Before the printout was submitted to the jury, the trial court required that the prejudicial information on the printout be redacted

Hann v. State, 292 Ga. App. 719, 665 S.E.2d 731, 2008 Ga. App. LEXIS 851 (2008) (decided under former O.C.G.A. § 24-3-17). Insufficient foundation for admission of evidence. — Testimony of an employee of the county solicitor’s (now district attorney) office that the employee had obtained a copy of defendant’s driving record from the state patrol office was not sufficient foundation for admission of the record. Tolbert v. State, 227 Ga. App. 647, 490 S.E.2d 183 (decided under former O.C.G.A. § 24-3-17). Ineffective assistance of counsel for failing to object to officer’s hearsay testimony. — Appellate court reversed the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion for a new trial with respect to the two misdemeanor traffic violations because the prejudice from trial counsel’s failure to object was clear since the officer’s hearsay testimony was the only evidence offered to prove the elements of the traffic offenses and had the evidence been excluded, there would not have been sufficient evidence to convict on those offenses. Taylor v. State, 337 Ga. App. 486, 788 S.E.2d 97, 2016 Ga. App. LEXIS 357 (2016). CHAPTER 10 BEST EVIDENCE RULE Sec. 24-10-1001. 24-10-1002. 24-10-1003.