Repealed

65-1503. History: L. 1923, ch. 220, § 3; R.S. 1923, 65-1503; Repealed, L. 1975, ch. 318, § 11; July 1. Source or Prior Law: L. 1909, ch. 229, § 2. CASE ANNOTATIONS 1. Corporation cannot engage directly or indirectly in practice of optometry. State, ex rel., v. Goldman Jewelry Co., 142 Kan. 881, 884, 51 P.2d 995. 2. Board is without authority to decree forfeiture of license under K.S.A. 65-1507 for infraction hereunder. Haines v. Nickel, 195 Kan. 670, 671, 672, 674, 675, 676, 408 P.2d 626. 3. Forfeiture of certificate for alleged violation hereof; application for restoration of certificate not condition precedent to appeal. Ostler v. Nickel, 196 Kan. 477, 478, 413 P.2d 303. Previous | Next LEGISLATIVE COORDINATING COUNCIL General Policies 2026 Archived LCC Documents Archived LCC Meetings REVISOR OF STATUTES Archived Session Documents Archived School Finance Documents USEFUL LINKS Session Laws Kansas Administrative Regulations OTHER LEGISLATIVE SITES Kansas Legislature Administrative Services Division of Post Audit Research Department Contact Us PDF Help www.ksrevisor.gov 2026