Repealed

57-102. History: L. 1889, ch. 182, § 2; R.S. 1923, 57-102; Repealed, L. 1951, ch. 333, § 1; March 29. CASE ANNOTATIONS 1. Validity of note which does not contain required provisions. Mason v. McLeod, 57 Kan. 105, 108, 45 P. 76; Pinney v. Bank, 68 Kan. 223, 227, 229, 75 P. 119; Pinney v. Bank, 70 Kan. 879, 78 P. 151; Nyhart v. Kubach, 76 Kan. 154, 90 P. 796; Tredick v. Walters, 81 Kan. 828, 106 P. 1067; Bolte v. Sparks, 85 Kan. 13, 116 P. 224; Trust Co. v. McCoy, 86 Kan. 588, 594, 121 P. 1090; Grimm v. Kubach, 88 Kan. 649, 129 P. 943. 2. If statute not complied with rescission may be had. Allen v. Riley, 71 Kan. 378, 80 P. 952. Affirmed: Allen v. Riley, 203 U.S. 347, 27 S. Ct. 95, 51 L. Ed. 216. 3. Sale of patent right; contract is indivisible. Ridgway v. Wetterhold, 96 Kan. 736, 153 P. 490. 4. Contract for sale of patent right is within the statute. Hager v. Hale, 110 Kan. 507, 508, 204 P. 529; Schmoyer v. Van Hosen, 111 Kan. 759, 761, 762, 208 P. 554. 5. Statute not followed, notes unenforceable; compromise pending appeal upheld. Hager v. Hale, 117 Kan. 98, 230 P. 327. 6. Note held by endorsee knowing of noncompliance with statute, invalid; renewal. Yuncker v. English, 121 Kan. 425, 247 P. 637. 7. Statute not followed; sale contract illegal, void; action not maintainable. Sage v. Oil Country Specialties Mfg. Co., 138 Kan. 501, 511, 27 P.2d 542. 8. Contract for sale of patent unenforceable if statute not followed. Kreimer v. Midland Industries, Inc., 164 Kan. 325, 326, 188 P.2d 660. Previous | Next LEGISLATIVE COORDINATING COUNCIL General Policies 2026 Archived LCC Documents Archived LCC Meetings REVISOR OF STATUTES Archived Session Documents Archived School Finance Documents USEFUL LINKS Session Laws Kansas Administrative Regulations OTHER LEGISLATIVE SITES Kansas Legislature Administrative Services Division of Post Audit Research Department Contact Us PDF Help www.ksrevisor.gov 2026