Repealed

61-1501. History: R.S. 1923, 61-1501; Repealed, L. 1969, ch. 290, § 61-2606; January 1, 1970. Source or prior law: Terr. L. 1858, ch. 42, § 202; Terr. L. 1859, ch. 87, § 184; L. 1867, ch. 48, § 2; G.S. 1868, ch. 81, § 185. CASE ANNOTATIONS 1. District court may allow amendment of transcript on appeal. Wilson v. Paxton, 7 Kan. App. 79, 52 P. 911. 2. Procedure to review judgment of justice considered. Stevens v. Beaseley, 8 Kan. App. 753, 754, 61 P. 762. 3. Justice had jurisdiction under G.S. 1868, ch. 80, § 529 (old civil code), of action on note for less than $300. Vincent v. Bonnell, 10 Kan. App. 554, 63 P. 24. 4. Amendment of bill of particulars without notice; when error immaterial. Alvey v. Wilson, 9 Kan. 401. 5. Old code provision providing for judgment against principal and surety applicable. Points v. Jacobia, 12 Kan. 50. 6. Old code provisions concerning pleading of setoff applicable. Stevens v. Able, 15 Kan. 584. 7. Old code provisions for granting new trials not applicable. Kerner v. Petigo, 25 Kan. 652. 8. Old code provisions concerning attachment before debt due, held not applicable. Lyons v. Insley, Shire & Co., 32 Kan. 174, 4 P. 150. 9. Old code provisions concerning interpleader in garnishment proceedings, held applicable. James Clark & Co. v. Wiss & Ballard, 34 Kan. 553, 9 P. 281. 10. Old code provision concerning summons to another county not applicable. The State ex rel., v. Brayman, 35 Kan. 714, 12 P. 111. 11. Provisions concerning revival of judgments held applicable where judgment not transferred. Israel v. Nichols, Shepard & Co., 37 Kan. 68, 14 P. 438. 12. Setoff not arising from contract cannot be pleaded. Cristy v. Jones, 39 Kan. 183, 18 P. 56. 13. Provisions concerning bond by executors, administrators, etc., on appeal held applicable. Freeman v. Hill, 45 Kan. 435, 25 P. 870. 14. Civil order of arrest held not to extend beyond county. In re Baum, 61 Kan. 117, 58 P. 958. 15. Transitory action brought where defendant summoned or resides. Kane v. Sowers, 105 Kan. 281, 182 P. 391. 16. Old code provisions concerning interpleader in garnishment proceedings held applicable. Mendall v. Union State Bank, 142 Kan. 84, 87, 45 P.2d 869. 17. Old code provisions relating to garnishment (L. 1941, ch. 287, § 1 and L. 1913, ch. 232, § 2) applicable. Losier v. Sherman, 157 Kan. 153, 155, 138 P.2d 272. 18. Old code provisions relating to counterclaim (L. 1909, ch. 182, § 97) held applicable to rent claim. Schulze v. Tavella, 171 Kan. 462, 465, 233 P.2d 715. Previous | Next LEGISLATIVE COORDINATING COUNCIL General Policies 2026 Archived LCC Documents Archived LCC Meetings REVISOR OF STATUTES Archived Session Documents Archived School Finance Documents USEFUL LINKS Session Laws Kansas Administrative Regulations OTHER LEGISLATIVE SITES Kansas Legislature Administrative Services Division of Post Audit Research Department Contact Us PDF Help www.ksrevisor.gov 2026