Repealed

65-1510. History: L. 1923, ch. 220, § 14; R.S. 1923, 65-1510; L. 1939, ch. 240, § 4; L. 1975, ch. 318, § 8; Repealed, L. 1990, ch. 223, § 22; July 1. CASE ANNOTATIONS 1. Corporation cannot engage directly or indirectly in practice of optometry. State, ex rel., v. Goldman Jewelry Co., 142 Kan. 881, 883, 890, 51 P.2d 995. 2. Corporation ousted in quo warranto proceedings from practice of optometry. State, ex rel., v. Zale Jewelry Co., 179 Kan. 628, 298 P.2d 283. 3. Board's order revoking license upheld; rules for determination of validity stated. Marks v. Frantz, 183 Kan. 47, 51, 325 P.2d 368. 4. Cited in upholding validity of license revocation proceeding; conclusions of board supported by substantial competent evidence. Copeland v. Kansas State Board of Examiners in Optometry, 213 Kan. 741, 749, 518 P.2d 377. Previous | Next LEGISLATIVE COORDINATING COUNCIL General Policies 2026 Archived LCC Documents Archived LCC Meetings REVISOR OF STATUTES Archived Session Documents Archived School Finance Documents USEFUL LINKS Session Laws Kansas Administrative Regulations OTHER LEGISLATIVE SITES Kansas Legislature Administrative Services Division of Post Audit Research Department Contact Us PDF Help www.ksrevisor.gov 2026