Research About Meet PRIA

Support Data Sources Privacy Policy Terms of Service Your Privacy Choiceshello@policyrisk.com

© 2026 PRIA Technologies, LLC. All rights reserved.

PRIA provides educational policy intelligence and is not a source of investment, legal, or financial advice. Content is for informational purposes only.

™

Your Policy Risk Impact Agent

Research

At My Address
Federal Courts
Daily Briefings
Medicare & Social Security
Congressional Bills
Federal Register
Tariffs
Fed Decisions & The Economy
State Tracker
World Watch
U.S. Code
U.S. Constitution

Knowledge

Search Polipedia
Daily Briefings
Calculators
What is Policy Risk?
The Countdown

Company

About PRIA
Support

Get PRIA

Support Data Sources Privacy Policy Terms of Service Your Privacy Choices

hello@policyrisk.com

© 2026 PRIA Technologies, LLC. All rights reserved.

PRIA is a trademark of PRIA Technologies, LLC.

PRIA provides educational policy intelligence and is not a source of investment, legal, or financial advice. Content is for informational purposes only.

™

Your Policy Risk Impact Agent

California Statutes, Title GOV

California/Statutes

← All California coverage

Title GOV, California Gov. Code

1,005 chapters · 21,709 sections in this title.

All chapters in Title GOV21,709 Ch 1, Sovereignty of the State2,998 Ch 2, People of the State2,743 Ch 3, General Rules Governing Exemptions f…2,615 Ch 5, Health Care2,137 Ch 4, Financial Records and Tax Records1,755 Ch 6, Historically or Culturally Significa…1,067 Ch 7, Library Records and Similar Matters1,006 Ch 2.5, Medium of Payment413 Ch 11, Preliminary Drafts and Similar Materials396 Ch 3.5, Law Reform389 Ch 10, Personal Information and Customer Re…353 Ch 13, Private Records, Privileged Material…337 Ch 4.5, Unmanned Aircraft324

2,137 sections·Filtered byTitle GOV✕Ch 5✕

Gov. Code § 69590.5 Section 69590.5
0.1K chars
In the County of Napa there are six judges of the superior court. (Amended by Stats. 2002, Ch. 784, Sec. 255. Effective January 1, 2003.)
Gov. Code § 69590.7 Section 69590.7
0.1K chars
In the County of Nevada there are six judges of the superior court. (Amended by Stats. 2002, Ch. 784, Sec. 256. Effective January 1, 2003.)
Gov. Code § 69591 Section 69591
0.1K chars
In the County of Orange there are 109 judges of the superior court. (Amended by Stats. 2002, Ch. 784, Sec. 257. Effective January 1, 2003.)
Gov. Code § 69591.3 Section 69591.3
0.1K chars
In the County of Placer there are nine judges of the superior court. (Added by Stats. 2002, Ch. 784, Sec. 258. Effective January 1, 2003.)

Showing 801–850 of 2,137

Page 17 of 43

← Previous Next →

Gov. Code § 69591.7 Section 69591.7

0.1K chars

In the County of Plumas there are two judges of the superior court. (Added by Stats. 2002, Ch. 784, Sec. 259. Effective January 1, 2003.)

Gov. Code § 69592 Section 69592

0.1K chars

In the County of Riverside there are 53 judges of the superior court. (Amended by Stats. 2018, Ch. 45, Sec. 6. (SB 847) Effective June 27, 2018.)

Gov. Code § 69593 Section 69593

0.1K chars

In the County of Sacramento there are 52 judges of the superior court. (Amended by Stats. 2002, Ch. 784, Sec. 261. Effective January 1, 2003.)

Gov. Code § 69593.5 Section 69593.5

0.1K chars

In the County of San Benito there are two judges of the superior court. (Added by Stats. 2002, Ch. 784, Sec. 262. Effective January 1, 2003.)

Gov. Code § 69594 Section 69594

0.2K chars

In the County of San Bernardino there are 65 judges of the superior court. (Amended by Stats. 2017, Ch. 17, Sec. 20. (AB 103) Effective June 27, 2017.)

Gov. Code § 69595 Section 69595

0.1K chars

In the County of San Diego there are 128 judges of the superior court. (Amended by Stats. 2002, Ch. 784, Sec. 264. Effective January 1, 2003.)

Gov. Code § 69596 Section 69596

0.2K chars

In the City and County of San Francisco there are 50 judges of the superior court. (Amended by Stats. 2002, Ch. 784, Sec. 266. Effective January 1, 2003.)

Gov. Code § 69598 Section 69598

0.1K chars

In the County of San Joaquin there are 26 judges of the superior court. (Amended by Stats. 2002, Ch. 784, Sec. 267. Effective January 1, 2003.)

