Udoinyion v

Michelin N. Am., Inc., 313 Ga. App. 248, 721 S.E.2d 190 (2011). Exclusion of court reporter’s audio recording of plea hearing. — Trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding the court reporter’s audio recording of the plea hearing because the defendant did not attempt to supplement the transcript using the proper procedures; the trial court did not err in considering the audio recording to be irrelevant as the court well recalled the hearing and the persons affected during the hearing; and, while the defendant contended that the emotion that was exhibited during the hearing was due to being pressured to plead guilty, the defendant did not suggest that the recording of the hearing contained any characteristic that revealed the reason for the emotions displayed, and thus failed to show why the true, complete, and correct record of the plea hearing needed to be supplemented. DeToma v. State, 296 Ga. 90, 765 S.E.2d 596 (2014). Cited in Estep v. State, 129 Ga. App. 909, 201 S.E.2d 809 (1973); Reed v. State, 130 Ga. App. 659, 204 S.E.2d 335 (1974). 221 15-14-6