PRIA, Government Policy, Made Personal

Summary

The Commission must provide secondary treatment of sewage in Mexico for up to 50 million gallons per day (mgd) of wastewater from the IWTP and other flows from the Tijuana River area if that treatment is not done in the United States. If a plan shows more capacity is needed, the Commission may add up to 25 mgd more in Mexico. The Administrator must make a detailed plan within 24 months after November 7, 2000, with public input. The plan must study long‑term secondary treatment needs, needed fixes to Tijuana’s sewer system, and options with recommended choices for extra treatment capacity. To carry out the work, the Commission may sign a multiyear, fee‑for‑service contract with a Mexican plant owner (subject to available funding). The contract must run 20 years and include at least transportation of the IWTP effluent to the Mexican plant, treatment to meet U.S., California, and Mexican water standards, return of any treated water that can’t be reused to the South Bay Ocean Outfall, extra capacity for Tijuana flows, monitoring and enforcement, sludge handling in Mexico, the owner keeping a 20% equity stake, payments that cover agreed costs (including any insurance costs), rules on cancellation and ownership transfer if needed, competitive buying for contractors with Commission review, recordkeeping, Inspector General access for audits, and credits if the owner sells treated water. The State Department Inspector General must monitor contracts and report to Congress 2 years after a contract is signed, again 3 years later, and periodically after that.

Title 22, §277d–44

Foreign Relations and Intercourse, Source: USLM XML via OLRC

(a)(1)Pursuant to Treaty Minute 311 to the Treaty for the Utilization of Waters of the Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande, dated February 3, 1944, and notwithstanding section 510(b)(2) of the Water Quality Act of 1987 (101 Stat. 81), the Commission is authorized and directed to provide for the secondary treatment of a total of not more than 50 mgd in Mexico—

(A)of effluent from the IWTP if such treatment is not provided for at a facility in the United States; and

(B)of additional sewage emanating from the Tijuana River area, Mexico.

(2)Subject to the results of the comprehensive plan developed under subsection (b) revealing a need for additional secondary treatment capacity in the San Diego-Tijuana border region and recommending the provision of such capacity in Mexico, the Commission may provide not more than an additional 25 mgd of secondary treatment capacity in Mexico for treatment described in paragraph (1).

(b)Not later than 24 months after November 7, 2000, the Administrator shall develop a comprehensive plan with stakeholder involvement to address the transborder sanitation problems in the San Diego-Tijuana border region. The plan shall include, at a minimum—

(1)an analysis of the long-term secondary treatment needs of the region;

(2)an analysis of upgrades in the sewage collection system serving the Tijuana area, Mexico; and

(3)an identification of options, and recommendations for preferred options, for additional sewage treatment capacity for future flows emanating from the Tijuana River area, Mexico.

(c)(1)Notwithstanding any provision of Federal procurement law, the Commission may enter into a multiyear fee-for-services contract with the owner of a Mexican facility in order to carry out the secondary treatment requirements of subsection (a) and make payments under such contract, subject to the availability of appropriations and subject to the terms of paragraph (2).

(2)Any contract under this subsection shall provide, at a minimum, for the following:

(A)Transportation of the advanced primary effluent from the IWTP to the Mexican facility for secondary treatment.

(B)Treatment of the advanced primary effluent from the IWTP to the secondary treatment level in compliance with water quality laws of the United States, California, and Mexico.

(C)Return conveyance from the Mexican facility of any such treated effluent that cannot be reused in either Mexico or the United States to the South Bay Ocean Outfall for discharge into the Pacific Ocean in compliance with water quality laws of the United States and California.

(D)Subject to the requirements of subsection (a), additional sewage treatment capacity that provides for advanced primary and secondary treatment of sewage described in subsection (a)(1)(B) in addition to the capacity required to treat the advanced primary effluent from the IWTP.

(E)A contract term of 20 years.

(F)Arrangements for monitoring, verification, and enforcement of compliance with United States, California, and Mexican water quality standards.

(G)Arrangements for the disposal and use of sludge, produced from the IWTP and the Mexican facility, at a location or locations in Mexico.

(H)Maintenance by the owner of the Mexican facility at all times throughout the term of the contract of a 20 percent equity position in the capital structure of the Mexican facility.

(I)Payment of fees by the Commission to the owner of the Mexican facility for sewage treatment services with the annual amount payable to reflect all agreed upon costs associated with the development, financing, construction, operation, and maintenance of the Mexican facility, including costs associated with the purchase of any insurance or other financial instrument under subparagraph (K). Costs associated with the purchase of such insurance or other financial instrument may be amortized over the term of the contract.

(J)Neither the Commission nor the United States Government shall be liable for payment of any cancellation fees if the Commission cancels the contract.

(K)The owner of the Mexican facility may purchase insurance or other financial instrument to cover the risk of cancellation of the contract by the Commission. Any such insurance or other financial instrument shall not be provided or guaranteed by the United States Government, and the Government may reserve the right to validate independently the reasonableness of the premium when negotiating the annual service fee with the owner.

(L)Transfer of ownership of the Mexican facility to an appropriate governmental entity, other than the United States, if the Commission cancels the contract.

