63G-2-404. Judicial review.
(1) A petition for judicial review of an order or decision, as allowed under this part, in Section, or in Subsection, shall be filed no later than 30 days after the date of the order or decision, subject to Subsection (1)(b). 63G-2-209 63G-2-701(6)(a)(ii) The time for a requester to file a petition for judicial review under Subsection (1)(a) is suspended for the period of time that: begins the date the requester submits a request under Sectionfor the government records ombudsman to mediate the dispute between the requester and the governmental entity; and 63A-12-204 ends the earlier of the following dates: the date that the government records ombudsman certifies in writing that the mediation is concluded; or the date that the government records ombudsman certifies in writing that the mediation did not occur or was not concluded because of a lack of the required consent.
(2) A petition for judicial review is a complaint governed by the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure and shall contain: the petitioner's name and mailing address; a copy of the director's order from which the appeal is taken, if the petitioner is seeking judicial review of an order of the director; the name and mailing address of the governmental entity that issued the initial determination with a copy of that determination; a request for relief specifying the type and extent of relief requested; and a statement of the reasons why the petitioner is entitled to relief. Except in exceptional circumstances, a petition for judicial review may not raise an issue that was not raised in the underlying appeal and order.
(3) If the appeal is based on the denial of access to a protected record based on a claim of business confidentiality, the court shall allow the claimant of business confidentiality to provide to the court the reasons for the claim of business confidentiality.
(4) All additional pleadings and proceedings in the district court are governed by the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure.
(5) The district court may review the disputed records. A review described in Subsectionshall be in camera. (5)(a)
(6) The court shall: make the court's decision de novo, but, for a petition seeking judicial review of a director's order, allow introduction of evidence presented to the director; determine all questions of fact and law without a jury; and decide the issue at the earliest practical opportunity. A court may remand a petition for judicial review to the director if: the remand is to allow the director to decide an issue that: involves access to a record; and the director did not address in the proceeding that led to the petition for judicial review; and the court determines that remanding to the director is in the best interests of justice.
(7) Except as provided in Section, the court may, upon consideration and weighing of the various interests and public policies pertinent to the classification and disclosure or nondisclosure, order the disclosure of information properly classified as private, controlled, or protected if the interest favoring access is greater than or equal to the interest favoring restriction of access. 63G-2-406 The court shall consider and, where appropriate, limit the requester's use and further disclosure of the record in order to protect privacy interests in the case of private or controlled records, business confidentiality interests in the case of records protected under Subsectionsand (2), and privacy interests or the public interest in the case of other protected records. 63G-2-305(1)