Repealed

38-1681. History: L. 1982, ch. 182, § 112; L. 1996, ch. 229, § 93; L. 1997, ch. 156, § 73; L. 1997, ch. 156, § 74; L. 1999, ch. 156, § 19; Repealed, L. 2006, ch. 169, § 140; January 1, 2007. Cross References to Related Sections: Report of disposition of certain appeals, see 8-253. Law Review and Bar Journal References: "Juvenile Law: Juvenile Involuntarily Absent from a Waiver Hearing is Not Denied Due Process [State v. Muhammad, 237 Kan. 850, 703 P.2d 835 (1985)]," Daniel J. Gronniger, 25 W.L.J. 598, 602, 605 (1986). "Kansas Appellate Advocacy: An Inside View of Common-Sense Strategy," Patrick Hughes, 66 J.K.B.A. No. 2, 26 (1997). CASE ANNOTATIONS 1. Cited in holding no appellate review of refusal of jury trial in juvenile offender proceeding. Findlay v. State, 235 Kan. 462, 465, 681 P.2d 20 (1984). 2. Noted; proceedings waiving juvenile jurisdiction under K.S.A. 38-1601 et seq. in juvenile's absence discussed. State v. Muhammad, 237 Kan. 850, 851, 703 P.2d 835 (1985). 3. No error in failing to advise on appeal rights when defendant no longer "juvenile offender" (K.S.A. 38-1602(b)(3)) examined. Reubke v. State, 11 Kan. App. 2d 353, 355, 720 P.2d 1141 (1986). 4. Notice of appeal timely filed after adjudication while none filed after disposition reaches merits of adjudication. In re M.O., 13 Kan. App. 2d 381, 382, 770 P.2d 856 (1989). 5. Cited where driving with suspended license (K.S.A. 8-262) held not a "traffic offense" under K.S.A. 8-2117(d); minor over 14 years subject to code. State v. Frazier, 248 Kan. 963, 967, 811 P.2d 1240 (1991). 6. Adjudication and disposition are separate legal events; K.S.A. 38-1602(b)(3) applied to 17-year old notwithstanding no disposition made on second offense. State v. Fultz, 24 Kan. App. 2d 242, 246, 943 P.2d 938 (1997). 7. Substantial evidence existed to authorize prosecution as adult under K.S.A. 38-1636 (f) notwithstanding judge's failure to mention statutory factors of K.S.A. 38-1636 (e). State v. Avalos, 266 Kan. 517, 518, 974 P.2d 97 (1999). 8. Respondent is deemed adjudicated as a juvenile offender when conviction is affirmed but order authorizing prosecution as an adult is reversed. State v. Smith, 268 Kan. 222, 244, 993 P.2d 1213 (1999). 9. Section gives defendant right to appeal adjudication as adult even though defendant entered plea of nolo contendre. State v. Ransom, 268 Kan. 653, 999 P.2d 272 (2000). 10. Cited in holding adult convictions reversed for failure to follow juvenile code; no district court jurisdiction. State v. Breedlove, 285 Kan. 1006, 1010, 1014 to 1016, 179 P.3d 1115 (2008). 11. No appellate jurisdiction to consider the issues on judicial determination to waive juvenile jurisdiction despite the district court's failure to inform a juvenile of the items in K.S.A. 38-1636 (c)(2). State v. Ellmaker, 289 Kan. 1132, 221 P.3d 1105 (2009). Previous | Next LEGISLATIVE COORDINATING COUNCIL General Policies 2026 Archived LCC Documents Archived LCC Meetings REVISOR OF STATUTES Archived Session Documents Archived School Finance Documents USEFUL LINKS Session Laws Kansas Administrative Regulations OTHER LEGISLATIVE SITES Kansas Legislature Administrative Services Division of Post Audit Research Department Contact Us PDF Help www.ksrevisor.gov 2026