Repealed

58-303. History: G.S. 1868, ch. 68, § 11; L. 1903, ch. 364, § 1; R.S. 1923, 58-303; L. 1955, ch. 270, § 1; L. 1959, ch. 239, § 1; Repealed, L. 1965, ch. 564, § 416; January 1, 1966. CASE ANNOTATIONS 1. Unless renewed the mortgage is void as against creditors. Moore v. Shaw, 1 Kan. App. 103, 104, 40 P. 929. 2. Subsequent mortgagee with notice not subsequent mortgagee in good faith. Casner v. Crawford, 4 Kan. App. 687, 690, 46 P. 41. 3. Fee for filing affidavit considered; only one fee charged. Demers v. Comm'rs of Cloud Co., 5 Kan. App. 271, 277, 47 P. 567. 4. Mortgage, although not renewed, is valid against purchaser having notice. Schnaveley v. Bishop, 8 Kan. App. 301, 304, 55 P. 667. 5. Mortgagee acquiring possession after term expired takes priority over creditor. Dayton v. Savings Bank, 23 Kan. 421, 422. 6. Execution levied, between expiration of term and renewal, held valid. Lockwood, Englehart & Co. v. Crawford, 29 Kan. 286, 287. 7. Renewal affidavit unnecessary; person having actual knowledge of mortgage. Corbin v. Kincaid, 33 Kan. 649, 652, 7 P. 145. 8. No renewal affidavit filed; void against creditors of mortgagor. Swiggett v. Dodson, 38 Kan. 702, 707, 17 P. 594. 9. Renewal continues rights of mortgagee under his first mortgage. Howard v. National Bank, 44 Kan. 549, 552, 24 P. 983. 10. Second mortgage not given priority by failure to renew first. Farmers' Bank v. Bank of Glen Elder, 46 Kan. 376, 380, 26 P. 680. 11. Competency of notary public to administer oath on renewal affidavit. Fair v. Bank, 70 Kan. 612, 79 P. 144. 12. Actual notice cannot be substituted for renewal affidavit. Geiser v. Murray, 84 Kan. 450, 454, 114 P. 1046. 13. Mortgagee taking new mortgage may claim rights under old mortgage. Cornwell v. Moss, 95 Kan. 229, 235, 147 P. 824. 14. Time for filing renewal affidavit; thirty-day provisions construed. Wamberg v. Hart, 121 Kan. 218, 222, 246 P. 1010. 15. Phrase "subsequent purchasers or mortgagees" construed. Fourth National Bank v. Hill, 181 Kan. 683, 684, 690, 699, 314 P.2d 312. 16. Construction of section referred to in determining priority of rights under a perfected interest and judgment creditor under Uniform Commercial Code (K.S.A. 84-9-306). Blair Milling & Elevator Co., Inc. v. Wehrkamp, 217 Kan. 122, 124, 535 P.2d 457. Previous | Next LEGISLATIVE COORDINATING COUNCIL General Policies 2026 Archived LCC Documents Archived LCC Meetings REVISOR OF STATUTES Archived Session Documents Archived School Finance Documents USEFUL LINKS Session Laws Kansas Administrative Regulations OTHER LEGISLATIVE SITES Kansas Legislature Administrative Services Division of Post Audit Research Department Contact Us PDF Help www.ksrevisor.gov 2026