Repealed

68-601. History: L. 1921, ch. 217, § 1; L. 1923, ch. 175, § 1; R.S. 1923, 68-601; Repealed, L. 1925, ch. 214, § 9; July 1. CASE ANNOTATIONS 1. Fund cannot be used for bridges or permanent improvements. State, ex rel., v. Franklin County, 115 Kan. 531, 535, 537, 223 P. 261. 2. Illegal use of fund by county commissioners discussed. State, ex rel., v. Rice County, 117 Kan. 348, 350, 230 P. 1041. 3. Recall petition not effective after partial completion of work in benefit district. True v. McCoy, 119 Kan. 824, 828, 241 P. 249. 4. Cited in determining liability for improvement within city. State, ex rel., v. State Highway Comm., 137 Kan. 800, 811, 22 P.2d 969. 5. Use of county bridge funds for state highways is not unlawful. State, ex rel., v. State Highway Comm., 138 Kan. 294, 307, 26 P.2d 606. Previous | Next LEGISLATIVE COORDINATING COUNCIL General Policies 2026 Archived LCC Documents Archived LCC Meetings REVISOR OF STATUTES Archived Session Documents Archived School Finance Documents USEFUL LINKS Session Laws Kansas Administrative Regulations OTHER LEGISLATIVE SITES Kansas Legislature Administrative Services Division of Post Audit Research Department Contact Us PDF Help www.ksrevisor.gov 2026