Gov. Code § 69598.5 Section 69598.5

0.1K chars

In the County of San Luis Obispo there are 11 judges of the superior court. (Added by Stats. 2002, Ch. 784, Sec. 268. Effective January 1, 2003.)

Gov. Code § 69599 Section 69599

0.1K chars

In San Mateo County there are 26 judges of the superior court. (Amended by Stats. 2002, Ch. 784, Sec. 269. Effective January 1, 2003.)

Gov. Code § 69599.5 Section 69599.5

0.1K chars

In the County of Santa Barbara there are 19 judges of the superior court. (Amended by Stats. 2002, Ch. 784, Sec. 270. Effective January 1, 2003.)

Gov. Code § 69600 Section 69600

0.1K chars

In the County of Santa Clara there are 77 judges of the superior court. (Amended by Stats. 2017, Ch. 17, Sec. 21. (AB 103) Effective June 27, 2017.)

Gov. Code § 69600.5 Section 69600.5

0.1K chars

In the County of Santa Cruz there are 10 judges of the superior court. (Added by Stats. 2002, Ch. 784, Sec. 272. Effective January 1, 2003.)

Gov. Code § 69601 Section 69601

0.1K chars

In the County of Shasta there are nine judges of the superior court. (Amended by Stats. 2002, Ch. 784, Sec. 273. Effective January 1, 2003.)

Gov. Code § 69601.3 Section 69601.3

0.1K chars

In the County of Sierra there are two judges of the superior court. (Added by Stats. 2002, Ch. 784, Sec. 274. Effective January 1, 2003.)

Gov. Code § 69601.7 Section 69601.7

0.1K chars

In the County of Siskiyou there are four judges of the superior court. (Added by Stats. 2002, Ch. 784, Sec. 275. Effective January 1, 2003.)

Gov. Code § 69602 Section 69602

0.1K chars

In the County of Solano there are 16 judges of the superior court. (Amended by Stats. 2002, Ch. 784, Sec. 276. Effective January 1, 2003.)

Gov. Code § 69603 Section 69603

0.1K chars

In the County of Sonoma there are 16 judges of the superior court. (Amended by Stats. 2002, Ch. 784, Sec. 277. Effective January 1, 2003.)

Gov. Code § 69604 Section 69604

0.1K chars

In the County of Stanislaus there are 17 judges of the superior court. (Amended by Stats. 2002, Ch. 784, Sec. 278. Effective January 1, 2003.)

Gov. Code § 69604.3 Section 69604.3

0.1K chars

In the County of Sutter there are five judges of the superior court. (Added by Stats. 2002, Ch. 784, Sec. 279. Effective January 1, 2003.)

Gov. Code § 69604.5 Section 69604.5

0.1K chars

In the County of Tehama there are four judges of the superior court. (Added by Stats. 2002, Ch. 784, Sec. 280. Effective January 1, 2003.)

Gov. Code § 69604.7 Section 69604.7

0.1K chars

In the County of Trinity there are two judges of the superior court. (Added by Stats. 2002, Ch. 784, Sec. 281. Effective January 1, 2003.)

Gov. Code § 69605 Section 69605

0.1K chars

In the County of Tulare there are 16 judges of the superior court. (Amended by Stats. 2002, Ch. 784, Sec. 282. Effective January 1, 2003.)

Gov. Code § 69605.5 Section 69605.5

0.1K chars

In the County of Tuolumne there are four judges of the superior court. (Amended by Stats. 2002, Ch. 784, Sec. 283. Effective January 1, 2003.)

Gov. Code § 69606 Section 69606

0.1K chars

In the County of Ventura there are 28 judges of the superior court. (Amended by Stats. 2002, Ch. 784, Sec. 284. Effective January 1, 2003.)

Gov. Code § 69610 Section 69610

0.1K chars

In the County of Yolo there are nine judges of the superior court. (Amended by Stats. 2002, Ch. 784, Sec. 288. Effective January 1, 2003.)

Gov. Code § 69611 Section 69611

0.1K chars

In the County of Yuba there are five judges of the superior court. (Amended by Stats. 2002, Ch. 784, Sec. 289. Effective January 1, 2003.)

Gov. Code § 69614 Section 69614

1.8K chars

(a) Upon appropriation by the Legislature in the 2006–07 fiscal year, there shall be 50 additional judges allocated to the various superior courts pursuant to the uniform criteria described in subdivision (b) for determining the need for additional superior court judges. (b) The …

Gov. Code § 69614.2 Section 69614.2

0.4K chars

Upon appropriation by the Legislature in the 2007–08 fiscal year, there shall be 50 additional judges allocated to the various county superior courts, pursuant to the uniform criteria described in subdivision (b) of Section 69614, as updated and approved by the Judicial Council. …

