PRIA, Government Policy, Made Personal

Summary

Makes actions by people working in organized major league baseball that directly affect hiring or employment of major league players subject to the antitrust laws in the same way as other pro sports. It only applies to things that directly affect major league players’ jobs. It does not let courts use this rule to change how antitrust rules apply to other baseball matters. The law excludes other areas such as minor-league employment and the amateur/first-year draft, the agreement and relationship between the major leagues and the minor leagues, franchise expansion, location or ownership issues and related marketing or licensing, matters protected by the Sports Broadcasting Act of 1961, relationships with umpires or other employees, or actions by people not in the major league business. Only a major league baseball player can sue under this rule. A “major league baseball player” means a person who is playing or was under a major league player’s contract when injured, someone who claims a past play hurt their chance to get another major league contract (excluding minor-league related claims), or someone who was a major leaguer at the end of the last full season before the most recent collective bargaining agreement expired. “Person” includes companies and groups, and the minor-league association is not counted as being in the major league business. When one action affects both major-league jobs and other baseball areas, only the parts that directly affect major-league employment can be challenged. The term “directly” is interpreted separately, and the law does not change the existing labor-exemption rules. The list of excluded matters should not be read too narrowly.

Title 15, §26b

Commerce and Trade, Source: USLM XML via OLRC

(a)Major league baseball subject to antitrust laws

Subject to subsections (b) through (d), the conduct, acts, practices, or agreements of persons in the business of organized professional major league baseball directly relating to or affecting employment of major league baseball players to play baseball at the major league level are subject to the antitrust laws to the same extent such conduct, acts, practices, or agreements would be subject to the antitrust laws if engaged in by persons in any other professional sports business affecting interstate commerce.

(b)Limitation of section (c) Standing to sue

No court shall rely on the enactment of this section as a basis for changing the application of the antitrust laws to any conduct, acts, practices, or agreements other than those set forth in subsection (a). This section does not create, permit or imply a cause of action by which to challenge under the antitrust laws, or otherwise apply the antitrust laws to, any conduct, acts, practices, or agreements that do not directly relate to or affect employment of major league baseball players to play baseball at the major league level, including but not limited to—

(1)any conduct, acts, practices, or agreements of persons engaging in, conducting or participating in the business of organized professional baseball relating to or affecting employment to play baseball at the minor league level, any organized professional baseball amateur or first-year player draft, or any reserve clause as applied to minor league players;

(2)the agreement between organized professional major league baseball teams and the teams of the National Association of Professional Baseball Leagues, commonly known as the “Professional Baseball Agreement”, the relationship between organized professional major league baseball and organized professional minor league baseball, or any other matter relating to organized professional baseball’s minor leagues;

(3)any conduct, acts, practices, or agreements of persons engaging in, conducting or participating in the business of organized professional baseball relating to or affecting franchise expansion, location or relocation, franchise ownership issues, including ownership transfers, the relationship between the Office of the Commissioner and franchise owners, the marketing or sales of the entertainment product of organized professional baseball and the licensing of intellectual property rights owned or held by organized professional baseball teams individually or collectively;

(4)any conduct, acts, practices, or agreements protected by Public Law 87–331 (15 U.S.C. § 1291 et seq.) (commonly known as the “Sports Broadcasting Act of 1961”);

(5)the relationship between persons in the business of organized professional baseball and umpires or other individuals who are employed in the business of organized professional baseball by such persons; or

(6)any conduct, acts, practices, or agreements of persons not in the business of organized professional major league baseball.

(d)Conduct, acts, practices, or agreements subject to antitrust laws

(1)As used in this section, “person” means any entity, including an individual, partnership, corporation, trust or unincorporated association or any combination or association thereof. As used in this section, the National Association of Professional Baseball Leagues, its member leagues and the clubs of those leagues, are not “in the business of organized professional major league baseball”.

(2)In cases involving conduct, acts, practices, or agreements that directly relate to or affect both employment of major league baseball players to play baseball at the major league level and also relate to or affect any other aspect of organized professional baseball, including but not limited to employment to play baseball at the minor league level and the other areas set forth in subsection (b), only those components, portions or aspects of such conduct, acts, practices, or agreements that directly relate to or affect employment of major league players to play baseball at the major league level may be challenged under subsection (a) and then only to the extent that they directly relate to or affect employment of major league baseball players to play baseball at the major league level.

(3)As used in subsection (a), interpretation of the term “directly” shall not be governed by any interpretation of section 151 et seq. of title 29, United States Code (as amended).

(4)Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect the application to organized professional baseball of the nonstatutory labor exemption from the antitrust laws.

(5)The scope of the conduct, acts, practices, or agreements covered by subsection (b) shall not be strictly or narrowly construed.

Notes & Related Subsidiaries

Editorial Notes

References in Text

The antitrust laws, referred to in text, are defined in section 12 of this title. Public Law 87–331, referred to in subsec. (b)(4), is Pub. L. 87–331, Sept. 30, 1961, 75 Stat. 732, which is classified generally to chapter 32 (§ 1291 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables. Codification Another section 27 of act Oct. 15, 1914, ch. 323, was renumbered section 28 and is classified to section 27 of this title.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Purpose Pub. L. 105–297, § 2, Oct. 27, 1998, 112 Stat. 2824, provided that: “It is the purpose of this legislation to state that major league baseball players are covered under the antitrust laws (i.e., that major league baseball players will have the same rights under the antitrust laws as do other professional athletes, e.g., football and basketball players), along with a provision that makes it clear that the passage of this Act [enacting this section and provisions set out as a note under section 1 of this title] does not change the application of the antitrust laws in any other context or with respect to any other person or entity.”

§26b Application of Antitrust Laws to Professional Major League Baseball