402.605 Waiver of buyer’s objections by failure to particularize. (1) The buyer’s failure to state in connection with rejection a particular defect which is ascertainable by reasonable inspection precludes the buyer from relying on the unstated defect to justify rejection or to establish breach: UCC — SALES (a) Where the seller could have cured it if stated seasonably;
buyer to hold the seller harmless against infringement or the like (s. 402.312 (3)).
(b) Between merchants when the seller has after rejection made a request in writing for a full and final written statement of all defects on which the buyer proposes to rely. (2) Payment against documents made without reservation of rights precludes recovery of the payment for defects apparent in the documents.
History: 1991 a. 316. Under the facts of the case, a two-month delay in giving notice was not unreasonable. Paulson v. Olson Implement Co., 107 Wis. 2d 510, 319 N.W.2d 855 (1982). Ordinarily, what constitutes a reasonable time is a question of fact for a jury. However, a delay may be for such a long period that as a matter of law the court must hold that the notice was not given within a reasonable time. Absent evidence of circumstances excusing or justifying the delay, ten months is not a reasonable time to delay giving notice as a matter of law. Wilson v. Tuxen, 2008 WI App 94, 312 Wis. 2d 705, 754 N.W.2d 220, 07-1964. Under sub. (2), once a buyer accepts a good, the buyer is precluded from rejecting that good. In this case, the buyer accepted the recreational vehicle (“RV”) under s. 402.606 (1) (a) when, after inspecting the RV and signifying to the seller that the RV was conforming, the buyer took exclusive possession of the RV and left the seller’s lot. At that moment, the purchase contract was fully performed, and the buyer was precluded from rejecting the RV. Balsimo v. Venture One Stop, Inc., 2024 WI App 58, 414 Wis. 2d 27, 13 N.W.3d 228, 22-1715. Sub. (3) (a) requires pre-suit notice. One of the purposes of the notice requirement is to enable the seller to take corrective action and avoid litigation. Thus, service of a summons and complaint cannot function as the notice required by sub. (3) (a). Brame v. General Motors LLC, 535 F. Supp. 3d 832 (2021). A buyer must give a seller notice of an alleged breach even if the seller would not have cured the breach after receiving the notice. Brame v. General Motors LLC, 535 F. Supp. 3d 832 (2021).
or
History: 1991 a. 316; 2009 a. 322.