Repealed

9-207. History: L. 1909, ch. 61, § 7; L. 1911, ch. 61, § 2; R.S. 1923, § 9-207; Repealed, L. 1929, ch. 89, § 1; March 14. CASE ANNOTATIONS 1. Original contract rate of interest between bank and depositor governs. Davis v. Bank Commissioner, 105 Kan. 560, 185 P. 41. 2. Effect of contracting for interest upon deposit considered. Davis v. Bank Commissioner, 105 Kan. 560, 563, 185 P. 41. 3. Effect of contracting for higher rate of interest considered. State Bank v. Bank Commissioner, 110 Kan. 520, 528, 204 P. 709. 4. Opinion of bank commissioner does not bind the guaranty fund. State Bank v. Bank Commissioner, 110 Kan. 520, 204 P. 709. 5. Bonus paid by third party not deemed excessive interest. Mortgage Trust Co. v. Bank Commissioner, 110 Kan. 786, 790, 791, 205 P. 610. 6. Section held not to have been violated; claim sustained. Bank v. Bank Commissioner, 112 Kan. 141, 144, 210 P. 490. 7. Contemporaneous agreement; depositor held entitled to participate in guaranty fund. Bank v. Bank Commissioner, 112 Kan. 141, 144, 210 P. 490. 8. Rate of interest on face of certificate legal; claim sustained. Bank v. Bank Commissioner, 112 Kan. 141, 144, 210 P. 490. 9. Deposit bearing excessive rate of interest is not within act. Koelling v. Bank Commissioner, 114 Kan. 109, 111, 216 P. 1099. 10. Certificate objected to because of date of maturity held to be within fund. Reserve State Bank v. Bank Commissioner, 117 Kan. 186, 187, 230 P. 1056. 11. Statute disavows state's responsibility for system. State, ex rel., v. Bone, 125 Kan. 818, 839, 266 P. 85. 12. Deposit subject to check bearing excess interest not within fund. Barber County v. Bank Commissioner, 113 Kan. 180, 189, 213 P. 1054; Burnaman v. Bank Commissioner, 117 Kan. 612, 615, 232 P. 1048. 13. Only deposit of money or its equivalent protected by fund. Bank v. Bank Commissioner, 114 Kan. 1, 5, 216 P. 1093. 14. Certificate of deposit in form set out held not to be within fund. Barrett v. Bank Commissioner, 114 Kan. 804, 223 P. 1091. 15. Depositors do not lose right in fund by suing bank officers. Ramsey v. Bank Commissioner, 115 Kan. 212, 222 P. 117. 16. Fact that security is inadequate will not bring it within fund. City of Osawatomie v. Bone, 121 Kan. 545, 247 P. 432. 17. Transaction examined and held not to constitute deposit. Peoples Bank v. Bone, 121 Kan. 768, 773, 250 P. 276. 18. Money or equivalent of money necessary to create deposit. Lloyd v. Butler County State Bank, 122 Kan. 835, 253 P. 906. Previous | Next LEGISLATIVE COORDINATING COUNCIL General Policies 2026 Archived LCC Documents Archived LCC Meetings REVISOR OF STATUTES Archived Session Documents Archived School Finance Documents USEFUL LINKS Session Laws Kansas Administrative Regulations OTHER LEGISLATIVE SITES Kansas Legislature Administrative Services Division of Post Audit Research Department Contact Us PDF Help www.ksrevisor.gov 2026