Repealed

K.S.A. 19-2913 — under PLANNING AND ZONING.

K.S.A. 19-2913

19-2913. History: L. 1939, ch. 165, § 13; L. 1980, ch. 63, § 2; Repealed, L. 1991, ch. 56, § 28; January 1, 1992. CASE ANNOTATIONS 1. Civil code applies; commissioners may defend and appeal to supreme court. Appleby v. Board of County Comm'rs, 166 Kan. 494, 495, 203 P.2d 224. 2. Reasonableness of board's action in issuing building permit determined. Duggins v. Board of County Commissioners, 179 Kan. 101, 102, 293 P.2d 258. 3. Zoning classification order held to be reasonable. Konitz v. Board of County Commissioners, 180 Kan. 230, 231, 303 P.2d 180. 4. Burden of establishing unreasonableness of zoning regulation is upon plaintiff. Bodine v. City of Overland Park, 198 Kan. 371, 382, 424 P.2d 513. 5. Court must determine in a de novo hearing whether a non-conforming use has been abandoned. Union Quarries, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners, 206 Kan. 268, 274, 275, 478 P.2d 181. 6. Trial court's judgment that city denial of rezoning was unreasonable upheld. Golden v. City of Overland Park, 224 Kan. 591, 599, 584 P.2d 130. 7. Reasonableness of board's action in disapproving rezoning application determined. Combined Investment Co. v. Board of Butler County Comm'rs., 227 Kan. 17, 28, 605 P.2d 533. 8. Appeal taken hereunder; exemption of buildings devoted to agricultural purposes from county zoning regulations pursuant to K.S.A. 19-2921 includes dwelling place. Blauvelt v. Board of Leavenworth County Comm'rs., 227 Kan. 110, 111, 605 P.2d 132. 9. Time limitation for seeking judicial review hereunder is the period fixed by K.S.A. 19-223. Bolser v. Zoning Board for Aubry Township, 228 Kan. 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14, 612 P.2d 563; reversing 4 Kan. App. 2d 288, 605 P.2d 156. 10. Action to test validity of conditional use permit barred because appeal not taken within thirty days after order of issuance. Amerine v. Board of Jefferson County Comm'rs, 7 Kan. App. 2d 491, 493, 644 P.2d 477 (1982). 11. Cited in holding that validity of city zoning ordinance reviewable only under K.S.A. 12-712; K.S.A. 60-1701 inapplicable. St. John v. City of Salina, 9 Kan. App. 2d 636, 638, 684 P.2d 464 (1984). 12. Cited; term "regulation" in K.S.A. 12-712 includes actions on special use permits and provides procedures for obtaining appellate review. Sprint Print, Inc. v. City of Overland Park, 238 Kan. 230, 234, 235, 708 P.2d 210 (1985). 13. Reasonableness as the standard for review in considering factors regarding rezoning considered. Landau v. City Council of Overland Park, 244 Kan. 257, 263, 767 P.2d 1290 (1989). Previous | Next LEGISLATIVE COORDINATING COUNCIL General Policies 2026 Archived LCC Documents Archived LCC Meetings REVISOR OF STATUTES Archived Session Documents Archived School Finance Documents USEFUL LINKS Session Laws Kansas Administrative Regulations OTHER LEGISLATIVE SITES Kansas Legislature Administrative Services Division of Post Audit Research Department Contact Us PDF Help www.ksrevisor.gov 2026