Repealed

65-4153. History: L. 1981, ch. 140, § 4; L. 1987, ch. 246, § 2; L. 1993, ch. 291, § 237; L. 1996, ch. 257, § 4; L. 2007, ch. 169, § 9; Repealed, L. 2009, ch. 32, § 64; July 1. CASE ANNOTATIONS 1. Possession of items for which there was no other reasonable legitimate use was sufficient evidence of intent; distinguished from possession of burglary tools. State v. Dunn, 233 Kan. 411, 412, 413, 662 P.2d 1286 (1983). 2. Seizure of person and pat-down search examined; circumstances determined as insufficient to justify stop and search. State v. Burks, 15 Kan. App. 2d 87, 88, 803 P.2d 587 (1991). 3. Test to determine whether search warrant meets constitutional requirements discussed; specificity, technical irregularities, search by affiant examined. State v. LeFort, 248 Kan. 332, 334, 806 P.2d 986 (1991). 4. Insufficient evidence to support conviction of faux crack cocaine. State v. Marion, 29 Kan. App. 2d 287, 27 P.3d 924 (2001). Previous | Next LEGISLATIVE COORDINATING COUNCIL General Policies 2026 Archived LCC Documents Archived LCC Meetings REVISOR OF STATUTES Archived Session Documents Archived School Finance Documents USEFUL LINKS Session Laws Kansas Administrative Regulations OTHER LEGISLATIVE SITES Kansas Legislature Administrative Services Division of Post Audit Research Department Contact Us PDF Help www.ksrevisor.gov 2026