PRIA, Government Policy, Made Personal

Summary

Names the law the "Telephone Disclosure and Dispute Resolution Act" and explains why Congress acted about pay-per-call services. Congress says pay-per-call use, often through 900 telephone numbers, grew fast into a national, billion-dollar business because of new technology. These services can help people and make money for vendors and phone companies. Because calls cross state lines, Federal rules are needed. The lack of one set of rules caused confusion and let some businesses mislead or harm consumers. Ads and billing must be accurate so callers are not surprised. That includes price-per-call, how long a call lasts, odds for lotteries/games/sweepstakes, and getting parental consent for callers under 18. Consumer trust and clear ways to fix billing disputes are needed so honest businesses can keep growing.

Title 15, §5701

Commerce and Trade, Source: USLM XML via OLRC

(a)Short title

This chapter may be cited as the “Telephone Disclosure and Dispute Resolution Act”.

(b)Findings

The Congress finds the following:

(1)The use of pay-per-call services, most commonly through the use of 900 telephone numbers, has grown exponentially in the past few years into a national, billion-dollar industry as a result of recent technological innovations. Such services are convenient to consumers, cost-effective to vendors, and profitable to communications common carriers.

(2)Many pay-per-call businesses provide valuable information, increase consumer choices, and stimulate innovative and responsive services that benefit the public.

(3)The interstate nature of the pay-per-call industry means that its activities are beyond the reach of individual States and therefore requires Federal regulatory treatment to protect the public interest.

(4)The lack of nationally uniform regulatory guidelines has led to confusion for callers, subscribers, industry participants, and regulatory agencies as to the rights of callers and the oversight responsibilities of regulatory authorities, and has allowed some pay-per-call businesses to engage in practices that abuse the rights of consumers.

(5)Some interstate pay-per-call businesses have engaged in practices which are misleading to the consumer, harmful to the public interest, or contrary to accepted standards of business practices and thus cause harm to the many reputable businesses that are serving the public.

(6)Because the consumer most often incurs a financial obligation as soon as a pay-per-call transaction is completed, the accuracy and descriptiveness of vendor advertisements become crucial in avoiding consumer abuse. The obligation for accuracy should include price-per-call and duration-of-call information, odds disclosure for lotteries, games, and sweepstakes, and obligations for obtaining parental consent from callers under 18.

(7)The continued growth of the legitimate pay-per-call industry is dependent upon consumer confidence that unfair and deceptive behavior will be effectively curtailed and that consumers will have adequate rights of redress.

(8)Vendors of telephone-billed goods and services must also feel confident in their rights and obligations for resolving billing disputes if they are to use this new marketplace for the sale of products of more than nominal value.

Notes & Related Subsidiaries

Editorial Notes

References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a), was in the original “this Act”, meaning Pub. L. 102–556, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4181, which enacted this chapter and section 228 of Title 47, Telecommunications, amended section 227 and 302a of Title 47, enacted provisions set out as a note under section 302a of Title 47, and amended provisions set out as a note under section 227 of Title 47. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

§5701 Short Title; Findings

Summary

Title 15, §5701

Notes & Related Subsidiaries

Editorial Notes

References in Text

Citations & Metadata