Repealed

65-4141. History: L. 1989, ch. 179, § 1; L. 1992, ch. 298, § 76; L. 1993, ch. 291, § 236; L. 1994, ch. 338, § 13; Repealed, L. 2009, ch. 32, § 64; July 1. CASE ANNOTATIONS 1. State must prove underlying felony in prosecution for use of communication facility to facilitate a felony violation; conspiracy requires both agreement and overt act. State v. Hill, 252 Kan. 637, 641, 847 P.2d 1267 (1993). 2. Prosecution hereunder, based upon facilitation, requires proof of the actual commission of the underlying felony. State v. Garrison, 252 Kan. 929, 930, 932, 933, 935, 850 P.2d 244 (1993). 3. Whether court had jurisdiction to order pen register and wiretap when component located in adjacent county examined. State v. Gibson, 255 Kan. 474, 475, 491, 495, 874 P.2d 1122 (1994). 4. For prosecution hereunder, state must prove underlying felony; conviction hereunder and underlying felony are not double jeopardy; legislature intended separate punishments. State v. Kee, 27 Kan. App. 2d 677, 6 P.3d 938 (2000). 5. K.S.A. 65-4141(c) contains a specific penalty which is not subject to general penalties of K.S.A. 65-4127(c). State v. Lafleur, 34 Kan. App. 2d 652, 122 P.3d 831 (2005). 6. Cited; court discusses double jeopardy analysis to drug crimes, unitary conduct and unit of prosecution test. State v. Thompson, 287 Kan. 238, 247, 200 P.3d 22 (2008). Previous | Next LEGISLATIVE COORDINATING COUNCIL General Policies 2026 Archived LCC Documents Archived LCC Meetings REVISOR OF STATUTES Archived Session Documents Archived School Finance Documents USEFUL LINKS Session Laws Kansas Administrative Regulations OTHER LEGISLATIVE SITES Kansas Legislature Administrative Services Division of Post Audit Research Department Contact Us PDF Help www.ksrevisor.gov 2026