84-2-101. Short title. This article shall be known and may be cited as uniform commercial code—sales. History: L. 1965, ch. 564, § 18; January 1, 1966. KANSAS COMMENT, 1996 1. Article 2 modernized the Kansas law of sales. For a brief historical overview, see Kansas Comment 1983 to this section. Article 2 continues to be highly influential, with its provisions applied by analogy to transactions not otherwise within its scope, see 1996 Kansas Comment 3 to 84-2-102, and incorporated into the Restatement (Second) of Contracts. In addition, Article 2 itself continues to evolve, as courts resolve uncertainties and deal with rapid technological change in both the contracting process and the subject matter of contracts. Indeed, at the time these comments are being written, a drafting committee is considering significant changes to Article 2 that one day soon may be before the Kansas legislature. 2. For a general discussion of the Kansas law of sales, see Paul B. Rasor, Kansas Law of Sales Under the Uniform Commercial Code (1981 & Supp. 1989). Other useful secondary sources include James J. White & Robert S. Summers, 1 Uniform Commercial Code (4th ed. Practitioner Treatise Series 1995); William H. Henning & George I. Wallach, The Law of Sales Under the Uniform Commercial Code (rev. ed. 1992 & Supp. 1995); William D. Hawkland, 1-3 Uniform Commercial Code Series (1995); Barkley Clark & Christopher Smith, The Law of Product Warranties (1984 & Supp.1996). Law Review and Bar Journal References: "Contract Law: A Clean Start for Lost Volume Lessees [Jetz Service Co. v. Salina Properties, 865 P.2d 1051 (Kan. Ct. App. 1993)]," Jonathan J. Lautt, 34 W.L.J. 136 (1994). CASE ANNOTATIONS 1. Rights of parties arising out of aborted sale of motor vehicle considered and determined. Stanturf v. Quality Dodge, Inc., 3 Kan. App. 2d 485, 486, 596 P.2d 1247. 2. Where lease agreements were intended to create security interests under K.S.A. 84-1-201(37)(b), provisions of Article 9 of UCC applicable. CIT Financial Services, Inc. v. Gott, 5 Kan. App. 2d 224, 229, 231, 615 P.2d 774. 3. Action to collect federal excise taxes on diesel fuel; a valid contract existed and breached by mutual mistake; defendant would have been unjustly enriched. Continental Oil Co. v. Ideal Truck Lines, Inc., 7 Kan. App. 2d 153, 156, 638 P.2d 954 (1982). 4. Agreement between title insurance agency and title insurer was contract for services; article 2 of UCC inapplicable. Columbian Nat. Title Ins. v. Township Title Serv., 659 F. Supp. 796, 801 (1987). 5. Whether issue of breach of duty of good faith by supplier in negotiating final contract precluded summary judgment examined. Kansas Mun. Gas Agency v. Vesta Energy Co., Inc., 840 F. Supp. 814, 820 (1993). 6. Whether federal court in diversity action should look to both states UCC interpretations examined. M.K.C. Equipment Co. Inc. v. M.A.I.L. Code, Inc., 843 F. Supp. 679, 683 (1994).