Gov. Code § 69614.3 Section 69614.3

1.0K chars

Upon appropriation by the Legislature, the 100 additional new judges provided for in Sections 69614 and 69614.2 shall be allocated to the various county superior courts, pursuant to the following appointment schedule: (a) On or before June 30, 2008, 40 additional judges shall be …

Gov. Code § 69614.4 Section 69614.4

0.9K chars

(a) Notwithstanding any other law, two vacant judgeships from the Superior Court of the County of Santa Clara shall be reallocated to the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, and two vacant judgeships from the Superior Court of the County of Alameda shall be reallocated to …

Gov. Code § 69614.5 Section 69614.5

0.4K chars

Twenty-six additional superior court judgeships are authorized, subject to appropriation. These positions shall be allocated by the Judicial Council to the various county superior courts, in accordance with the uniform criteria described in subdivision (b) of Section 69614, as up…

Gov. Code § 69615 Section 69615

5.6K chars

(a) It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this section to restore an appropriate balance between subordinate judicial officers and judges in the trial courts by providing for the conversion, as needed, of subordinate judicial officer positions to judgeships in courts th…

Gov. Code § 69616 Section 69616

0.8K chars

(a) The Legislature hereby ratifies the authority of the Judicial Council to convert 10 subordinate judicial officer positions to judgeships in the 2011–12 fiscal year where the conversion will result in a judge being assigned to a family law or juvenile law assignment previously…

Gov. Code § 69617 Section 69617

0.8K chars

(a) The Legislature hereby ratifies the authority of the Judicial Council to convert 10 subordinate judicial officer positions to judgeships in the 2013–14 fiscal year where the conversion will result in a judge being assigned to a family law or juvenile law assignment previously…

Gov. Code § 69618 Section 69618

0.8K chars

(a) The Legislature hereby ratifies the authority of the Judicial Council to convert 10 subordinate judicial officer positions to judgeships in the 2014–15 fiscal year when the conversion will result in a judge being assigned to a family law or juvenile law assignment previously …

Gov. Code § 69619 Section 69619

0.8K chars

(a) The Legislature hereby ratifies the authority of the Judicial Council to convert 10 subordinate judicial officer positions to judgeships in the 2015–16 fiscal year when the conversion will result in a judge being assigned to a family law or juvenile law assignment previously …

Gov. Code § 69619.5 Section 69619.5

0.8K chars

(a) The Legislature hereby ratifies the authority of the Judicial Council to convert 10 subordinate judicial officer positions to judgeships in the 2016–17 fiscal year when the conversion will result in a judge being assigned to a family law or juvenile law assignment previously …

Gov. Code § 69619.6 Section 69619.6

0.8K chars

(a) The Legislature hereby ratifies the authority of the Judicial Council to convert 10 subordinate judicial officer positions to judgeships in the 2017–18 fiscal year when the conversion will result in a judge being assigned to a family law or juvenile law assignment previously …

Gov. Code § 7926.200 Section 7926.200

0.4K chars

The provisions listed in Section 7920.505 do not prevent any health facility from disclosing to a certified bargaining agent relevant financing information pursuant to Section 8 of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. Sec. 158). (Added by Stats. 2021, Ch. 614, Sec. 2. (AB …

Gov. Code § 7926.205 Section 7926.205

1.7K chars

(a) Nothing in this division or any other provision of law requires disclosure of records of a health plan that is licensed pursuant to the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975 (Chapter 2.2 (commencing with Section 1340) of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code) and…

Gov. Code § 7926.210 Section 7926.210

0.9K chars

(a) Except as provided in subdivision (b) or in Sections 7924.510, 7924.700, and 7929.610, this division does not require disclosure of any records of a local hospital district, formed pursuant to Division 23 (commencing with Section 32000) of the Health and Safety Code, or a mun…

Gov. Code § 7926.215 Section 7926.215

2.5K chars

(a) Except as provided in Sections 7924.510, 7924.700, and the provisions listed in Section 7920.505, this division does not require disclosure of records of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation that relate to health care services contract negotiations, and that revea…

Gov. Code § 7926.220 Section 7926.220

2.3K chars

(a) Except as provided in Sections 7924.510, 7924.700, and 7929.610, this division does not require disclosure of records of a state agency related to activities governed by Article 2.6 (commencing with Section 14081), Article 2.8 (commencing with Section 14087.5), or Article 2.9…

Gov. Code § 7926.225 Section 7926.225

3.1K chars

(a) Except as provided in Sections 7924.510, 7924.700, and 7929.610, this division does not require disclosure of records of the Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board and the State Department of Health Care Services that relate to activities governed by former Part 6.3 (commencing…

Gov. Code § 7926.230 Section 7926.230

3.8K chars

(a) Except as provided in Sections 7924.510, 7924.700, and 7929.610, this division does not require disclosure of records of the Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board and the State Department of Health Care Services related to activities governed by Part 6.2 (commencing with Secti…