(M)Transfer of ownership of the Mexican facility to an appropriate governmental entity, other than the United States, if the owner of the Mexican facility fails to perform under the contract.

(N)The use of competitive procedures under applicable law, consistent with division C (except section 3302, 3307(e), 3501(b), 3509, 3906, 4710, and 4711) of subtitle I of title 41, by the owner of the Mexican facility in the procurement of property or services for the engineering, construction, and operation and maintenance of the Mexican facility.

(O)An opportunity for the Commission to review and approve the selection of contractors providing engineering, construction, and operation and maintenance for the Mexican facility.

(P)The maintenance by the owner of the Mexican facility of all records (including books, documents, papers, reports, and other materials) necessary to demonstrate compliance with the terms of this section and the contract.

(Q)Access by the Inspector General of the Department of State or the designee of the Inspector General for audit and examination of all records maintained pursuant to subparagraph (N) 11 See References in Text note below. to facilitate the monitoring and evaluation required under subsection (d).

(R)Offsets or credits against the payments to be made by the Commission under this section to reflect an agreed upon percentage of payments that the owner of the Mexican facility receives through the sale of water treated by the facility.

(d)(1)The Inspector General of the Department of State shall monitor the implementation of any contract entered into under this section and evaluate the extent to which the owner of the Mexican facility has met the terms of this section and fulfilled the terms of the contract.

(2)The Inspector General shall transmit to Congress a report containing the evaluation under paragraph (1) not later than 2 years after the execution of any contract with the owner of the Mexican facility under this section, 3 years thereafter, and periodically after the second report under this paragraph.

Notes & Related Subsidiaries

Editorial Notes

References in Text

section 510(b)(2) of the Water Quality Act of 1987, referred to in subsec. (a)(1), is section 510(b)(2) of Pub. L. 100–4, title V, Feb. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 81, which is not classified to the Code. Subparagraph (N) of subsec. (c)(2) of this section, referred to in subsec. (c)(2)(Q), was redesignated as subparagraph (P) by Pub. L. 108–425, § 1(b)(3), Nov. 30, 2004, 118 Stat. 2420. Codification In subsec. (c)(2)(N), “division C (except section 3302, 3307(e), 3501(b), 3509, 3906, 4710, and 4711) of subtitle I of title 41” substituted for “title III of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (41 U.S.C. 251 et seq.)” on authority of Pub. L. 111–350, § 6(c), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3854, which Act enacted Title 41, Public Contracts.

Amendments

2004—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 108–425, § 1(a), substituted “Pursuant to Treaty Minute 311 to the Treaty for the Utilization of Waters of the Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande, dated February 3, 1944,” for “Subject to the negotiation and conclusion of a new Treaty Minute or the amendment of Treaty Minute 283 under section 1005 of this Act,”. Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 108–425, § 1(b)(1), added par. (1) and struck out former par. (1) which read as follows: “Subject to the availability of appropriations to carry out this subsection and notwithstanding any provision of Federal procurement law, upon conclusion of a new Treaty Minute or the amendment of Treaty Minute 283 under section 5, the Commission may enter into a fee-for-services contract with the owner of a Mexican facility in order to carry out the secondary treatment requirements of subsection (a) of this section and make payments under such contract.” Subsec. (c)(2)(I). Pub. L. 108–425, § 1(b)(2), substituted “, including costs associated with the purchase of any insurance or other financial instrument under subparagraph (K). Costs associated with the purchase of such insurance or other financial instrument may be amortized over the term of the contract.” for “, with such annual payment to maintain the owner’s 20 percent equity position throughout the term of the contract.” Subsec. (c)(2)(J), (K). Pub. L. 108–425, § 1(b)(3), added subpars. (J) and (K). Former subpars. (J) and (K) redesignated (L) and (M), respectively. Subsec. (c)(2)(L), (M). Pub. L. 108–425, § 1(b)(4), added subpars. (L) and (M) and struck out former subpars. (L) and (M) which read as follows: “(L) Provision for the transfer of ownership of the Mexican facility to the United States, and provision for a cancellation fee by the United States to the owner of the Mexican facility, if the Commission fails to perform its obligations under the contract. The cancellation fee shall be in amounts declining over the term of the contract anticipated to be sufficient to repay

Construction

debt and other amounts due to the owner that remain unamortized due to early termination of the contract. “(M) Provision for the transfer of ownership of the Mexican facility to the United States, without a cancellation fee, if the owner of the Mexican facility fails to perform the obligations of the owner under the contract.” Pub. L. 108–425, § 1(b)(3), redesignated subpars. (J) and (K) as (L) and (M), respectively. Former subpars. (L) and (M) redesignated (N) and (O), respectively. Subsec. (c)(2)(N). Pub. L. 108–425, § 1(b)(3), (5), redesignated subpar. (L) as (N) and inserted “under applicable law” after “competitive procedures”. Former subpar. (N) redesignated (P). Subsec. (c)(2)(O) to (R). Pub. L. 108–425, § 1(b)(3), redesignated subpars. (M) to (P) as (O) to (R), respectively.

§277d–44 Actions to Be Taken by the Commission and the Administrator