Repealed

58-2213. History: G.S. 1868, ch. 22, § 11; R.S. 1923, 67-213; Repealed, L. 1984, ch. 201, § 17; July 1. CASE ANNOTATIONS 1. Acknowledgment examined and held sufficient. Munger v. Baldridge, 41 Kan. 236, 242, 21 P. 159. Questioned: Nagle v. Tieperman, 74 Kan. 32, 42, 85 P. 941, 88 P. 969. 2. Certificate only prima facie evidence; notary competent witness. Heaton v. Bank, 59 Kan. 281, 288, 52 P. 876. 3. Liability of notary for damages; false statement in acknowledgment of deed. Bellport v. Harkins, 104 Kan. 543, 545, 180 P. 220. 4. Substance of these requirements is all that is essential. Mathewson, Administrator, v. Richards, 114 Kan. 500, 503, 220 P. 185. Previous | Next LEGISLATIVE COORDINATING COUNCIL General Policies 2026 Archived LCC Documents Archived LCC Meetings REVISOR OF STATUTES Archived Session Documents Archived School Finance Documents USEFUL LINKS Session Laws Kansas Administrative Regulations OTHER LEGISLATIVE SITES Kansas Legislature Administrative Services Division of Post Audit Research Department Contact Us PDF Help www.ksrevisor.gov 2026