Perjury; no variance between “sworn” and “affirmed.”

Miss. Code Ann. § 99-17-33, under Trial.

Miss. Code Ann. § 99-17-33

In prosecutions for perjury, where the indictment charges that the defendant was duly sworn at the time he is averred to have testified falsely, it shall not be a variance if the proof show he was affirmed, and vice versa.