Repealed

K.S.A. 61-1304 — under FORCIBLE ENTRY AND DETAINER.

K.S.A. 61-1304

61-1304. History: G.S. 1868, ch. 81, § 161; L. 1905, ch. 338, § 1; R.S. 1923, 61-1304; Repealed, L. 1969, ch. 290, § 61-2606; January 1, 1970. Source or prior law: Terr. L. 1858, ch. 42, § 128; Terr. L. 1859, ch. 87, § 120. CASE ANNOTATIONS 1. Notice must be served before action brought; sufficiency of notice. Nason v. Best, 17 Kan. 408. 2. Sufficiency of notice; notice must show who claims property; presumption. Conaway v. Gore, 22 Kan. 216. 3. New notice required when action not begun within reasonable time. Douglass v. Whitaker, 32 Kan. 381, 4 P. 874. 4. Termination of tenancy; when notice hereunder may be served. Douglass v. Parker, 32 Kan. 593, 5 P. 178. 5. Plaintiff must show that the three-day notice to leave given. Stuller v. Sparks, 51 Kan. 19, 22, 31 P. 301. 6. Manner of making service of notice; description of property. Peddicord v. Berk, 74 Kan. 236, 239, 86 P. 465. Annotations to L. 1905, ch. 338, § 1: 7. Service of notice to leave served before lease expires; when. Headrick v. Price, 103 Kan. 751, 752, 176 P. 669. 8. Notice examined and held sufficient. Hale v. Brown, 119 Kan. 303, 239 P. 963. 9. Cited; tenant holding over after lease expires is tenant from year to year. McElroy v. Ball, 149 Kan. 284, 286, 87 P.2d 608. 10. History of section and forcible entry and detainer procedure discussed. McHenry v. Hubbard, 156 Kan. 415, 419, 134 P.2d 1107. 11. Necessary to comply with Federal Emergency Price Control Act to maintain action hereunder; essentials required in forcible entry and detainer action stated and applied. Bell v. Dennis, 158 Kan. 35, 37, 144 P.2d 938. 12. Compliance with Federal Emergency Price Control Act prerequisite to maintain action hereunder. Morrison v. Hutchins, 158 Kan. 123, 124, 144 P.2d 922. 13. Term "at least three days before" construed to mean "three clear days." Gunter v. Eiznhamer, 165 Kan. 510, 513, 514, 515, 196 P.2d 177. 14. Action taken under forcible entry and detainer statute reviewed; no error. Giese v. Weeden, 165 Kan. 551, 552, 196 P.2d 207. 15. Case of Gunter v. Eiznhamer, supra (No. 13), cited and approved. Baugh v. Rural High School District, 185 Kan. 123, 131, 340 P.2d 891. 16. Written notice that suit to be brought is condition precedent in forcible detainer action. Goodin v. King, 192 Kan. 304, 306, 307, 308, 309, 387 P.2d 206. Previous | Next LEGISLATIVE COORDINATING COUNCIL General Policies 2026 Archived LCC Documents Archived LCC Meetings REVISOR OF STATUTES Archived Session Documents Archived School Finance Documents USEFUL LINKS Session Laws Kansas Administrative Regulations OTHER LEGISLATIVE SITES Kansas Legislature Administrative Services Division of Post Audit Research Department Contact Us PDF Help www.ksrevisor.gov 2026