benefits threshold and a required published list of counted programs. It would also tighten sponsor proof rules and create a new public charge bond requirement in some cases.
Show full summary
- Immigrants seeking a visa, admission, or status adjustment would be inadmissible if they are likely to receive more than 12 months of covered benefits in any 36-month period. The decision would use a holistic review of age, health, family, finances, skills, prospective status, and affidavits of support, and it would exempt refugees, asylees, and service members and their dependents.
- Families and benefit recipients would see a broad set of programs counted as "public benefits," including cash assistance, SSI, SNAP, housing help like Section 8 vouchers, project-based rental assistance, public housing, and Medicaid with specified exceptions. The Department of Homeland Security would have 180 days to publish and keep an updated comprehensive list of covered benefits.
- Sponsors would need affidavits of support backed by documents showing income and assets at least 125 percent of the Federal poverty line. The bill would allow a public charge bond of not less than $10,000 to be required in some cases and forfeited if the person becomes a public charge within 10 years.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
5 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 4 costs, 1 mixed.
New public-charge bond requirement
If enacted, consular officers or immigration officials could require a public-charge bond to allow conditional admission. The bond would be not less than $10,000 and payable to the United States. The bond would be forfeited if the person becomes a public charge within 10 years. DHS would write rules on how the bond is administered, forfeited, or cancelled.
New public-charge test and rules
If enacted, this would create a concrete public-charge test. You would be a public charge if you get counted public benefits for more than 12 months in any 36-month period. Officials would decide inadmissibility using a total review of age, health, family, money, skills, and future status, with no single factor deciding the case. These changes would take effect 180 days after enactment and apply to applications pending on or filed after that date.
Which benefits count toward public charge
If enacted, this would define a long list of programs that count as public benefits. It would include SSI, TANF and other cash help, SNAP, most Medicaid (with a few exceptions), Section 8 vouchers, public housing, and certain health coverage subsidies. DHS would have to publish a full list in the Federal Register within 180 days and update it when new programs are added. New programs created after enactment could also be counted.
Stricter affidavit of support rules
If enacted, affidavits of support would be one factor in public-charge decisions but would not automatically overcome a negative finding. Sponsors would have to submit documents that show income, assets, and resources enough to keep the household at at least 125 percent of the Federal poverty line. The affidavit alone would not be enough to guarantee approval.
Exemptions and limits on waivers
If enacted, refugees, people granted asylum, and service members or their dependents would not be subject to the public-charge rule. At the same time, the bill would bar agencies from granting public-charge waivers to other nonexempt people unless Congress specifically allows a waiver. That means some groups gain clear protection, while others lose agency-level relief.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Nehls
TX • R
Cosponsors
Moore (AL)
AL • R
Sponsored 1/8/2026
Weber (TX)
TX • R
Sponsored 1/8/2026
Grothman
WI • R
Sponsored 1/8/2026
Roy
TX • R
Sponsored 1/8/2026
Gosar
AZ • R
Sponsored 1/8/2026
Harris (NC)
NC • R
Sponsored 1/8/2026
Hunt
TX • R
Sponsored 1/8/2026
Jackson (TX)
TX • R
Sponsored 1/8/2026
Gill (TX)
TX • R
Sponsored 1/8/2026
Fry
SC • R
Sponsored 1/9/2026
Babin
TX • R
Sponsored 2/12/2026
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govRelated Bills
HR425 — Repealing Big Brother Overreach Act
Ends the Corporate Transparency Act and removes its amendments from federal law. It also adjusts related U.S. Code citations and parts of the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 to reflect that repeal. - Repeals the Corporate Transparency Act as title LXIV of division F of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (Public Law 116-283) and removes all amendments made by that Act. - Edits Title 31, United States Code by removing or changing cross-references that mentioned section 5336 and updating references in sections 5321 and 5322. - Alters the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 by repealing section 6502 and striking or modifying portions of section 6509 as described in the bill.
HRES719 — Honoring the life and legacy of Charles "Charlie" James Kirk.
Condemns political violence. The resolution condemns the assassination of Charles 'Charlie' James Kirk, honors his life and leadership, and urges swift justice while offering sympathy to his family.
HR925 — Dismantle DEI Act of 2025
Bans many federal Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) practices across the federal government. The bill would define a narrow set of "prohibited DEI practices," require agencies to end DEI offices and related programs, and block similar DEI requirements for contractors, grantees, accrediting bodies, and parts of the military and financial regulators.
HR1181 — Protecting Privacy in Purchases Act
Stops payment systems from assigning merchant codes that single out firearms sellers. This bill would prohibit payment card networks and covered entities from requiring or assigning merchant category codes that identify a retailer as selling firearms, ammunition, accessories, or firearm components. - Firearms retailers: Businesses could not be assigned MCCs that are used only or primarily for firearms retailers, which limits one way transactions could be labeled. - Payment card networks and covered entities: Networks and processors would be barred from requiring merchants to use or from assigning MCCs that identify a business as a firearms retailer. - Federal enforcement and oversight: The Attorney General would set up a complaint process within 90 days after enactment, investigate complaints, demand remediation within 30 days, and may seek federal injunctions. The bill would preempt state and local rules on assigning or disclosing these MCCs while allowing narrow fraud and security compliance exceptions and require annual reports to Congress on investigations and effectiveness.
HR979 — AM Radio for Every Vehicle Act of 2025
This bill would require AM broadcast capability to be installed as standard equipment in passenger motor vehicles. It focuses on driver-accessible AM reception, allows digital AM audio to count for compliance, and links vehicle AM capability to emergency alerting through IPAWS. - Drivers and households: Built-in, driver-accessible AM reception would make it easier for people to get local AM stations and emergency alerts from their vehicles. The bill allows devices that receive digital AM to meet the requirement. - Vehicle manufacturers: The Department of Transportation would need to issue a rule within 1 year, with a general compliance deadline no later than 2 years after the rule is issued. Small manufacturers that produced no more than 40,000 passenger vehicles in 2022 would get at least 4 years to comply. - Oversight and emergency systems: States would be barred from imposing their own AM-access rules. The bill mandates interim labels and pricing protections for cars without AM, authorizes civil penalties and DOJ injunctions for violations, requires a GAO study and a congressional briefing within 1 year, and includes an 8-year sunset for the authority.
HR645 — National Constitutional Carry Act
This bill would create a national right to carry firearms in public for U.S. citizens who are otherwise eligible to possess firearms. It would stop states and localities from imposing criminal or civil penalties that block those citizens from carrying in public and sets clear definitions for "State" and "public." - Lawfully eligible U.S. citizens, including residents and nonresidents, would be protected from state or local criminal or civil penalties for carrying firearms in public. - States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and U.S. possessions (except the Canal Zone) could not enforce laws or practices that criminalize or indirectly dissuade public carry. - Private owners could still ban firearms on their premises if they give a clear, conspicuous prohibition, and locations that conduct weapons screening under state law are not covered by the new right. - The bill would also relabel the federal statute to call 18 U.S.C. § 927 "The right to keep and bear arms."
Take It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Create a free account to save research, track policy impacts, and unlock your personalized versions of these pages.
Already have an account? Sign in