Repealed

21-3815. History: L. 1969, ch. 180, § 21-3815; L. 1992, ch. 239, § 159; L. 1993, ch. 291, § 108; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011. Source or Prior Law: 21-712, 21-746. Attorney General's Opinions: Victim impact statement does not attempt to improperly influence judge. 96-13. CASE ANNOTATIONS 1. Section construed; not constitutionally impermissible. State v. Torline, 215 Kan. 539, 540, 541, 542, 543, 545, 527 P.2d 994. 2. Term "with intent to improperly influence" construed; evidence insufficient to sustain conviction. State v. Torline, 215 Kan. 539, 540, 541, 542, 543, 545, 527 P.2d 994. 3. On certified question, Kansas does not recognize a common law tort action for embracery; expert witness misconduct discussed. OMI Holdings, Inc. v. Howell, 260 Kan. 305, 320, 340, 918 P.2d 1274 (1996). 4. Defendants sent letter to judge suggesting leniency toward convicted drug dealer; evidence not sufficient that crime committed. State v. McNeal, 262 Kan. 551, 940 P.2d 34 (1997). Previous | Next LEGISLATIVE COORDINATING COUNCIL General Policies 2026 Archived LCC Documents Archived LCC Meetings REVISOR OF STATUTES Archived Session Documents Archived School Finance Documents USEFUL LINKS Session Laws Kansas Administrative Regulations OTHER LEGISLATIVE SITES Kansas Legislature Administrative Services Division of Post Audit Research Department Contact Us PDF Help www.ksrevisor.gov 2026